War and religion

Two hot topics for the price of one

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
achilles12604
Site Supporter
Posts: 3697
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:37 am
Location: Colorado

War and religion

Post #1

Post by achilles12604 »

This debate sort of started on its own after I posted my findings about the correlation between religion and war casualties over the last 1000 years. It then recently came up in another thread.

So I am putting it out there for debate. Are my facts and figures correct? Are they applicable? If not, then where did I go wrong? And most importantly, if I am incorrect, how would you do better?

I also encourage anyone to do the same thing I did and obtain a list of all the major (+1000 deaths) conflicts and then sort them out due to primary causes. It took me about 10-11 hours to do.

http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/v ... php?t=7085
It is a first class human tragedy that people of the earth who claim to believe in the message of Jesus, whom they describe as the Prince of Peace, show little of that belief in actual practice.

User avatar
achilles12604
Site Supporter
Posts: 3697
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 3:37 am
Location: Colorado

Re: War and religion

Post #11

Post by achilles12604 »

goat wrote:
I don't think it can be all that clear cut... religious or non religious. or ignorance.
for example, the strong 'anti-condom' message of the RCC is causing a lot more incidences of aids than if it wasn't there, but there would be many cases anyway.

Besides, your topic was 'war'.. and famines were not war.
I included them because it appears that Stalin et al used them against specific political targets. And I still think that this point is made soundly.

For the sake of argument, we can remove them for the purpose of our debate. That removes 89 million from the non-religious. Now the ratio is 133 million to 350 million or just around a 1 : 2.6 ratio.

Religion is still behind by more than 2/3. Almost 3/4.

And that is assuming that those famines were in fact NOT attributed to policial reasons, which I think they were.

Any other objections? Even given that generous chunk, my point still stands very firm.
It is a first class human tragedy that people of the earth who claim to believe in the message of Jesus, whom they describe as the Prince of Peace, show little of that belief in actual practice.

Post Reply