Baptist Church Excludes Democrats

Two hot topics for the price of one

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
perfessor
Scholar
Posts: 422
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Illinois

Baptist Church Excludes Democrats

Post #1

Post by perfessor »

http://www.wlos.com/

I don't get it. Didn't Jesus ply his trade among tax collectors, prostitutes, and other "sinners"?
East Waynesville Baptist asked nine members to leave. Now 40 more have left the church in protest. Former members say Pastor Chan Chandler gave them the ultimatum, saying if they didn't support George Bush, they should resign or repent. The minister declined an interview with News 13. But he did say "the actions were not politically motivated." There are questions about whether the bi-laws were followed when the members were thrown out.
So my question for debate: Should the East Waynesville Baptist Church lose its tax-exempt status?

I say they should, since the pastor has turned the church into an arm of the Republican party.
"When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist."

melikio
Guru
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: U.S.A.

Not simple.

Post #391

Post by melikio »

It is that simple.
Umm...no, it really isn't.

-Mel-
"It is better to BE more like Jesus and assume to speak less for God." -MA-

AlAyeti
Guru
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:03 pm

Post #392

Post by AlAyeti »

Atheists are not all of one belief. There are not 'churches of atheism' that teach atheist doctrine. They are not bound be common doctrines except for the commonality of disbelieving that God exists.


This is not an accurate statement. It is a cop-out not in keeping with presenting a logical argument.

I claim that Catholics are responsible for almost every Christian atrocity, or that it is not following the Gospels to kill people in the name of Christ, and I don't get of the hook.

The Humanist Manifesto binds the club of bobbleheads I list so frequently. Their common cause is the single-minded purpose of showing Christians as voodoo worshipping nutballs.

The facts speak against Humanists-atheists-agnostics-freethinkers-progressives-liberals yada-yada. You know all of those people that think so independently of each other yet spout the exact same lingo like a puppet in a ventriloquist show. Chrstians the world over are the most decent and caring people on Earth.

Your car breaks down at 1:00am outside a liquor store. You need info on where you are and how to get a cab to take you home. You look around and see some filthy pants sagging guys with tats and facial piercings gripping beers and cursing about some chick that won't put out. You notice a lowered car of "playa's" bumping some jams staring at you. A van load of students coming home from a Comtemporary Christian Music concert slows at the light and you hear a familiar Christian hymn through the closed windows. They turn in and head to the church a few doors down from the liquor store.

Who do you ask for help?

The denigartion coming from Democrats against Evangelical Christians is real.

melikio
Guru
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: U.S.A.

Honesty

Post #393

Post by melikio »

Their common cause is the single-minded purpose of showing Christians as voodoo worshipping nutballs.
Some who claim the label "Christian", are about as effective as what you describe above. And no, ALL atheists are NOT of a singularly-monolithic mindset (Christians aren't that way either, though some want people to think so).

It's really about individuals, not the titles so often thrown at the nebulous-groupings of people with no faces.

Due to ignorance and other very negative HUMAN traits, "stereotyping" comes easily to us all. BTW, Christians also struggle with human nature, quite readily at that.

-Mel-
"It is better to BE more like Jesus and assume to speak less for God." -MA-

melikio
Guru
Posts: 1715
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: U.S.A.

Sometimes.

Post #394

Post by melikio »

Your car breaks down at 1:00am outside a liquor store. You need info on where you are and how to get a cab to take you home. You look around and see some filthy pants sagging guys with tats and facial piercings gripping beers and cursing about some chick that won't put out. You notice a lowered car of "playa's" bumping some jams staring at you. A van load of students coming home from a Comtemporary Christian Music concert slows at the light and you hear a familiar Christian hymn through the closed windows. They turn in and head to the church a few doors down from the liquor store.
Sometimes, the wolves wear "sheep's" clothing.

The situation you describe is clearly delineated; but life has more nuances in it than that one scenario. Some of the most DANGEROUS and terrible people I've known, look like what MANY would label "Christian". Are you saying that no (zero) Christians fit a discription of somene who could frighten you?

I see your point; it appeals to the fear we might all possess. But it doesn't necessarily paint a real picture of things as they actually are.

-Mel-
"It is better to BE more like Jesus and assume to speak less for God." -MA-

User avatar
micatala
Site Supporter
Posts: 8338
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 2:04 pm

Post #395

Post by micatala »

Quote micatala:
Atheists are not all of one belief. There are not 'churches of atheism' that teach atheist doctrine. They are not bound be common doctrines except for the commonality of disbelieving that God exists.
AlAyeti:
This is not an accurate statement. It is a cop-out not in keeping with presenting a logical argument.

I claim that Catholics are responsible for almost every Christian atrocity, or that it is not following the Gospels to kill people in the name of Christ, and I don't get of the hook.
No, Al, it is not a copout. I am simply saying that, in my view, you are comparing apples to oranges.

In addition, if you go back to my full post you will see that I at least would let you off the hook to the extent that I think you are correct in saying that we should not blame all Christians for the crimes of the few. Now, I would not say it is fair to blame all Catholics either, for crimes of the few, but I'll leave it at that.

My main point continues to be that it is not appropriate to smear an entire group of people for crimes that are committed by only a few people. The only time I could see this being appropriate is if the entire group identity was tied up in or included particular 'criminal acts.' One example might be the KKK, a group whose entire mission includes the idea of oppressing, if not annihilating, black people. It is reasonably fair to criticize any KKK member for the crimes committed by the people of that organization because the organization is arguably largely criminal or terrorist in nature.

It is absolutley unfair, unsubstantiated, and false to say the same of atheists, just as it is to say the same of Christians. In both cases, you have a large group of people (well, much, much larger in the case of Christianity) that are very diverse in their beliefs, outlooks, and actions, even though there is some commonality of belief (or non-belief) as well. In neither case does the 'group identify' have anything to do per se with the atrocities or crimes that have been cited in an attempt to smear the groups. Stalin may be an atheist, but his crimes had everything to do with his own personal megalomania and paranoia and nothing to do with his atheism. The vast majority of atheists are peaceful, law-abiding citizens, just as is the case with Christians.


On to another point. I criticized you earlier for your lack of logic. Here is another example.
AlAyeti wrote:How many MTV employees are Liberals? That now means Democrat.
This is just as logical as saying

How many KKK members are conservatives? That now means Christian (or Republican)
in other words, there is little if any logic in either of these statements.





Not to repeat myself, but what is wrong in suggesting that Christians in general follow the following advice?
micatala wrote:Even if some atheists try to lay the blame for the crimes of particular Christians at the feet of all, in my view, we as Christians should 'turn the other cheek' at least to the extent that we do not respond in kind by throwing the same type of illogical and untrue assertions back. Yes, I think it is appropriate to say that not all Christians are responsible for the crimes of the few. BUt then, leave it at that.

AlAyeti
Guru
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:03 pm

Post #396

Post by AlAyeti »

Quote micatala:
Atheists are not all of one belief. There are not 'churches of atheism' that teach atheist doctrine. They are not bound be common doctrines except for the commonality of disbelieving that God exists.


AlAyeti:
This is not an accurate statement. It is a cop-out not in keeping with presenting a logical argument.

I claim that Catholics are responsible for almost every Christian atrocity, or that it is not following the Gospels to kill people in the name of Christ, and I don't get of the hook.

No, Al, it is not a copout. I am simply saying that, in my view, you are comparing apples to oranges.
I have added up the numbers of people killed in Christian actions pointed out by the Persnickity Platypus, and those killed in Atheist-Secular actions. Two and half million over two thousand years compared to hundreds of millions being murdered by atheism and secualrism since the Enlightenment.

I always have this comeback to the bobbleheadism of the anti-Christian argument. The Christians did not "start" the Crusades. The Muslims did. Why can't people that hate Christianity get that right?
In addition, if you go back to my full post you will see that I at least would let you off the hook to the extent that I think you are correct in saying that we should not blame all Christians for the crimes of the few. Now, I would not say it is fair to blame all Catholics either, for crimes of the few, but I'll leave it at that.
To judge the guilt od anyone is to present evidence. Catholicism and atheism does not look good to makind. Just use evidence.
My main point continues to be that it is not appropriate to smear an entire group of people for crimes that are committed by only a few people. The only time I could see this being appropriate is if the entire group identity was tied up in or included particular 'criminal acts.'
Humanism IS an religion. Study its history.
One example might be the KKK, a group whose entire mission includes the idea of oppressing, if not annihilating, black people. It is reasonably fair to criticize any KKK member for the crimes committed by the people of that organization because the organization is arguably largely criminal or terrorist in nature.


The KKK is an Aryan religious movement. It can be shown by evidence to not be following the Gospels.
It is absolutley unfair, unsubstantiated, and false to say the same of atheists, just as it is to say the same of Christians.


In history, where Atheism has gone, millions and millions have been slaughterd. That is following the evidence.
In both cases, you have a large group of people (well, much, much larger in the case of Christianity) that are very diverse in their beliefs, outlooks, and actions, even though there is some commonality of belief (or non-belief) as well.


China, Russia, N. Korea, Cuba, SE Asian communist countries, ALL Athiest. Certainly what would qualify as a VERY large group of people. Billion-plus I'm getting on my calculator.
In neither case does the 'group identify' have anything to do per se with the atrocities or crimes that have been cited in an attempt to smear the groups.


I'm feeling pretty comfortable in front of a healthy minded jury.
Stalin may be an atheist, but his crimes had everything to do with his own personal megalomania and paranoia and nothing to do with his atheism.
A mind that actually dwells in chaos is going to lean towards megalomania.
The vast majority of atheists are peaceful, law-abiding citizens, just as is the case with Christians.


I agree with you. But, Atheists en mases continue to perpetuate the myth of Christian atrocities without any reference to other peoples that have killed their victims in millions and millions. I just point out facts. Anyone can see from my "judgmental" perspective, that neither Christians that kill . . . or Muslims, Atheists, Secualrists (or anyone else), that continue to murder to this day, get off my hook.

On to another point. I criticized you earlier for your lack of logic. Here is another example.

AlAyeti wrote:
How many MTV employees are Liberals? That now means Democrat.


This is just as logical as saying


Quote:
How many KKK members are conservatives? That now means Christian (or Republican)


in other words, there is little if any logic in either of these statements.
Conservatives as we can see with the Miers Supremem Court nomination, will hold each other accountable. Any Democrats telling children not to watch the filth on MTV?

The KKK are not welcomed onto the stage at the GOP convention or their money in Republican coffers. While pimps and whores literally dance on stage for Democrat causes, with Presidential candidates. Rappers are good role models to whom? Prison inmates?
Not to repeat myself, but what is wrong in suggesting that Christians in general follow the following advice?

micatala wrote:
Even if some atheists try to lay the blame for the crimes of particular Christians at the feet of all, in my view, we as Christians should 'turn the other cheek' at least to the extent that we do not respond in kind by throwing the same type of illogical and untrue assertions back.


It is logical and fair to compare the worth of belief systems. Atheism is intolerant of any opposing views and yet demands diversity of others. I as a freethinking American, do not tolerate that. Why should I? Now, if they ramp up their hatred to full scale genocide like the Muslims are, to make Christians choose life or Christ, then I pray, that I will go like a lamb to the fate that awits me.
Yes, I think it is appropriate to say that not all Christians are responsible for the crimes of the few. BUt then, leave it at that.


Please tell that to the bobbleheads at infidels.org and the ubiquitous atheists that teach our youth in just about every College and University in the world.

Whe I watch a person smash down a building without cleaning it up, and they b-tch at me for not picking up a gum wrapper I dropped, yeah, I'm going tp point out their hypocrisy.

But the spirit with which you approach the issue is indeed the right one.

Now, those Democrats in the Baptist Church here in question, do you think mthey see anything wrong with Democrat atrocities? If they bdon't then out they go!

User avatar
bernee51
Site Supporter
Posts: 7813
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Australia

Post #397

Post by bernee51 »

AlAyeti wrote:
I have added up the numbers of people killed in Christian actions pointed out by the Persnickity Platypus, and those killed in Atheist-Secular actions. Two and half million over two thousand years compared to hundreds of millions being murdered by atheism and secualrism since the Enlightenment.
I think your numbers are out somewhat...which does not surprise me at all.

Look at the list....

Then you might want to add those killed by, or with the encouragment/sanction of your god into the equation...
AlAyeti wrote:
I always have this comeback to the bobbleheadism of the anti-Christian argument. The Christians did not "start" the Crusades. The Muslims did. Why can't people that hate Christianity get that right?
Sure - the Saracen sent a request to the English/French/Frankish courts saying 'come and attack us and massacre our women and children'
It is absolutley unfair, unsubstantiated, and false to say the same of atheists, just as it is to say the same of Christians.

AlAyeti wrote: In history, where Atheism has gone, millions and millions have been slaughterd. That is following the evidence.
The same can be said of christianity. Follow the evidence.

AlAyeti wrote: A mind that actually dwells in chaos is going to lean towards megalomania.
And this AlAyetiism" is based on...?
AlAyeti wrote: But, Atheists en mases continue to perpetuate the myth of Christian atrocities without any reference to other peoples that have killed their victims in millions and millions. I just point out facts. Anyone can see from my "judgmental" perspective, that neither Christians that kill . . . or Muslims, Atheists, Secualrists (or anyone else), that continue to murder to this day, get off my hook.
Humans kill Al. It doesn't matter what label they have, humans kill, usually because of the label.

The day that labels disappear will be a day of peace.
AlAyeti wrote:. Atheism is intolerant of any opposing views and yet demands diversity of others.
Prove this statement or retract.

Atheism is a disbelief in god(s). What an individual atheism might think is irrelevent to atheism per se.

AlAyeti - the King of Generalizations
"Whatever you are totally ignorant of, assert to be the explanation of everything else"

William James quoting Dr. Hodgson

"When I see I am nothing, that is wisdom. When I see I am everything, that is love. My life is a movement between these two."

Nisargadatta Maharaj

AlAyeti
Guru
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:03 pm

Post #398

Post by AlAyeti »

AlAyeti wrote:

In history, where Atheism has gone, millions and millions have been slaughterd. That is following the evidence.


The same can be said of christianity. Follow the evidence.
. . . And, compare. Let the scales of justice weigh the worth of ideologies that promote killing of innocent people. Russia. China, Cuba, Cambodia, N. Korea et al, the ACLU and Roe vs. Wade!

Christianty has no such teachings. Judge those that violate the teachings of Christ two ways. Societal laws or the Gospels. I OK with either. This puts a lot of non-godians where they belong.
Sure - the Saracen sent a request to the English/French/Frankish courts saying 'come and attack us and massacre our women and children'
I have condemned what happened by Christian forces trying to take back the land brutally forced from them by Muslims. But it is the height of ignorance to try to paint the Muslims as peaceful combatants. In fact the history of Arabs and the Holy land speaks of the same throughout time.

http://www.think-israel.org/green.medit ... story.html
The historian Tacitus describing the Roman forces besieging Jerusalem in the year 70 CE, wrote: "Then there were strong levies of Arabs who felt for the Jews the hatred common between neighbors" (The Histories, V:1; tr. Wellesley). This is not quoted to stir up rancor based on ancient wrongs but to show how far back the Arab relationship goes with both Jews and the West, often taking quite constructive forms to be sure.

Of course the rise of Islam in the seventh century is rightly considered a great turning point in Arab history, and that of the whole Mediterranean. For the Jews it meant an improvement in some ways over the previous Roman and Byzantine oppression. For instance, Jews were again allowed to live in Jerusalem. But in other ways, their status worsened. Muslim oppression worsened as time went on. Jews had to pay severe taxes as dhimmis, members of the inferior class of non-Muslims whose toleration in a state of humiliation was decreed by the Quran. Christians shared the dhimmi status with the Jews, while slaves were imported to the Muslim Arab domain from distant climes, from Africa, Europe, and central Asia. Indeed, the Arabs may be called "equal opportunity enslavers," since their slaves could be of any color. Yet, typically slaves were unbelievers, kaffirs in Arabic. The European colonizers in Africa borrowed the name kaffir from the Arabs, applying it to the native black Africans, unbelievers in the eyes of both Christians and Muslims.
The same can be said of christianity. Follow the evidence.
No problem. And you see the worlds poor and starving are being fed by Christians. As of right this moment.
AlAyeti wrote:
. Atheism is intolerant of any opposing views and yet demands diversity of others.


Prove this statement or retract.
The long history of intolerance is stone cold fact. Carved into the walls where once stood the Ten Commandments. How these fairy tales can bother people that will not believe in them proves the intolerance of forcing their removal.

Also I'll add the newest atheist Anti-Christian bigot Michael Newdow. He loses in the Supreme Court his little fight to hurt his ex-wife and Christians country-wide and he is back at it again. I stand firm with solid evidence in hand.
Atheism is a disbelief in god(s). What an individual atheism might think is irrelevent to atheism per se.
Yet you effortlessly blame every Christian for a few bad years. Then, in the same generalities, why are not all Christians TODAY not heralded as the worlds greatest people. Even you have observed the poor being fed in India by peaceful UNARMED missionaries. And I also submit all of the Universities, Colleges and Hospitals serving hundreds of millions in the name of the Christ that is denigrated and belittled and geered at by the Atheists that gleaned their jobs within the walls of those Christian established places of "higher education."

One billion atheists in China, an entire Marxist Eastern Europe that dominated that region for decaeds? South East Asian atheists that commited genocide of countless millions of innocent victims and the list of nameless bodies are uncountable!

So the question should be how do we hold billions of atheists accountable for what billions of atheists have done.

I cannot retract a history I didn't fabricate. The facst are there for everyone to see.

User avatar
bernee51
Site Supporter
Posts: 7813
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Australia

Post #399

Post by bernee51 »

AlAyeti wrote:
. . . And, compare. Let the scales of justice weigh the worth of ideologies that promote killing of innocent people.!
As someone else said - it is not a football match.

All killing in the name of ideology is wrong! All the killing you speak of was done in the name of 'labels'.

The day without labels will be a day of peace.
AlAyeti wrote: But it is the height of ignorance to try to paint the Muslims as peaceful combatants.
No one is claiming they were.
AlAyeti wrote: In fact the history of Arabs and the Holy land speaks of the same throughout time.
Don't I know it - one only need look in the bible for evidence of atrocities in the middle east
AlAyeti wrote: And you see the worlds poor and starving are being fed by Christians. As of right this moment.
As they are by Muslim and humanist organisations.
AlAyeti wrote:
AlAyeti wrote:
. Atheism is intolerant of any opposing views and yet demands diversity of others.
Prove this statement or retract.
The long history of intolerance is stone cold fact. Carved into the walls where once stood the Ten Commandments. How these fairy tales can bother people that will not believe in them proves the intolerance of forcing their removal.
I haven't a clue what this rant means.
AlAyeti wrote: I stand firm with solid evidence in hand.
Only because you say so - no other reason.
Atheism is a disbelief in god(s). What an individual atheism might think is irrelevent to atheism per se.
AlAyeti wrote:
Yet you effortlessly blame every Christian for a few bad years.
A 'few bad years' ROTFLMAO.

No one is blaming 'chrisians' - what must be held to account is ideology and label putting.
AlAyeti wrote: Even you have observed the poor being fed in India by peaceful UNARMED missionaries.
And I have seen the harm done.
"Whatever you are totally ignorant of, assert to be the explanation of everything else"

William James quoting Dr. Hodgson

"When I see I am nothing, that is wisdom. When I see I am everything, that is love. My life is a movement between these two."

Nisargadatta Maharaj

AlAyeti
Guru
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 2:03 pm

Post #400

Post by AlAyeti »

AlAyeti wrote:


. . . And, compare. Let the scales of justice weigh the worth of ideologies that promote killing of innocent people.!

As someone else said - it is not a football match.

All killing in the name of ideology is wrong! All the killing you speak of was done in the name of 'labels'.

The day without labels will be a day of peace.
The day when Christians are not shot to death by Muslims and Hindus, imprisoned in China, and given the right of free exchange of ideas, would see a more peaceful day dawn for in Islamic, Hindu and Communists (atheists) countries.

Not too much Christian Jihad going on in the Bible Belt.
AlAyeti wrote:

But it is the height of ignorance to try to paint the Muslims as peaceful combatants.

No one is claiming they were.
Every person that misapplies the "label" of "Islam the religion of peace." Which has been done here. Subjugation is not exactly the same as freedom. Look up the Islamic word Dhimmi.
AlAyeti wrote:

In fact the history of Arabs and the Holy land speaks of the same throughout time.

Don't I know it - one only need look in the bible for evidence of atrocities in the middle east
I agree, the barbarism of the Arabs continues to this day as accurately as described (as usual) in the Bible.
AlAyeti wrote:

And you see the worlds poor and starving are being fed by Christians. As of right this moment.

As they are by Muslim and humanist organizations.
I'm more than willing to get out that scales of justice to measure your assertion.

AlAyeti wrote:

Quote:
AlAyeti wrote:
. Atheism is intolerant of any opposing views and yet demands diversity of others.

Quote:
Prove this statement or retract.


The long history of intolerance is stone cold fact. Carved into the walls where once stood the Ten Commandments. How these fairy tales can bother people that will not believe in them proves the intolerance of forcing their removal.

I haven't a clue what this rant means.
You cannot click on the ACLU website or look up Michael Newdow on google? What harm do the Ten Commandments actually do?

I thought I spelled it our rather elementary. Why does others believing in something that doesn't exist bother Atheists? The rule of law is clearly derived by Judeo-Christian concepts. Prayers in school by a Muslim or mormon wouldn't bother me as I could refute their "ideologies" with the same gift of free speech rights. As it is, Atheists do not allow for any other way of life except theirs. There is no such thing in America as separation of church and state, yet, you see atheists demanding that the "ideology" of secularism have more authority than anything else.

What ever happened to Democracy? In America.
AlAyeti wrote:
I stand firm with solid evidence in hand.

Only because you say so - no other reason.
You have a calculator handy I'm assuming?

Quote:
Atheism is a disbelief in god(s). What an individual atheism might think is irrelevant to atheism per se.

AlAyeti wrote:

Yet you effortlessly blame every Christian for a few bad years.

A 'few bad years' ROTFLMAO.

No one is blaming 'chrisians' - what must be held to account is ideology and label putting.
You "blame Christians" in the sentence below.
AlAyeti wrote:
Even you have observed the poor being fed in India by peaceful UNARMED missionaries.

And I have seen the harm done.
You have seen the harm dove by Hindus and Muslims that riot over Christianity and not the feeding of the starving by innocent unarmed missionaries. I like blaming ideologies, because their is culpability in complicity.

I'm confident that the Dalit will be raised to first class citizens in the Christian community. Please enlighten the audience to their status within good ol' Hinduism. I'm thinking your direct empiricism will be valuable.

Post Reply