Obama Violating Separation of Church and State?

Two hot topics for the price of one

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Obama Violating Separation of Church and State?

Post #1

Post by East of Eden »

Obama recently attempted to get Pastors to use their pulpit to convince their congregations to go along with the his Health Care Program. He accused the opposition of violating the 9th commandment. He spoke of our obligation to be our brother's keeper.

Shouldn't those of you who oppose Christians trying to get their Biblical views enacted into law in regards to abortion, gay marriage, etc. be equally concerned about this?

It would be nice if Obama would be his own brother's keeper, who last time I checked was still living on $5 a month in Kenya. Perhaps while on vacation at that $20,000,000+ Martha's Vinyard retreat he'll have time to reflect on that.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2576 times

Re: Obama Violating Separation of Church and State?

Post #2

Post by JoeyKnothead »

East of Eden wrote:Obama recently attempted to get Pastors to use their pulpit to convince their congregations to go along with the his Health Care Program. He accused the opposition of violating the 9th commandment. He spoke of our obligation to be our brother's keeper.

Shouldn't those of you who oppose Christians trying to get their Biblical views enacted into law in regards to abortion, gay marriage, etc. be equally concerned about this?

It would be nice if Obama would be his own brother's keeper, who last time I checked was still living on $5 a month in Kenya. Perhaps while on vacation at that $20,000,000+ Martha's Vinyard retreat he'll have time to reflect on that.
I would agree that politics should not be preached from tax exempt institutions.

About the brother's keeper deal, I can only conclude Obama has his reasons, just as I have one of my brothers I consider dead to me.

What does the value of a retreat have to do with anything?
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: Obama Violating Separation of Church and State?

Post #3

Post by East of Eden »

joeyknuccione wrote:
East of Eden wrote:Obama recently attempted to get Pastors to use their pulpit to convince their congregations to go along with the his Health Care Program. He accused the opposition of violating the 9th commandment. He spoke of our obligation to be our brother's keeper.

Shouldn't those of you who oppose Christians trying to get their Biblical views enacted into law in regards to abortion, gay marriage, etc. be equally concerned about this?

It would be nice if Obama would be his own brother's keeper, who last time I checked was still living on $5 a month in Kenya. Perhaps while on vacation at that $20,000,000+ Martha's Vinyard retreat he'll have time to reflect on that.
I would agree that politics should not be preached from tax exempt institutions.

About the brother's keeper deal, I can only conclude Obama has his reasons, just as I have one of my brothers I consider dead to me.

What does the value of a retreat have to do with anything?
It indicates Obama's hypocrisy in not helping his own brother is not due to a lack of resources.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

User avatar
GentleDove
Apprentice
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 1:22 am
Location: Pacific Northwest, USA

Re: Obama Violating Separation of Church and State?

Post #4

Post by GentleDove »

East of Eden wrote:Obama recently attempted to get Pastors to use their pulpit to convince their congregations to go along with the his Health Care Program. He accused the opposition of violating the 9th commandment. He spoke of our obligation to be our brother's keeper.
Obama is wrong"health care is not the civil governments jurisdiction. The civil government is not our brother"unless its Big Brother?

In addition, look at the history of civil government involvement with health care; every time they pass some health care act, the prices for medical care rise, while the service goes down (government-required HMOs, government-required insurance plans, etc.). I doubt people really want medical care facilities to be run like the Post Office or the DMV.

Of course, families should pay for their own health and sickness care, through savings, insurance, or cost-sharing plans, and if they cant then the church and/or church-run charities should care for the sick/pay for care. Thats what being our brothers keeper means, not participating in Obamas attempt at socialist-fascism. If pastors should be urging anything from the pulpit, it should be urging their congregations and other churches to form health care alliances, home health care, and voluntary cost-sharing plans"and preach the rejection of socialism and fascist, government-run "businesses."

If refusing to be in the pocket of fascist dictators means giving up tax-exempt status"so be it. Then preach Biblical politics to the people"and get those oppressive tax laws repealed. Let Christians put their money toward actually helping people through private enterprise and voluntary charity for the sake of the gospel, instead of civil government-run money pits that never deliver the goods.

By idolizing the state, Obama is breaking the 1st commandment. And he seems overly interested in aborting the unborn and "euthanizing" the elderly in violation of the 6th commandment. With his socialist Health Care solution (and other socialist programs) he is in violation of the 8th commandment.

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2576 times

Re: Obama Violating Separation of Church and State?

Post #5

Post by JoeyKnothead »

East of Eden wrote:
joeyknuccione wrote:
East of Eden wrote:Obama recently attempted to get Pastors to use their pulpit to convince their congregations to go along with the his Health Care Program. He accused the opposition of violating the 9th commandment. He spoke of our obligation to be our brother's keeper.

Shouldn't those of you who oppose Christians trying to get their Biblical views enacted into law in regards to abortion, gay marriage, etc. be equally concerned about this?

It would be nice if Obama would be his own brother's keeper, who last time I checked was still living on $5 a month in Kenya. Perhaps while on vacation at that $20,000,000+ Martha's Vinyard retreat he'll have time to reflect on that.
I would agree that politics should not be preached from tax exempt institutions.

About the brother's keeper deal, I can only conclude Obama has his reasons, just as I have one of my brothers I consider dead to me.

What does the value of a retreat have to do with anything?
It indicates Obama's hypocrisy in not helping his own brother is not due to a lack of resources.
Gotcha, and I agree it does seem hypocritical, whether he owns it or pays the huge rent one can reasonably assume he could spend his money in a more "giving" fashion.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2576 times

Post #6

Post by JoeyKnothead »

From Page 1 Post 4:
GentleDove wrote: Obama is wrong"health care is not the civil governments jurisdiction. The civil government is not our brother"unless its Big Brother?
I propose government's jurisdiction is what we the folks allow. In this case I contend decent medical care should be a right for all.
GentleDove wrote: In addition, look at the history of civil government involvement with health care; every time they pass some health care act, the prices for medical care rise, while the service goes down (government-required HMOs, government-required insurance plans, etc.). I doubt people really want medical care facilities to be run like the Post Office or the DMV.
I think it's more about insuring folks, and not so much running hospitals.
GentleDove wrote: Of course, families should pay for their own health and sickness care, through savings, insurance, or cost-sharing plans, and if they cant then the church and/or church-run charities should care for the sick/pay for care.
Unfortunately not enough churches are offering enough folks this care.

I do agree it would be great if this would occur - as long as folks were not unduly burdened with proselytizing.
GentleDove wrote: If refusing to be in the pocket of fascist dictators means giving up tax-exempt status"so be it.
Hyperbole has no place in reasoned debate.

No one is proposing we all put on swastikas.
GentleDove wrote: Let Christians put their money toward actually helping people through private enterprise and voluntary charity for the sake of the gospel, instead of civil government-run money pits that never deliver the goods.
Funny, that's what I think of organized religion.
GentleDove wrote: By idolizing the state, Obama is breaking the 1st commandment.
If only someone could offer verifiable evidence their proposed God is a jealous god, fearful of all other gods.
GentleDove wrote: And he seems overly interested in aborting the unborn and "euthanizing" the elderly in violation of the 6th commandment.
LOL The "death panel" myth lives.
GentleDove wrote: With his socialist Health Care solution (and other socialist programs) he is in violation of the 8th commandment.
If only someone could offer verifiable evidence their proposed God doesn't like idols, or likes folks to keep days "holy", whichever.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Post #7

Post by East of Eden »

joeyknuccione wrote: LOL The "death panel" myth lives.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/ ... _bill.html

Whatever you think about Obama's proposal, we don't have the $1,000,000,000,000 for it. Medicare has actually cost 10 times more than originally predicted. There is no reason to think that wouldn't happen to Obama's proposal.

Medicare is already paying out more than it takes in, Social Security will do so soon. Shouldn't we fix those first?
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2576 times

Post #8

Post by JoeyKnothead »

East of Eden wrote:
joeyknuccione wrote: LOL The "death panel" myth lives.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/ ... _bill.html

Whatever you think about Obama's proposal, we don't have the $1,000,000,000,000 for it. Medicare has actually cost 10 times more than originally predicted. There is no reason to think that wouldn't happen to Obama's proposal.

Medicare is already paying out more than it takes in, Social Security will do so soon. Shouldn't we fix those first?
Now dangit, we were finally agreeing on something :)

I consider the right of universal health care to be separate from what Medicare and Social Security are doing.

If we're gonna make these kinds of comparisons then I've gotta mention the relatively terrific care our soldiers and soldiers' families receive.

Of course there is always room for improvement in any system. My contention here is there is room for improvement in a system that leaves so many without decent medical care.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Post #9

Post by East of Eden »

joeyknuccione wrote: Now dangit, we were finally agreeing on something :)

I consider the right of universal health care
Can I ask, where is this 'right' found in the Constitution?
to be separate from what Medicare and Social Security are doing.

If we're gonna make these kinds of comparisons then I've gotta mention the relatively terrific care our soldiers and soldiers' families receive.
I think that's different, as we are knowingly sending them into harm's way where
they are likely to be injured.
Of course there is always room for improvement in any system. My contention here is there is room for improvement in a system that leaves so many without decent medical care.
There is a lot of room for improvement, why doesn't Obama ever mention tort reform? I read that 20-25% of medical tests ordered by doctors are not for medical reasons but because of fear of lawsuits.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2576 times

Post #10

Post by JoeyKnothead »

From Page 1 Post 9"
joeyknuccione wrote: I consider the right of universal health care...
East of Eden wrote: Can I ask, where is this 'right' found in the Constitution?
I've never thought we should be bound by ancient documents. I consider this 'right' to be an extension of a society that prides itself on its people.
joeyknuccione wrote: If we're gonna make these kinds of comparisons then I've gotta mention the relatively terrific care our soldiers and soldiers' families receive.
East of Eden wrote: I think that's different, as we are knowingly sending them into harm's way where
they are likely to be injured.
My point was to show a government program with a high level of success.
East of Eden wrote: There is a lot of room for improvement, why doesn't Obama ever mention tort reform? I read that 20-25% of medical tests ordered by doctors are not for medical reasons but because of fear of lawsuits.
Then include these concerns with universal healthcare, but don't toss one great notion because another notion hasn't turned out the way one likes.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

Post Reply