The Delusion of Evolution

Creationism, Evolution, and other science issues

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
Neandertal Ned
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:42 pm

The Delusion of Evolution

Post #1

Post by Neandertal Ned »

There is plenty of evidence that the so-called "process" of evoution is more of a delusion than a real biological process. It is a delusion in the sense that you can only imagine a species of one genus "evolving" into the species of an entirely different animal genus by "natural selection" alone since no one has ever observed it to happen "naturally" in real life. Until physically demonstrated to have ever happened on earth let alone that is physically possible nowadays or at some distant time in the future, it can only be called a mass delusion on the part of the so-called "scientific community."

http://atheismisdead.blogspot.com/2009/ ... ution.html

http://www.god-book.com/TheEvolutionDelusion.htm



http://evolutiondelusion.blogspot.com/

Do you have any doubts or objections to evolution being classified as a mass delusion or modern myth?

derwood
Apprentice
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:24 am

Re: The Delusion of Evolution

Post #121

Post by derwood »

Neandertal Ned wrote:
derwood wrote: Then apparently your Flood took place in North Dakota.
Apparently so since it explains the existence of the geologic column there.
So I guess you just admitted that the bible is not 100% correct.

Bravo!
I'm not the one arguing about a geologic column. You folks are asking "Where is it???" when you SHOULD be arguing "It is all over!"
How can you argue that the column is "all over" when there is no evidence that it is all over?
Is this an act?

I am NOT arguing this, I am saying that YECs SHOULD be, if they have any sense or intellectual integrity.
There are stratified layers of rock all over the world but none of them can be said to represent the chronological layers which are supposed to be in the so-called "geologic column."
Then this argues against a young earth and flood.
That the 'complete' geologic column is only found in a few places is a testament to the falsity of a young earth model.
False. It is a testament to the falsity of a local geological model being used to represent the chronological order of sedimentary rock formations all over the earth.
False.

If there really had been a world wide flood that covered the earth to the tallest mountain for a year or so about 4,500 years ago, then a complete and intact logic column should be the norm all over the world.

Lay creationists are simply not sophisticated enough to realize this; professional creationists are too busy trying to cover up the fact that they have no evidence to worry about the self-defeating nature of their desperate arguments.

Post Reply