Expelled (No Intelligence Allowed) - Documentary

Creationism, Evolution, and other science issues

Moderator: Moderators

Jason Trivium
Student
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2013 4:46 pm
Contact:

Expelled (No Intelligence Allowed) - Documentary

Post #1

Post by Jason Trivium »

For those of you who might not know, the entire film Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed is now on You Tube.



What do you think, are the media and our public schools suppressing scientific truth in favor of a liberal/Secular/Atheist worldview?
1 Corinthians 1:17-31; Proverbs 3:5-6; Isaiah 46:10

Before You Debate Me…

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Expelled (No Intelligence Allowed) - Documentary

Post #31

Post by Goat »

Iam wrote:
East of Eden wrote:
Iam wrote:
East of Eden wrote:
Jason Trivium wrote: For those of you who might not know, the entire film Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed is now on You Tube.



What do you think, are the media and our public schools suppressing scientific truth in favor of a liberal/Secular/Atheist worldview?
Thanks for posting, what a great film.
Yep and the title is so truthful.
You don't often get that
Funny the naturalistic evolutionists are so outraged by this film, half of it is just publicizing their own worlds. How embarrassing.
So if I was a naturalistic evolutionist I would be outraged by this flic? Good thing I'm a realist and I just find it to be quaintly amusing.
Yes, you should be outraged that the people got away with mispresenting so many people. You know, they wouldn't even let one of the people who they interviewed to go into the preview of it (P.Z. Myer) http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/03/20/expelled/

They, of course, there is the quote mining, the lying to the people they intereviewed, and a host of other problems with it.,
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

Post Reply