Isn’t it true that Hemoglobin breaks down rather quickly and could not last for millions upon millions of years?
So, just how does traces of the blood protein hemogloben recovered by scientists at Montana State University from a T-Rex’s trabecular tissue exist for over 80+MY’s without being fossilized or completely disintegrating?
Doesn't the evidence indicate that this T-Rex died not to long ago?
Hemo compounds and dinosaurs= problems.
Moderator: Moderators
Post #2
Not that I know of. I don't know much about it, from what source did you learn that?Isn’t it true that Hemoglobin breaks down rather quickly and could not last for millions upon millions of years?
We'll keep this point in the air, until you address my previous one.So, just how does traces of the blood protein hemogloben recovered by scientists at Montana State University from a T-Rex’s trabecular tissue exist for over 80+MY’s without being fossilized or completely disintegrating?
The TOE of does not require that animals die out. You could produce a living T-rex and it wouldn't matter one bit to the TOE.Doesn't the evidence indicate that this T-Rex died not to long ago?
Sorry. Even if everything you've said here is true, and that you could produce for me a thousand living T-rex, evolution isn't threatened.
Post #3
Nyril wrote:Not that I know of. I don't know much about it, from what source did you learn that?Isn’t it true that Hemoglobin breaks down rather quickly and could not last for millions upon millions of years?
With in 1 million years just about everything biological breaks down...not multiply that by 80....it's pretty much common sense.
Can you provide a reference that suggest it won't?
We'll keep this point in the air, until you address my previous one.So, just how does traces of the blood protein hemogloben recovered by scientists at Montana State University from a T-Rex’s trabecular tissue exist for over 80+MY’s without being fossilized or completely disintegrating?
Consider it addressed untill you can prove otherwise.
The TOE of does not require that animals die out. You could produce a living T-rex and it wouldn't matter one bit to the TOE.Doesn't the evidence indicate that this T-Rex died not to long ago?
The strata that the T-rex was found in was used to date the heme....this is a problem for you evos.
Sorry. Even if everything you've said here is true, and that you could produce for me a thousand living T-rex, evolution isn't threatened.
Re: Hemo compounds and dinosaurs= problems.
Post #4Source?YEC wrote:Isn’t it true that Hemoglobin breaks down rather quickly and could not last for millions upon millions of years?
So, just how does traces of the blood protein hemogloben recovered by scientists at Montana State University from a T-Rex’s trabecular tissue exist for over 80+MY’s without being fossilized or completely disintegrating?
Doesn't the evidence indicate that this T-Rex died not to long ago?
If i remember correctly they found heme, and hemoglobin only in fragments. Heme is quite resistant, and the bone was exceptionally well preserved.
jwu
Post #6
Heme being able to survive for 65 million years doesn't mean that it has to do so very often. If we find another bone as well preserved as the one in which that heme was found, then there might be a good chance that there is some, but there doesn't have to be.
jwu
jwu
Post #8
Yeesh.
From your post:
jwu
From your post:
From the article which you gave as your source:Isn’t it true that Hemoglobin breaks down rather quickly and could not last for millions upon millions of years?
So, just how does traces of the blood protein hemogloben recovered by scientists at Montana State University from a T-Rex’s trabecular tissue exist for over 80+MY’s without being fossilized or completely disintegrating?
The article itself says that it's broken down, you however made it sound like it was found intact - in traces, but intact.Six independent lines of evidence point to the existence of heme-containing compounds and/or hemoglobin breakdown products in extracts of trabecular tissues of the large theropod dinosaur Tyrannosaurus rex.
jwu
Post #10
Finding it...once....is not considered as very often.jwu wrote:Heme being able to survive for 65 million years doesn't mean that it has to do so very often. If we find another bone as well preserved as the one in which that heme was found, then there might be a good chance that there is some, but there doesn't have to be.
jwu
