The Delusion of Evolution

[Neandertal Ned]

There is plenty of evidence that the so-called "process" of evoution is more of a delusion than a real biological process. It is a delusion in the sense that you can only imagine a species of one genus "evolving" into the species of an entirely different animal genus by "natural selection" alone since no one has ever observed it to happen "naturally" in real life. Until physically demonstrated to have ever happened on earth let alone that is physically possible nowadays or at some distant time in the future, it can only be called a mass delusion on the part of the so-called "scientific community."

http://atheismisdead.blogspot.com/2009/ ... ution.html

http://www.god-book.com/TheEvolutionDelusion.htm



http://evolutiondelusion.blogspot.com/

Do you have any doubts or objections to evolution being classified as a mass delusion or modern myth?

[LiamOS]

There is plenty of evidence that the so-called "process" of evoution is more of a delusion than a real biological process. It is a delusion in the sense that you can only imagine a species of one genus "evolving" into the species of an entirely different animal genus by "natural selection" alone since no one has ever observed it to happen "naturally" in real life. Until physically demonstrated to have ever happened on earth let alone that is physically possible nowadays or at some distant time in the future, it can only be called a mass delusion on the part of the so-called "scientific community."

http://atheismisdead.blogspot.com/2009/ ... ution.html

http://www.god-book.com/TheEvolutionDelusion.htm



http://evolutiondelusion.blogspot.com/

Do you have any doubts or objections to evolution being classified as a mass delusion or modern myth?

There is plenty of evidence if we consider the rants of fringe-pseudoscientists valid evidence.
Otherwise, no; not really.

[/thread]

[Furrowed Brow]

There is plenty of evidence that the so-called "process" of evoution is more of a delusion than a real biological process. It is a delusion in the sense that you can only imagine a species of one genus "evolving" into the species of an entirely different animal genus by "natural selection" alone since no one has ever observed it to happen "naturally" in real life.

By that measure neither has anyone seen the formation of limestone. It would then be a delusion to think limestone was formed say from calcite and the skeletons of marine animals over time. We did not see it happen therefore its bonkers to think it happened. And no matter what experiment or observation or line of reasoning we perfomed in the now on the scale of the human lifespan we would be kidding ourselves because we did not see it in situ as it happened.

Until physically demonstrated to have ever happened on earth let alone that is physically possible nowadays or at some distant time in the future, it can only be called a mass delusion on the part of the so-called "scientific community."

It is a delusion in the same way geology is a delusion. Which is to that this delusion is as solid as rock.

Do you have any doubts or objections to evolution being classified as a mass delusion or modern myth?

Just a few. But there is a very little that can be said to folk who insist on a logic that thinks it is unjustified to take observation and data we have in the now and work back.

[Artie]

There is plenty of evidence that the so-called "process" of evoution is more of a delusion than a real biological process. It is a delusion in the sense that you can only imagine a species of one genus "evolving" into the species of an entirely different animal genus by "natural selection" alone since no one has ever observed it to happen "naturally" in real life.

I wasn't aware that evolution says that one species of one genus could evolve into a species of an entirely different animal genus where does it say that?

[Woland]

Yes.

Virtually all biologists are delusional.

When they tell you that there is plenty of evidence for evolution, they really have no clue what they are talking about.

Same for the thousands of papers published each year on the topic.
Nothing to see there.

Fringe dogmatists reading from a bronze-age book know better than scientists working in the field what "really" constitutes science.

Similarly, to convict anyone of a rape-murder with no witnesses is completely delusional, even if you have sperm DNA, fingerprints, a motive, the murder weapon, and no alibi.

Ah, those silly, silly biologists and their claims that evolution is supported by thousands of individual pieces of converging evidence from all relevant scientific fields.

-Woland

[Evointrinsic]

Yes.

Virtually all biologists are delusional.

When they tell you that there is plenty of evidence for evolution, they really have no clue what they are talking about.

Same for the thousands of papers published each year on the topic.
Nothing to see there.

Fringe dogmatists reading from a bronze-age book know better than scientists working in the field what "really" constitutes science.

Similarly, to convict anyone of a rape-murder with no witnesses is completely delusional, even if you have sperm DNA, fingerprints, a motive, the murder weapon, and no alibi.

Ah, those silly, silly biologists and their claims that evolution is supported by thousands of individual pieces of converging evidence from all relevant scientific fields.

-Woland

Blasphemer!!!!





On topic however. Your lack of understanding of the concept of something in which you are arguing is ridiculously idiotic (Ned). Perhaps you should attempt to use the brain which I assume you have (maybe not considering this topic) and think for yourself instead of blindly accepting any nonsensical information that's thrown at you that attempts to strengthen your side and instantly repeating it as fact without bothering to find out if the information hasn't already been brutally disproved time and time again.

[Neandertal Ned]

There is plenty of evidence that the so-called "process" of evoution is more of a delusion than a real biological process. It is a delusion in the sense that you can only imagine a species of one genus "evolving" into the species of an entirely different animal genus by "natural selection" alone since no one has ever observed it to happen "naturally" in real life.

By that measure neither has anyone seen the formation of limestone. It would then be a delusion to think limestone was formed say from calcite and the skeletons of marine animals over time. We did not see it happen therefore its bonkers to think it happened. And no matter what experiment or observation or line of reasoning we perfomed in the now on the scale of the human lifespan we would be kidding ourselves because we did not see it in situ as it happened.

The formative processes of coral and limestone are similar and coral is still observed to be growing today.

http://www.teachingboxes.org/seaLevel/l ... /index.htm

It is a delusion in the same way geology is a delusion. Which is to that this delusion is as solid as rock.

Geologic time is a delusion, as is the worldwide geologic column.

http://www.creationworldview.org/articl ... .asp?id=42

Just a few. But there is a very little that can be said to folk who insist on a logic that thinks it is unjustified to take observation and data we have in the now and work back.

So you choose not to express doubts or objections to evolution being classified as a mass delusion or modern myth?

[Neandertal Ned]

There is plenty of evidence that the so-called "process" of evoution is more of a delusion than a real biological process. It is a delusion in the sense that you can only imagine a species of one genus "evolving" into the species of an entirely different animal genus by "natural selection" alone since no one has ever observed it to happen "naturally" in real life.

I wasn't aware that evolution says that one species of one genus could evolve into a species of an entirely different animal genus where does it say that?

Well, you assume that the first "species" of the genus Homo, "evolved" from a species of African apes in the genus of Australopithicus, don't you? At least that is what most Darwinists are theorizing these days. Where have you been, Artie?

http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo/homo_1.htm

[Furrowed Brow]

The formative processes of coral and limestone are similar and coral is still observed to be growing today.

How is it possible to accept something that is not exactly the same and only similar as a supporting argument, and also argue evolution is a delusion because......

...no one has ever observed it to happen "naturally" in real life.

When all you can muster is a similar process to limestone formation. How the heck is it similar if...using your own logic....you have never seen limestone formation happen.

Geologic time is a delusion, as is the worldwide geologic column.

Whether it took hundreds of millions years or 6,000 years to never witness it for real it is delusion...by your own logic.

So you choose not to express doubts or objections to evolution being classified as a mass delusion or modern myth?

Once my objections have been met and answered honestly and directly without evasion, equivocation, deflection or sophism then yes certainly.

[Neandertal Ned]

The formative processes of coral and limestone are similar and coral is still observed to be growing today.

How is it possible to accept something that is not exactly the same and only similar as a supporting argument, and also argue evolution is a delusion because......

...no one has ever observed it to happen "naturally" in real life.

When all you can muster is a similar process to limestone formation. How the heck is it similar if...using your own logic....you have never seen limestone formation happen.

The chemical process of the formation of coral and limestone seems to be the same.

http://geology.com/rocks/limestone.shtml

Geologic time is a delusion, as is the worldwide geologic column.

Whether it took hundreds of millions years or 6,000 years to never witness it for real it is delusion...by your own logic.

Only the claim of millions of years would be a delusion since there is no human experience of millions of years. The claim of 6000 years would not be a delusion in terms of recorded time.

So you choose not to express doubts or objections to evolution being classified as a mass delusion or modern myth?

Once my objections have been met and answered honestly and directly without evasion, equivocation, deflection or sophism then yes certainly.

So you are expressing your objections and doubts after all.

Fair enough. That is what I also do when expressing my doubts and objections to Darwinism.