Some Atheists lack inner motivation for make believe?

Creationism, Evolution, and other science issues

Moderator: Moderators

ndf8th
Sage
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:13 am
Location: North Europe

Some Atheists lack inner motivation for make believe?

Post #1

Post by ndf8th »

Some Atheists lack inner motivation for make believe?

Suppose religion is the art of make believe. Clifford Geertz explain in
Anthropology of religion the make believe acts of faith like this:
Anthropology of religion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropology_of_religion
(1) a system of symbols which acts to
(2) establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by
(3) formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and
(4) clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that
(5) the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic" (Geertz 1966).
I find what he says there to support that faith in God is an act of make believe.

Some Atheists lack the inner motivation for to make such belief.

I have the inner motivation for to make believe but I lack the needed know how.

Edit

Did you notice that I do Anthropology of religion
and that I don't do "Does God exist of philosophic Ontology
and I don't do Does the atheists lack belief in gods.

I start with the soft science Anthropology of religion
and take their most famous or agreed upon definition of religion
and then look at if atheists have that inner motivation and conclude
that they lack such inner motivation. It is a huge difference as I get it.

the soft science do say that religions are made by us humans.
that means that the gods are made by these humans. Make believe gods.

So to ask if these gods exist is to not understand
that believers have inner motivation to make believe that God exist.


Edit 2
if you are good at logic and English then please translate this to less abstract words

(1) a system of symbols which acts to
(2) establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by
(3) formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and
(4) clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that
(5) the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic" (Geertz 1966)

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Some Atheists lack inner motivation for make believe?

Post #2

Post by Goat »

ndf8th wrote: Some Atheists lack inner motivation for make believe?

Suppose religion is the art of make believe. Clifford Geertz explain in
Anthropology of religion the make believe acts of faith like this:
Anthropology of religion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropology_of_religion
(1) a system of symbols which acts to
(2) establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by
(3) formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and
(4) clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that
(5) the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic" (Geertz 1966).
I find what he says there to support that faith in God is an act of make believe.

Some Atheists lack the inner motivation for to make such belief.

I have the inner motivation for to make believe but I lack the needed know how.

Edit

Did you notice that I do Anthropology of religion
and that I don't do "Does God exist of philosophic Ontology
and I don't do Does the atheists lack belief in gods.

I start with the soft science Anthropology of religion
and take their most famous or agreed upon definition of religion
and then look at if atheists have that inner motivation and conclude
that they lack such inner motivation. It is a huge difference as I get it.

the soft science do say that religions are made by us humans.
that means that the gods are made by these humans. Make believe gods.

So to ask if these gods exist is to not understand
that believers have inner motivation to make believe that God exist.


Edit 2
if you are good at logic and English then please translate this to less abstract words

(1) a system of symbols which acts to
(2) establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by
(3) formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and
(4) clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that
(5) the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic" (Geertz 1966)
Not at all. It is just that they don't give emotional importance to that make believe. There are tons of atheists that play RPG, and belong to recreationist groups , that recreate the middle ages, colonial life, etc etc etc. (skipping all the bad parts, of course). Some atheists I know love going to the Renn fairs.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
10CC
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1595
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2013 9:51 am
Location: Godzone

Re: Some Atheists lack inner motivation for make believe?

Post #3

Post by 10CC »

Goat wrote:
ndf8th wrote: Some Atheists lack inner motivation for make believe?

Suppose religion is the art of make believe. Clifford Geertz explain in
Anthropology of religion the make believe acts of faith like this:
Anthropology of religion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropology_of_religion
(1) a system of symbols which acts to
(2) establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by
(3) formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and
(4) clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that
(5) the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic" (Geertz 1966).
I find what he says there to support that faith in God is an act of make believe.

Some Atheists lack the inner motivation for to make such belief.

I have the inner motivation for to make believe but I lack the needed know how.

Edit

Did you notice that I do Anthropology of religion
and that I don't do "Does God exist of philosophic Ontology
and I don't do Does the atheists lack belief in gods.

I start with the soft science Anthropology of religion
and take their most famous or agreed upon definition of religion
and then look at if atheists have that inner motivation and conclude
that they lack such inner motivation. It is a huge difference as I get it.

the soft science do say that religions are made by us humans.
that means that the gods are made by these humans. Make believe gods.

So to ask if these gods exist is to not understand
that believers have inner motivation to make believe that God exist.


Edit 2
if you are good at logic and English then please translate this to less abstract words

(1) a system of symbols which acts to
(2) establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by
(3) formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and
(4) clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that
(5) the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic" (Geertz 1966)
Not at all. It is just that they don't give emotional importance to that make believe. There are tons of atheists that play RPG, and belong to recreationist groups , that recreate the middle ages, colonial life, etc etc etc. (skipping all the bad parts, of course). Some atheists I know love going to the Renn fairs.
Pardon my antipodean ignorance Mr Goat, but what is a Renn Fair?

User avatar
Nilloc James
Site Supporter
Posts: 1696
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:53 am
Location: Canada

Post #4

Post by Nilloc James »

I love religous texts as what they are - texts.

I see no need to force them to be true. They become ugly when you force them to be true.

I like literature as literature? Does that mean I hate make believe?

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Some Atheists lack inner motivation for make believe?

Post #5

Post by Goat »

[Replying to post 3 by 10CC]

A Renaissance Faire. You get a whole bunch of people dressing up in medieval costumes, and making a big show, to divest the poor suckers of their hard earned cash.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

User avatar
Divine Insight
Savant
Posts: 18070
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Here & Now
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Some Atheists lack inner motivation for make believe?

Post #6

Post by Divine Insight »

ndf8th wrote: So to ask if these gods exist is to not understand
that believers have inner motivation to make believe that God exist.
I agree with part of what you are saying. Both, a creative ability for make-believe, and a desire to believe in these fantasies, are required for a successful spiritual experience. Although the former may actually be waived if a person is willing to believe in someone else's fantasy. In fact, this is what most religious people actually do. They seek out fantasy that are already well-defined and have already been created.

It's also true that it's more fun when other people share in the fantasy. This is another reason why social religion are more meaningful for people. In fact, some people can't even understand why anyone would want to make up their own fantasy, because for them it wouldn't seem as "real" as a fantasy that had already been made up and has been around for a very long time.

This is one reason why people prefer ancient fantasies. The older the better because the longer its been around the more secure it is in having been believed by more people.

But yes, fantasy is the key to spirituality. There's no question about this. One of the greatest things that helped me was when I read a book on Wicca by a woman who was explaining how to perform a circle ritual. She said that it must be done with the innocent of a young child. Precisely the way a young child would have an imaginary tea party with imaginary friends. That is where the real magick come from.

This is actually a really interesting topic for me. I would love to teach classes on this particular subject. I've studied it and feel that I have a lot to offer people who are beginning to understand how this works.

I'll take a stab at dissecting the technical talk below:

ndf8th wrote: Edit 2
if you are good at logic and English then please translate this to less abstract words

(1) a system of symbols which acts to
(2) establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by
(3) formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and
(4) clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that
(5) the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic" (Geertz 1966)

It's not about logic and English. It's about understanding how psychic archetypes work and how to construct them so that they will come alive for you.

(1) a system of symbols

There are two different aspect here. One is the system also known as the paradigm. The paradigm is the overall storyline of the fantasy.

Who are the characters?
What do they represent?
Is there a creation story with this fantasy?
Is there a purpose?

The list goes on. This is the system or paradigm

In Christianity for example you have the characters. The Father God, The Holy Spirit, Jesus, The Virgin Mary, Satan, Angels, Saints, etc. Clearly they each represent different things. There is clearly a creation story in the beginning too. I'm not sure of the actual purpose, the purpose in Christianity seems rather vague, other than the God wants humans to be in his heavenly Kingdom for some reason.

In Wicca the paradigms differ somewhat between various witches because Wicca is far more open and flexible. Still it typically has the following structure: There is a God and Goddess. The Goddess is typically of more interest in Wicca, not necessarily more important than the God, just more center-stage for a number of reasons. Typically, just like Christianity has angels, saints and demons, Wicca too offers a wide variety of characters to choose from for those roles.

The idea is not to get too bogged down on the importance of the characters. The characters are only symbols that help the system work.

In fact, I wanted to address symbols next, although this is a really deep topic. But the characters in any religion are the symbols often called "archetypes".

For example in my own personal system of Wicca, I have four pixie fairies that act as the gentiles or gate-keepers to the four gates of consciousness. These four gates are also associated with the compass directions, North, East, South, and West, as well as the four spiritual elements of Earth, Air, Fire, and Water.

These pixie sentinels open these gates of psychic consciousness and bring them to life. The four pixies in my Wicca paradigm are named, Assiah, Yetzirah, Atziluth, and Briah.

Once the four gates of psychic consciousness are open I call upon the four archangels, Arial, Raphael, Michael, and Gabriel. Again, each one associated with the four compass direction. Then I call upon the four Goddesses, Gaia, Cerridwen, Hecate, and Artemis. Finally I call upon for God archetypes. These aren't really Gods but they represent an aspect of the God. They are Cernnunos, Merlin, Taliesin, and Eros, along with psyche (she comes with Eros naturally).

So that's basically my overall paradigm. That's just the basis.


(2)which acts to establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men


Now that a paradigm has been created the next thing is to actually use it. And that is done via psychic journeying. You can also think of it as shamanic journeying. These are very similar psychic techniques.

In short, if you build it they will come.

If you create this paradigm in your mind the spirit will come to life. For this reason many Christians have brought their psychic visions of Christianity to life in their minds. Christianity can work as well as any other fantasy.

I think it's important to like the fantasy you work with. ;)

I personally do much better with Wicca than I ever did with Christianity. But that's just me.


(3) by formulating conceptions of a general order of existence


Your psychic paradigm is your way of organizing your reality. It's not a cop-out from reality, it's a psychic enhancement to reality. I particularly love Wicca, because it has so many wonderful things to explore. In addition to the psychic paradigm I outlined above I also use Tarot cards, a Celtic Qabala, A faery well, and many other psychic tools.

How powerful it becomes for you is entirely related to how deeply you become involved with it on both a psychic an emotional level.


(4) clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that
(5) the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic"


Yes, these psychic journeys become as real as dreams with the difference that you are actually awake and aware whilst dreaming and interacting with the characters in your dreams.

Is it make-believe?

Well, yes, it starts out that way. That's the very best way to get started.

But then the experiences become real. They become realistic experiences.

These experiences can also reflect back to you the inner workings of your own subconscious mind. Although some people think of this as being the mind of other spirits, or even the mind of God. It's really exciting when you feel that you have truly contacted totally separate consciousnesses from yourself. Whether this is actually happening or not is anyone's guess. Some people can be more easily fooled by their on imagination than others.

I have had some profound experiences myself. And sometimes it really felt like I was meeting with other entities. But in truth, I cannot say with certainty that any of the entities I've ever met in my psychic journeys were anything other than my very own consciousness. No spirit has yet giving me tomorrow's lottery number.

When that happens I'll be convinced. ;)

But even so, psychic journeying is a whole lot of fun even if it's only sophisticated day-dreaming to gain introspection into my own being.

It seems to me that it even has secular value. I mean, even if we are nothing but biological computers, it can still be fun exploring the depths of our own biological computer.

So whether it's actually spiritual or not, it still has practical value.

So this is something I would love to teach. I feel that it's something worth learning too.
[center]Image
Spiritual Growth - A person's continual assessment
of how well they believe they are doing
relative to what they believe a personal God expects of them.
[/center]

ndf8th
Sage
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:13 am
Location: North Europe

Re: Some Atheists lack inner motivation for make believe?

Post #7

Post by ndf8th »

[Replying to 10CC]

I used google and maybe get what they are but he refer to RPG
and Renn is maybe a variant of that?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Role-playing_game
a game in which players assume the roles of characters in a fictional setting.
Yes I have heard of such and knew one involved but I am no actor sorry.

But AFAIK they pretend and don't really make believe do they?

Okay those that are very good at pretending maybe perceive it as very real?

Good example was the experiments that Zimbardo made with his students
as Guards and prisoners? The Guards took it so seriously they actually did
hurt the prisoners very badly. It became so real that his wife asked if it was
morally defensible to let them go on hurting the pretend prisoners.

So RPG can get rather real. But does these atheists really believe in God
when they play they are a believer?

ndf8th
Sage
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:13 am
Location: North Europe

Post #8

Post by ndf8th »

[Replying to post 4 by Nilloc James]

You being good at reading and getting text

what do you make of this text then?

(1) a system of symbols which acts to
(2) establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by
(3) formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and
(4) clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that
(5) the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic" (Geertz 1966).

ndf8th
Sage
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:13 am
Location: North Europe

Post #9

Post by ndf8th »

Much thanks to Divine Insight for sharing your personal experiences
and your understanding of the words from Clifford Geertz.

I may disagree on details but don't know if my take on him
is more accurate I only feel it is. :) So much appreciated
that you gave your retelling.

I would want a lay person variety of his text that is as short as his :)
Divine Insight you don't have to I ask all of us to see that as a challenge
and I am embarrassed that I fail to. it should be possible.

ndf8th
Sage
Posts: 517
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:13 am
Location: North Europe

Post #10

Post by ndf8th »

I fail to find words because I am a confused thinker.

But suppose that I have been a formal atheist now for some 55 years plus or minus.

I mean does one get enough to be atheist at ten years old? Should one
start at 18 maybe and not at ten years? When are one mature enough to get such things? :)

Consider and take to heart now that during all these 55 plus years
that we knew about Anthropology of religion through Ludwig Feuerbach.
as early as 1841 or at least we had Clifford Geertz words since 1966.
2013 - 1966 = 47 years of Anthropology of religion.


Why did we ignore Clifford Geertz and accepted the book by George Smith of 1974?
atheism: the case against God.

Anthropology vs Philosophy.

What is it about Philosophy that atheists prefer it to Anthropology of religion?

Post Reply