A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

fatherlearningtolove
Apprentice
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:33 pm
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Contact:

Post #471

Post by fatherlearningtolove »

JohnA wrote:
fatherlearningtolove wrote: [Replying to post 462 by JohnA]

I would like you to try two thought exercises.

Exercise 1: I don't believe in George Washington. Prove to me that he exists. You can't do it. Oh, someone has wooden teeth? How do I know those were actually his? They could be anyone's! All that crap in the history books is myth!

Exercise 2: Did Robin Hood exist? Let's say you meet a history professor who has done his life's work on him, and believes that he did, but thinks most of our stories are legends. However, he still believes we can learn things from this character. Why would you spend hours on an internet forum trying to prove to him that he needs to give up his beliefs and admit that Robin Hood never existed? Especially since he's put so much work into it, and you haven't?
Ex1: Proof belongs to math and math alone. So I can not give you proof.
However, I can give you logic as prove: You wrote the words "George Washington" therefore, by your own admission you just proved "George Washington" exists as an abstract concept.
That that does not how science works however. We need evidence too if you really want to know if George Washington existed as a concrete object.

The irony is that if you argue that you can not prove Washington existed, then you are arguing that Jesus never existed!!!

See this for your logical fallacy:
http://dmitrybrant.com/2006/09/29/on-th ... washington

See this for evidence of Washington's existence (the sources at the bottom that refers to the content in the page):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington

Your dogma prevents your filters from filtering the rubbish from reality. Try another one.

Ex2: We know Robin existed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Hood
(see sources again at the bottom).

Your Jesus did not teach good things. Your dogma is evil since it promotes you to think I am evil for not buying into it. Your dogma claims to know the truth, but no-one is willing to share this. All I get is irrational and illogical dogma drivel. The bible god is obviously false as no such character will promote for me to give up my critical faculties to be saved from an incompetent deity.

Your dogma is hurting people, religion poisons everything. I am promoting rational thought, for your dogma to get new working reason filters. Why are you against this?
Oh my gosh, you're so anti Christianity (really, anti-spirituality, anti-meaning-for-life-beyond-concrete-facts, etc.), I don't even know why I'm bothering. Jesus taught to love enemies. That's evil, huh?
"The tree is known by its fruits. If you want to understand the social and political history of modern man, study hell."
- Thomas Merton, "New Seeds of Contemplation"

My blog

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #472

Post by JohnA »

pokeegeorge wrote: [Replying to post 465 by JohnA]
Not only that, god also said that they would be like gods (know evil and good) when they eat from the tree as per Genesis 3:22. So, your god is not the only god, there are more. More lies from your god!
YHWH Elohim did not say there were no other elohims...He said HE is the only True Elohim for his own promised people; there is some evidence Baal was worshiped by the ancestors of Abraham...other elohims, and other gods.

The problem we have now is that we are three translations of GOD from the original concept of ELOHIM which included supernatural beings not of this world.

English to koine to Aramaic/Hebrew. God in our language to Theos to Elohim.

And the concepts do not match up perfectly. Hence the confusion. When WE say God with a capital 'g' we mean the One True God, although trinitarians have perverted this.

When we say 'god' with a little 'g' we as theists generally mean false 'gods.' When an atheist says it, he means another superstition. But neither is technically what 'elohim' always means, although 'false gods' is one category of 'elohim.'

If there are no other gods, why would you bible refer to other gods:
Genesis 3:22, Gen 1:26
Why the first 3 of the 10 commandments then?

You are merely arguing now that your scripture is wrong. This is bad for you as a omnipotent god would not make mistakes like this. It is clear that the Hebrews promoted this tribal fictional jealous god Yahweh from polytheism.

Elohim, plural of Eli (God).

And why not answer my other questions? What does your dogma say about the FACT that your god lied (3 times by counting now)?

pokeegeorge
Sage
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:41 pm

Post #473

Post by pokeegeorge »

[Replying to post 469 by JohnA]
If there are no other gods, why would you bible refer to other gods:
Genesis 3:22, Gen 1:26
Why the first 3 of the 10 commandments then?
You are referring to 6 plural pronouns in 4 verses which could possibly describe YHWH Elohim as plural...when 11,000 personal SINGULAR verbs and pronouns describe Him as singular...and these verses of yours for thousands of years
have been interpreted by Jewish rabbis as being to the heavenly court or angels, which in turn happen to be ELOHIM also categorized...see I told you Gods, gods and theos do not match up to the word, and you still think I am saying there are no other gods or Gods.

I am a henotheist, look it up. Elohim exist in many forms, but YHWH Elohim is the One True God. Said so in Deut 6:4 explicitly. Said in the Bible 11,000 times in the singular grammatical attendant verbs and pronouns. Said in Isa 45 7 times in case you did not understand the first six...NO OTHER stands next to the One True God.
You are merely arguing now that your scripture is wrong. This is bad for you as a omnipotent god would not make mistakes like this. It is clear that the Hebrews promoted this tribal fictional jealous god Yahweh from polytheism.
No mistakes, your mistake in interpretation.
Elohim, plural of Eli (God).
Again, elohim may have meant plural gods at one time. By the time of the Land of Milk and Honey, this God proclaimed to Moses his true name and singularity. YHWH Elohim the one and only God of the Hebrew nation.
And why not answer my other questions? What does your dogma say about the FACT that your god lied (3 times by counting now)?
Those were not what I was addressing. I was addressing your mistaken view of the Judaic God.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #474

Post by JohnA »

fatherlearningtolove wrote:
JohnA wrote:
fatherlearningtolove wrote: [Replying to post 462 by JohnA]

I would like you to try two thought exercises.

Exercise 1: I don't believe in George Washington. Prove to me that he exists. You can't do it. Oh, someone has wooden teeth? How do I know those were actually his? They could be anyone's! All that crap in the history books is myth!

Exercise 2: Did Robin Hood exist? Let's say you meet a history professor who has done his life's work on him, and believes that he did, but thinks most of our stories are legends. However, he still believes we can learn things from this character. Why would you spend hours on an internet forum trying to prove to him that he needs to give up his beliefs and admit that Robin Hood never existed? Especially since he's put so much work into it, and you haven't?
Ex1: Proof belongs to math and math alone. So I can not give you proof.
However, I can give you logic as prove: You wrote the words "George Washington" therefore, by your own admission you just proved "George Washington" exists as an abstract concept.
That that does not how science works however. We need evidence too if you really want to know if George Washington existed as a concrete object.

The irony is that if you argue that you can not prove Washington existed, then you are arguing that Jesus never existed!!!

See this for your logical fallacy:
http://dmitrybrant.com/2006/09/29/on-th ... washington

See this for evidence of Washington's existence (the sources at the bottom that refers to the content in the page):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington

Your dogma prevents your filters from filtering the rubbish from reality. Try another one.

Ex2: We know Robin existed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Hood
(see sources again at the bottom).

Your Jesus did not teach good things. Your dogma is evil since it promotes you to think I am evil for not buying into it. Your dogma claims to know the truth, but no-one is willing to share this. All I get is irrational and illogical dogma drivel. The bible god is obviously false as no such character will promote for me to give up my critical faculties to be saved from an incompetent deity.

Your dogma is hurting people, religion poisons everything. I am promoting rational thought, for your dogma to get new working reason filters. Why are you against this?
Oh my gosh, you're so anti Christianity (really, anti-spirituality, anti-meaning-for-life-beyond-concrete-facts, etc.), I don't even know why I'm bothering. Jesus taught to love enemies. That's evil, huh?

Now you claim to believe to know my beliefs? How is that coherent?


Read my posts and try to answer:
How do I get saved?
From what do I need to get saved?


Your Jesus was a myth. There is no evidence for a divine historical Jesus. This is what your Jesus myth taught:
1) Jesus was an autotheist:
Matthew 5:38 "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect"
Luke 17:21 "The Kingdom of God is within you"
2) He Hates plants: Cursed a fig tree for not having fruit when it was not even the fruit season! Mark 11:12-25
3) He Hates animals: Violently ran 2000 pigs over a cliff to drown in the sea! Mark 5:11-13
4) He has no compassion for criminal law: Treat others (criminals included) as yourself. So have no prisons, let everyone go! Matthew 22:39.
5) Uphold all the evil laws of the old testament: Mat 5:17
6) Made empty promises; lied. John.14:13 And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son.
7) Irrational. Orders humans to be perfect when god created sin: via Matt 19:21
8) Admitted his is not divine (rejected your Trinity dogma and made the Pre-existence of "son of god" pointless). John 14:10 makes clear distinction between Jesus' authority and the 'father's'.

Is that moral? Do you look up to a delusional fictional character like this and still promote your made up dogma even when historical Jesus was against it?

I do not, how can you even begin to justify your dogma as rational thought?
Last edited by JohnA on Fri Sep 27, 2013 10:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #475

Post by JohnA »

pokeegeorge wrote: [Replying to post 469 by JohnA]
If there are no other gods, why would you bible refer to other gods:
Genesis 3:22, Gen 1:26
Why the first 3 of the 10 commandments then?
You are referring to 6 plural pronouns in 4 verses which could possibly describe YHWH Elohim as plural...when 11,000 personal SINGULAR verbs and pronouns describe Him as singular...and these verses of yours for thousands of years
have been interpreted by Jewish rabbis as being to the heavenly court or angels, which in turn happen to be ELOHIM also categorized...see I told you Gods, gods and theos do not match up to the word, and you still think I am saying there are no other gods or Gods.

I am a henotheist, look it up. Elohim exist in many forms, but YHWH Elohim is the One True God. Said so in Deut 6:4 explicitly. Said in the Bible 11,000 times in the singular grammatical attendant verbs and pronouns. Said in Isa 45 7 times in case you did not understand the first six...NO OTHER stands next to the One True God.
You are merely arguing now that your scripture is wrong. This is bad for you as a omnipotent god would not make mistakes like this. It is clear that the Hebrews promoted this tribal fictional jealous god Yahweh from polytheism.
No mistakes, your mistake in interpretation.
Elohim, plural of Eli (God).
Again, elohim may have meant plural gods at one time. By the time of the Land of Milk and Honey, this God proclaimed to Moses his true name and singularity. YHWH Elohim the one and only God of the Hebrew nation.
And why not answer my other questions? What does your dogma say about the FACT that your god lied (3 times by counting now)?
Those were not what I was addressing. I was addressing your mistaken view of the Judaic God.
So, the bible is contradictory. Exactly my point. an omnipotent omniscience god would not let faults like this get through. So what else is wrong in the bible?

How can it be my mistake if you CLEARLY admitted the ambiguity?


have notice now that you agree that the Hebrews promotes this jealous incompetent god into their monotheist (your Moses example). Is this is the Jew god, why do non Jews worship this character? So, this god lied again, he was not only the Jew god?

You clearly think more than one god exist (henotheist), when just shows again that your god failed to make it clear in his book as monotheists also worship this god. How does your dogma account for this and why does it contradict the monotheist dogma?

This god is indeed incompetent. he can not even decide if he alone is god or other gods are in existence as well.

I know you will not answer my other questions as your dogma contradicts rational thought and the monotheist irrational thought.

pokeegeorge
Sage
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:41 pm

Post #476

Post by pokeegeorge »

[Replying to post 472 by JohnA]
So, the bible is contradictory. Exactly my point. an omnipotent omniscience god would not let faults like this get through. So what else is wrong in the bible?

How can it be my mistake if you CLEARLY admitted the ambiguity?
I said your two verses in Genesis was the singular God speaking to his lesser elohim especially probably angels. This is not contradictory OR ambiguous if you know what was meant by ELOHIM as opposed to YHWH ELOHIM.
have notice now that you agree that the Hebrews promotes this jealous incompetent god into their monotheist (your Moses example). Is this is the Jew god, why do non Jews worship this character? So, this god lied again, he was not only the Jew god?
Why do non Jews worship this character? Because he SHEWED Himself to them?
You clearly think more than one god exist (henotheist), when just shows again that your god failed to make it clear in his book as monotheists also worship this god. How does your dogma account for this and why does it contradict the monotheist dogma?


Clear? It's clear to me you still don't understand the clarity of the Bible.
This god is indeed incompetent. he can not even decide if he alone is god or other gods are in existence as well.
Other ELOHIM exist. None stand next to Him. Repeat.
I know you will not answer my other questions as your dogma contradicts rational thought and the monotheist irrational thought.
I was not actually following your debate with another. Maybe in the morning as my motors are slowing perceptibly.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #477

Post by JohnA »

pokeegeorge wrote: [Replying to post 472 by JohnA]
So, the bible is contradictory. Exactly my point. an omnipotent omniscience god would not let faults like this get through. So what else is wrong in the bible?

How can it be my mistake if you CLEARLY admitted the ambiguity?
I said your two verses in Genesis was the singular God speaking to his lesser elohim especially probably angels. This is not contradictory OR ambiguous if you know what was meant by ELOHIM as opposed to YHWH ELOHIM.
have notice now that you agree that the Hebrews promotes this jealous incompetent god into their monotheist (your Moses example). Is this is the Jew god, why do non Jews worship this character? So, this god lied again, he was not only the Jew god?
Why do non Jews worship this character? Because he SHEWED Himself to them?
You clearly think more than one god exist (henotheist), when just shows again that your god failed to make it clear in his book as monotheists also worship this god. How does your dogma account for this and why does it contradict the monotheist dogma?


Clear? It's clear to me you still don't understand the clarity of the Bible.
This god is indeed incompetent. he can not even decide if he alone is god or other gods are in existence as well.
Other ELOHIM exist. None stand next to Him. Repeat.
I know you will not answer my other questions as your dogma contradicts rational thought and the monotheist irrational thought.
I was not actually following your debate with another. Maybe in the morning as my motors are slowing perceptibly.
Your scripture is clearly a contraction, and you just showed it so. Ironically your dogma confirms it.

Thank you for your honesty.

User avatar
help3434
Guru
Posts: 1509
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: United States
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #478

Post by help3434 »

Stan wrote: [Replying to post 429 by help3434]


Omniscience has NOTHING to do with responsibility. That God has had contingencies in place so as to be proactive only shows how perfect He is, and that we definitely have our own free will to choose what we do. That you don't understand what His purpose for creating mankind was, demonstrates just how far away man is from even getting even remotely close to all knowing.
You must have a very different definition of "omniscience" to claim that an omniscient being would have need of contingencies. Or a different definition of "contingencies". Or both. And yes, omniscience, combined with omnipotence, combined with being the creator of everything would make that being responsible for everything.

fatherlearningtolove
Apprentice
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 1:33 pm
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Contact:

Post #479

Post by fatherlearningtolove »

[Replying to post 471 by JohnA]

John, if I even tried to explain to you, you'd just jump straight to "everything you say is wrong and Jesus was evil." It's pointless to continue. I have put quite a bit of study into my beliefs, and I will tell you that what most Christians believe about being "saved" is nonsense. But if I tried to tell you what I believe, you'd insist on lumping me in with those you are angry at. So it's pointless to continue.

How about this - all atheists are evil. I met one who was quite a jerk, therefore they're all evil. Let's go down that route. We can play that game and end up condemning everyone.

If you want to have a discussion with me, you're going to have to stop playing the game of "I have decided I don't like this, therefore anyone remotely associated with it is evil before I've even found out what they think of it."

I'm not like most of the "Christians" on this forum. Most of them would throw me out as a heretic. But you can't even begin to understand me because you insist on lumping me in with them.
"The tree is known by its fruits. If you want to understand the social and political history of modern man, study hell."
- Thomas Merton, "New Seeds of Contemplation"

My blog

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20832
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 362 times
Contact:

Post #480

Post by otseng »

JohnA wrote: Christianity is evil at it roots, preaching to hate non believers. At its core, it is poison.

and yet you close you eyes/ears and let your dogma utter this drivel that they go hand in hand.
Moderator Comment

Please do not make blanket statements and do not make personal comments.

Please review the Rules.


______________

Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.

Post Reply