A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

myth-one.com
Savant
Posts: 7192
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:16 pm
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 88 times
Contact:

Post #621

Post by myth-one.com »

JohnA wrote:I have to make a choice between 3 options: A, B, C.
I decide and pick B.

1) Are you saying that your god did not know if I would pick A, B, or C?
That's correct.
JohnA wrote:If you say Point 1, then it means your god is not all knowing, but I have free will.
My God knows everything there is to know.

===============================================================================
Nickman wrote:This deity would see things as if they already happened, i.e. looking into the past.
So this deity would look into a past which has not yet occurred. :-k

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #622

Post by JohnA »

myth-one.com wrote:
JohnA wrote:I have to make a choice between 3 options: A, B, C.
I decide and pick B.

1) Are you saying that your god did not know if I would pick A, B, or C?
That's correct.
JohnA wrote:If you say Point 1, then it means your god is not all knowing, but I have free will.
My God knows everything there is to know.

===============================================================================
Nickman wrote:This deity would see things as if they already happened, i.e. looking into the past.
So this deity would look into a past which has not yet occurred. :-k
My God knows everything there is to know.
Except that he did not know that I if I will pick A, B, or C.

What else does he not know?

User avatar
Nickman
Site Supporter
Posts: 5443
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Idaho
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #623

Post by Nickman »

myth-one.com wrote:

===============================================================================
Nickman wrote:This deity would see things as if they already happened, i.e. looking into the past.
So this deity would look into a past which has not yet occurred. :-k
If they are omniscient then they know everything whether it be the past, present or future. If you can see into the future, then it becomes the past to you. Especially if you are outside of time.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #624

Post by JohnA »

Nickman wrote:
help3434 wrote: [Replying to post 613 by Nickman]

But the creator of the universe made everything in such a way that everything that everyone did was inevitable. And this omniscient creator knew it ahead of time better than a programmer knows what his program will do.
You can look at it as a program also, but there are several ways to look at it. If you want to focus on creation as a software program, then omniscience is problematic. If you look at it as a deity who created people with free will, whom he lives outside of time because he created time, then this deity can let his creation do as they will, but he can already see the outcome. As if he is looking into the past.
So, this deity put things in motion and knows exactly how it will play out.
That to me sounds like a person tensing a string and letting it go, and predicted exactly how it will vibrate. Therefore the string can not vibrate any other way, only as predicted.

Now substitute:
person with deity
tensing a string and letting it go with creation of humans
vibrate with behave (free will)
prediction with knowledge (foreknowledge)

That to me sounds like this deity created humans, and know exactly how humans will behave. Therefore humans can not behave any other way, only as this deity knows/predicted.

According to that, humans have no free-will.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #625

Post by JohnA »

Nickman wrote:
myth-one.com wrote:

===============================================================================
Nickman wrote:This deity would see things as if they already happened, i.e. looking into the past.
So this deity would look into a past which has not yet occurred. :-k
If they are omniscient then they know everything whether it be the past, present or future. If you can see into the future, then it becomes the past to you. Especially if you are outside of time.
You need time to action anything. You are arguing that this deity does not action anything, did not create anything (since he had no time to do it).

I have now shown that your deity is not the creator, and even if he was the creator, he did not create humans with free will.

User avatar
Nickman
Site Supporter
Posts: 5443
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Idaho
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #626

Post by Nickman »

JohnA wrote:

So, this deity put things in motion and knows exactly how it will play out.
That to me sounds like a person tensing a string and letting it go, and predicted exactly how it will vibrate. Therefore the string can not vibrate any other way, only as predicted.
Predictions do not hender free will. Can you explain how my ability to predict something deters someones free will? Ultimately everyone will make a decision. Once that decision has been made there is no going back. What is done is done. Omniscience is the concept that an entity can know what those decisions will be. This knowledge in no way hinders the decision maker from making their decision. I would like to know how this knowledge of events hinders free will?
Now substitute:
person with deity
tensing a string and letting it go with creation of humans
vibrate with behave (free will)
prediction with knowledge
When you let go of the string, it will do what it is going to do based on physics. Knowing what it will do does not hinder this. The only hinderance in this scenario is physics, which you could use to determine what the string will do.
That to me sounds like this deity created humans, and know exactly how humans will behave. Therefore humans can not behave any other way, only as this deity knows/predicted.

According to that, humans have no free-will.
"Sounds like" is not evidence for anything.

Again, knowing what will happen as if it has already happened (omniscience) doesn't hinder a person's ability to choose. The reason this entity even knows what you will do is because you already made a decision in the mind of the omniscient one. Can you make a different decision? No, because you already made the decision. Every person will ultimately make a decision that cannot be changed. Regardless if I look at it before it happens or after it happens. I will make some choices tonight at work which are inevitable, they will happen, and in a specific way. In the future, I can look back and see the decisions I made and why. If I am able to look back into the past and know everything about the circumstances in my life, did I just negate my own free will? Could I make a different decision now that will affect my choices back then?
So if an entity has the ability to see the past, present, and future all at the same time, this entity is not hindering free will. The entity is only observing via omniscience.

User avatar
Nickman
Site Supporter
Posts: 5443
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Idaho
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #627

Post by Nickman »

JohnA wrote:
Nickman wrote:
myth-one.com wrote:

===============================================================================
Nickman wrote:This deity would see things as if they already happened, i.e. looking into the past.
So this deity would look into a past which has not yet occurred. :-k
If they are omniscient then they know everything whether it be the past, present or future. If you can see into the future, then it becomes the past to you. Especially if you are outside of time.
You need time to action anything. You are arguing that this deity does not action anything, did not create anything (since he had no time to do it).

I have now shown that your deity is not the creator, and even if he was the creator, he did not create humans with free will.
How have you shown that this deity is not a creator? I didn't argue that this omniscient being couldn't create. I actually said the opposite. What I said was "it doesn't matter if they are the creator or not." However, once we apply the constraints of the Biblical God then it becomes problematic. Scott pointed this out as well when he brought up benevolence.

myth-one.com
Savant
Posts: 7192
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 4:16 pm
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 88 times
Contact:

Post #628

Post by myth-one.com »

Nickman wrote:This deity would see things as if they already happened, i.e. looking into the past.
myth-one.com wrote:So this deity would look into a past which has not yet occurred. :-k
Nickman wrote:If they are omniscient then they know everything whether it be the past, present or future.
No, if they are omniscient they know everything -- period.
Nickman wrote:You need time to action anything.
And you think God doesn't?
For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. (Exodus 20:11)

So time exists for God. Yet you think God can go into the nonexistant future time, and look back into a past which is still future for mankind?
Nickman wrote:I have now shown that your deity is not the creator, and even if he was the creator, he did not create humans with free will.
Where have you shown this?

User avatar
Nickman
Site Supporter
Posts: 5443
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:51 am
Location: Idaho
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #629

Post by Nickman »

myth-one.com wrote:
Nickman wrote:This deity would see things as if they already happened, i.e. looking into the past.
myth-one.com wrote:So this deity would look into a past which has not yet occurred. :-k
Nickman wrote:If they are omniscient then they know everything whether it be the past, present or future.
No, if they are omniscient they know everything -- period.
And this is different from what I said, how?
Nickman wrote:You need time to action anything.
And you think God doesn't?
I didn't write this. John A did and you quoted it as if I said this.

For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. (Exodus 20:11)
So time exists for God. Yet you think God can go into the nonexistant future time, and look back into a past which is still future for mankind?
Nickman wrote:I have now shown that your deity is not the creator, and even if he was the creator, he did not create humans with free will.
Where have you shown this?
You are quoting John A, not me.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Post #630

Post by JohnA »

Nickman wrote:
JohnA wrote:
Nickman wrote:
myth-one.com wrote:

===============================================================================
Nickman wrote:This deity would see things as if they already happened, i.e. looking into the past.
So this deity would look into a past which has not yet occurred. :-k
If they are omniscient then they know everything whether it be the past, present or future. If you can see into the future, then it becomes the past to you. Especially if you are outside of time.
You need time to action anything. You are arguing that this deity does not action anything, did not create anything (since he had no time to do it).

I have now shown that your deity is not the creator, and even if he was the creator, he did not create humans with free will.
How have you shown that this deity is not a creator? I didn't argue that this omniscient being couldn't create. I actually said the opposite. What I said was "it doesn't matter if they are the creator or not." However, once we apply the constraints of the Biblical God then it becomes problematic. Scott pointed this out as well when he brought up benevolence.
I have now shown that your deity is not the creator
Where did he find time to create anything when he is where there is not time?
As stated before (and S Hawking has a long video on this if you want to see it), is you have no time then you can not action anything, you need time to go from state A to state B, so a timeless god could not have created the universe since he had to time to create it.
How can this timeless deity know what is happening a universe that has time - how do you explain the timeless to time link? Again, a timeless deity can not be the creator. Not can this timeless deity 'look back' into future, or the past in a universe with time.
The same goes for creation, how can this deity exist inside/outside nothing before it created the universe? Besides this,
and even if he was the creator, he did not create humans with free will.
If the deity knows what I will have for lunch tomorrow, then it means I can not have anything else, I have no-free-will. Foreknowledge of the future inhibits free-will because it hinders it, it fixes (it can not be anything else). The only way around this is if the deity employes omnipotent and decides not to know. But that signals reduced omniscience, which is not full omniscience. And I can not apologize again if you still do not understand this. I can not explain it any better.

Post Reply