A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

shnarkle
Guru
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:56 am

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #701

Post by shnarkle »

[Replying to post 695 by JohnA]

Probably not. There are too many things that are undefined in the question. Good or decent by who's definition or standard? God's standard or society's?

Just what or who are they rejecting when they reject God's son? Personally, I think this question can only be true if these decent people are possessed of all the facts and in their heart of hearts they know that Jesus is the Son of God, the savior of all mankind and still choose to reject him. Most decent unbelievers aren't possessed of those facts in their hearts to begin with so from that standpoint the premise is false.

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #702

Post by JohnA »

shnarkle wrote: [Replying to post 695 by JohnA]

Probably not. There are too many things that are undefined in the question. Good or decent by who's definition or standard? God's standard or society's?

Just what or who are they rejecting when they reject God's son? Personally, I think this question can only be true if these decent people are possessed of all the facts and in their heart of hearts they know that Jesus is the Son of God, the savior of all mankind and still choose to reject him. Most decent unbelievers aren't possessed of those facts in their hearts to begin with so from that standpoint the premise is false.
Christianity and their doctrines are incoherent.
From what do they think we need to get saved from? From their god is what we need to get saved from. That demigod is an egotistical tyrant. Good thing they have no evidence for that celestial zombie -how can something (this cosmic sorcerer) exist inside/outside nothing before it created everything everywhere some 13.7 bill years ago?

shnarkle
Guru
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:56 am

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #703

Post by shnarkle »

[Replying to post 697 by JohnA]

Christianity and their doctrines are incoherent.

shnarkle: Perhaps. Did you just decide to debate all of the incoherent doctrines of Christianity instead of what I posted?
---------------------------
From what do they think we need to get saved from?

shnarkle: Who knows? Again is this discussion now about all of the nuts out there or are you still interested in discussing the topic of this thread?
------------------------------
From their god is what we need to get saved from.

shnarkle: Not from a biblical perspective. It is never to appease the biblical God. It is always to point out that God requires justice.
-----------------------------
That demigod is an egotistical tyrant.

shnarkle: Where are you getting this assertion from?
------------------------
Good thing they have no evidence for that celestial zombie -how can something (this cosmic sorcerer) exist inside/outside nothing before it created everything everywhere some 13.7 bill years ago?

shnarkle: Good question! It's a good thing that most people who believe in God don't believe in a created god in the first place so they would most likely agree with you. How does anything exist prior to anything existing? I can't speak for everyone, but the consensus is that God always existed. That's the God that they're talking about, not some imaginary tyrannical created god. The evidence is that you can't get something from nothing, and we see that we did have a "big bang" whereby everything came from essentially nothing. It suggests a creator, which is much more plausible than asserting that there is no God

User avatar
Danmark
Site Supporter
Posts: 12697
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:58 am
Location: Seattle
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #704

Post by Danmark »

JohnA wrote:
shnarkle wrote: [Replying to post 695 by JohnA]

Probably not. There are too many things that are undefined in the question. Good or decent by who's definition or standard? God's standard or society's?

Just what or who are they rejecting when they reject God's son? Personally, I think this question can only be true if these decent people are possessed of all the facts and in their heart of hearts they know that Jesus is the Son of God, the savior of all mankind and still choose to reject him. Most decent unbelievers aren't possessed of those facts in their hearts to begin with so from that standpoint the premise is false.
Christianity and their doctrines are incoherent.
From what do they think we need to get saved from? From their god is what we need to get saved from. That demigod is an egotistical tyrant. Good thing they have no evidence for that celestial zombie -how can something (this cosmic sorcerer) exist inside/outside nothing before it created everything everywhere some 13.7 bill years ago?
[emphasis applied]
No John. You are wrong again. Christianity is not 'incoherent.' It's arguments may not be satisfying, its theology may be illogical to you, but it is not 'incoherent.' Their basic claims are clear and comprehensible, even if we do not agree with them.

Your argument in support of 'incoherency' is a non sequitur in that you claim their God is a 'tyrant' and 'egotistical.' Arguing that God is evil, is not a refutation of his existence. In a way, your arguments are the opposite of the Christian 'God.'

The former does not exist, but the arguments are coherent. Your arguments do exist, but they are incoherent.:)

JohnA
Banned
Banned
Posts: 752
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 5:11 am

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #705

Post by JohnA »

Danmark wrote:
JohnA wrote:
shnarkle wrote: [Replying to post 695 by JohnA]

Probably not. There are too many things that are undefined in the question. Good or decent by who's definition or standard? God's standard or society's?

Just what or who are they rejecting when they reject God's son? Personally, I think this question can only be true if these decent people are possessed of all the facts and in their heart of hearts they know that Jesus is the Son of God, the savior of all mankind and still choose to reject him. Most decent unbelievers aren't possessed of those facts in their hearts to begin with so from that standpoint the premise is false.
Christianity and their doctrines are incoherent.
From what do they think we need to get saved from? From their god is what we need to get saved from. That demigod is an egotistical tyrant. Good thing they have no evidence for that celestial zombie -how can something (this cosmic sorcerer) exist inside/outside nothing before it created everything everywhere some 13.7 bill years ago?
[emphasis applied]
No John. You are wrong again. Christianity is not 'incoherent.' It's arguments may not be satisfying, its theology may be illogical to you, but it is not 'incoherent.' Their basic claims are clear and comprehensible, even if we do not agree with them.

Your argument in support of 'incoherency' is a non sequitur in that you claim their God is a 'tyrant' and 'egotistical.' Arguing that God is evil, is not a refutation of his existence. In a way, your arguments are the opposite of the Christian 'God.'

The former does not exist, but the arguments are coherent. Your arguments do exist, but they are incoherent.:)
No John.
Actually Danmark, you are wrong again, it's JohnA. I am not sure who this fictitious user you keep on deferring to is. Can you clarify this?

Let me proceed once again and show that you are way off, hopelessly.
Christianity is not 'incoherent.' It's arguments may not be satisfying, its theology may be illogical to you, but it is not 'incoherent.' Their basic claims are clear and comprehensible, even if we do not agree with them.
Is that why you do not understand the faith dogma?
Is that why many theists here do not understand the faith dogma?
You and these theists thinks there is evidence for this god when their faith says there is none and so does science. But you continue and claim this god does not exist, but has evidence and you know what this god is and is not? And you call that being coherent? Really Danmark?


Is this why you have no coherent answer for:
How can something (this cosmic sorcerer - according to the bible) exist inside/outside nothing before it created everything everywhere some 13.7 bill years ago?
How can a supernatural being have evidence in the natural without rendering the being natural?
Your argument in support of 'incoherency' is a non sequitur in that you claim their God is a 'tyrant' and 'egotistical.' Arguing that God is evil, is not a refutation of his existence. In a way, your arguments are the opposite of the Christian 'God.'
Actually, I can say 'tyrant' and 'egotistical.' about the characteristics of the god. That is because I get that from the claims in the bible. Are you now saying that you have some evidence that the claims in the bible is false? You have some evidence of a beings not being beings? And you are saying that is not incoherent?

The former does not exist, but the arguments are coherent
Here you go again. Are you again claiming this Christian god do not exist? Is this the same god that appeared to you saying he is not god?
Your arguments do exist, but they are incoherent
I think you may be referring to yourself here, your arguments. Another example of straw manning yourself, 240 lb-ft not right enough Danmark?

Elijah John
Savant
Posts: 12236
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:23 pm
Location: New England
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #706

Post by Elijah John »

[Replying to post 1 by marketandchurch]

Well, that's what evangelist John says anyway. I doubt Jesus himself ever said that he was the only way to the Father.

That's the problem with taking the Bible as innerrent and literal as a whole. Personally I do not believe that Atheists of good will, Agnostics, Muslims, Jews, Taoists, etc..of good will, are condemned for not believing in John and Pauls vision of Jesus.

I wish Fundamentalist Christians would say their way is the BEST way (for them anyway) but not the only way to God.

Funny, that Fundamentalists think the biggest sin in the world is not believing in theiir interpretation of Jesus. Worse than murder even. Ridiculous.

shnarkle
Guru
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:56 am

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #707

Post by shnarkle »

[Replying to Elijah John]
I doubt Jesus himself ever said that he was the only way to the Father.

shnarkle: He said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life", not "a way", but "the way".
-------------------------

That's the problem with taking the Bible as innerrent and literal as a whole.

shnarkle: If the bible is correct, and without error, then those who think there are errors are the ones with the problem.
---------------------------
I wish Fundamentalist Christians would say their way is the BEST way (for them anyway) but not the only way to God.

Funny, that Fundamentalists think the biggest sin in the world is not believing in theiir interpretation of Jesus. Worse than murder even. Ridiculous.

shnarkle: Perhaps, but then the bible says nothing about believing in someone's private interpretation other than there is no room for it in scripture. The only people going to heaven are those that God calls.

User avatar
help3434
Guru
Posts: 1509
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: United States
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #708

Post by help3434 »

[Replying to shnarkle]

So God only calls some people to heaven? I guess the bible was lying about God being no respecter of persons then.

Elijah John
Savant
Posts: 12236
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 8:23 pm
Location: New England
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 16 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #709

Post by Elijah John »

shnarkle wrote: [Replying to Elijah John]
I doubt Jesus himself ever said that he was the only way to the Father.

shnarkle: He said, "I am the way, the truth, and the life", not "a way", but "the way".
-------------------------

That's the problem with taking the Bible as innerrent and literal as a whole.

shnarkle: If the bible is correct, and without error, then those who think there are errors are the ones with the problem.
---------------------------
I wish Fundamentalist Christians would say their way is the BEST way (for them anyway) but not the only way to God.

Funny, that Fundamentalists think the biggest sin in the world is not believing in theiir interpretation of Jesus. Worse than murder even. Ridiculous.

shnarkle: Perhaps, but then the bible says nothing about believing in someone's private interpretation other than there is no room for it in scripture. The only people going to heaven are those that God calls.

So how do you know that Jesus actually said the things that are attributed to him in the Gospels? He did not write them himself.

Also, how about the verses attributed to Jesus saying that his second coming would be in the lifetime of his apostles? That did not happen. They all died and Jesus still has not returned. Does that make Jesus a false prophet of does it make the Gospel writers fallible?

And where in the Old testament does it say that the messiah would come twice, because he would not fulfill the messianic prophecies the first time around?

shnarkle
Guru
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:56 am

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #710

Post by shnarkle »

[Replying to post 703 by help3434]
So God only calls some people to heaven? I guess the bible was lying about God being no respecter of persons then.

shnarkle: No. God is not a respecter of persons, and there is nothing anyone can do to warrant God's mercy. It is only by his mercy that anyone is saved. It is only by his sovereign will that anyone is saved. Whoever God calls is (according to Paul) justified, and glorified. The thing you need to keep in mind is that God calls some to be vessels of wrath, and there is nothing anyone can do to thwart God's sovereign will. When God makes a promise, and He makes quite a few; He keeps it.

Post Reply