[
Replying to DanieltheDragon]
There is no natural law of morality that is just an arbitrary set of ideals you foist upon your perspective of reality.
Disagree. It is how/why all men can know right from wrong/good from bad. It is based on science, observation of the world we live in and man’s relationship with this world, reason, and logic. A thing’s shape/form says something about its function/purpose. We use this scientific approach to know what makes sense/what is in our best interest/what is ordered.
As has been demonstrated throughout the animal kingdom many animals exhibit homosexual behaviors and in many circumstances such as in elephants it is socially beneficial.
First, man is not the same as animals so the same “rules� don’t apply. Some animals eat their young – clearly, it is wrong for man to eat his young. Second, many studies attempting to demonstrate homosexuality in nature are quite liberal in their distinction and categorize the rubbing of feathers against each other for some birds a “homosexual� act. The truth is there is no gay gene AND even if there is found some kind of
natural or
born that way evidence regarding same sex attraction, does this imply right/good? Are pedophiles born that way? Can a pedophile help his attraction to children?
Again as has been mentioned why don't you follow the moral laws of hinduism?
Again, what are the moral laws of Hinduism? What are the moral laws of Christianity? What are the moral laws of atheists? What are the moral laws of Italians? Germans? Democrats? Lawyers?
Why should I consider Hindu religious laws or Abrahamic religious laws?
You shouldn’t, unless your Hindu or Abrahamic? Religious laws are not necessarily moral laws.
If God doesn't exist I am not subject to god's law.
We are all subject to the laws of the world we live in. Whether you give God credit for the world or not is of little consequence.
There is an old expression . . .
God always forgives.
Man sometimes forgives.
Nature never forgives.
Considering that God is just a figment of human imagination, you would be completely wrong to suggest anyone is under God's law.
I didn’t mention God, you did.