Haven wrote:
Welcome! I used to be a Marxist, but have evolved into a centrist who reluctantly supports capitalism.
May I ask what you think of China's progress toward socialism? It seems like it's moved completely in a capitalist direction.
Interesting question. I think I might fit in rather well here after all. : )
I guess in short I'd say that China - like any state dealing with material reality - has a lot of contradictions (both in the Marxist and vernacular sense of the word). Any Chinese person - Party Member or otherwise - would tell you as much I'm sure.
Funnily enough, just over a week ago, I traveled to Guang'an - Deng Xiaoping's hometown. I used to outright despise him as a revisionist who destroyed the revolutionary spirit of China, and I never really understood why any Chinese person could possibly admire him except for wanting to run a business and grow wealthy at the expense of others.
Recently, though, after a bit of self-criticism, I see I'd been taking accounts of him, generally by individuals hostile to (or at least operating outside of the praxis of) socialism more or less at face value instead of reading the man's own words. So recently I've read a fair amount of works, and he seems to actually, for the most part be consistent with the main ideas of Maoism. For most of his life, he was in the same faction of the Party as Mao, and defended Mao against the ultra-leftist faction.
Did he criticize some of Mao's theory and practice? Of course. But I see that as part of the Marxist-Leninist praxis, that incidentally, Mao himself was big on. No one should be "above" criticism (or self-criticism). And to be frank, even though I align myself mostly in Mao's field, I think as a human being, he made some mistakes. Some fairly big ones at that. Deng did too. As do all of us humans.
I guess my point is the narrative that there was some sort of huge
ideological shift in China post-Mao is probably without particularly much historical backing. Deng Xiaoping himself didn't seem to think he was making much of a departure from Maoism. (Interestingly, Xi Jinping was a former Red Youth, and I think is doing a lot of work to get rid of some of the endemic corruption here).
But of course, different historical conditions require different actions on the part of states. Lenin himself advised that we ought to "use capitalism against itself". So while it certainly has its dangers, it isn't necessarily a betrayal of socialism to allow the opening of a market economy or foreign investment therein if ultimately the state still retains controlling interest. It's easier to serve the people's interests with a strong economy than one sanctioned into the abyss. Sad, but in a Post-Soviet world especially, probably necessary for the time being. Socialism is a goal.
Since the Chinese Communist Party still maintains political control, and is still operating ideologically more or less under Marxist-Leninist praxis (or at the very least, the Party Members I've talked to seem to know their stuff), I'd still consider the PRC to be a socialist
state. Economically perhaps not, but that's the goal it's working towards. More or less that's what the CCP's campaign of the "Chinese Dream" is openly saying these days - the economy has become strong enough that everyone should be able to attain at least a decent standard of living and we're going to continue to work to make things better for the people from there.
Sure, there are a lot of corporations - both domestic and foreign in China - but I'd say, unlike, say, the US, the government still has a lot of controlling leverage. The government was able to make factories close down for several weeks before the Victory Day Parade to ensure low pollution for Beijing. All factories of above a certain size are required to have a local branch of the CCP, if the leadership is not already CCP. Instead of capitalists controlling the state - as is the case in capitalist states - the state controls the capitalists.
It's possible things could swing the other way in the future, but for now I'd consider it relatively socialist politically. Economically it's more ... pragmatic I suppose, but likely a better choice in that sense than being sanctioned into oblivion as happened to the DPRK/Cuba/even Russia these days. China's playing the long game, I think, of becoming economically powerful enough to have some sway on the world market/economy, and it's really starting to pay off.
Where I
would fault the CCP most harshly is that they've somewhat lapsed in creating a socialist superstructure. I've traveled to Vietnam and the DPRK as well, and when you walk down the streets in say Ho Chi Minh City or Pyongyang, you see communist banners, murals with slogans like "Serve the people wholeheartedly", "work together for a better future", etc.
I've traveled to over a dozen cities in China, and with the exception of historical sites, you don't see that anywhere here. Just advertisements (which I would argue are propaganda of a sense for consumerist/capitalist ideology). I think that, more than anything, is destroying the ethos of communism in the minds of young people here. A lot of them seem to idolize the west and the idea of getting rich more than making themselves or their country as a whole fundamentally better. To me, I have to question what is the role of the Communist Party as a Vanguard if not to instill proper consciousness in the people.
But I'm probably going on way too long-winded on this (2:00 AM here in China, and I tend to ramble about these things. >_< ). Out of curiosity, might I ask what tendency of Marxist you were?
Though if we're derailing this thread too much, I'm happy to go elsewhere.