Here is the key phrase:
but nobody has ever detected signs of such huge amounts of antimatter.
Look like more faith to me if there is no evidence that it exists and yet point to the fact that it might exist.
The link is not working. I have however found
another link that work.
Anyways, how is it relevent to the argument that we can make a matter/anti-matter pair? Even to make it, humans had to have been involved. And they had to construct a device to create the matter/anti-matter pair. It did not just spontaneously come out of nowhere. An elaborate system had to be first constructed to generate anti-matter. This is further evidence of a supernatural world since some system outside of ours must exist to have created the matter in our universe.
Why does the universe apparently contain only matter, and no antimatter?
Interesting theory. But there is no evidence to back this up.
Lotan wrote:
Unfortunately, the Big Bang (that's probably not what you're referring to is it?) would qualify as one of those events that some think must be a result of supernatural forces.
Yes, I'm referring to the Big Bang.
The fact is that we don't know if the FLoT was violated.
If we don't know that, then how can we know anything? That is, are you saying the laws of physics were somehow different during the Big Bang? This seems to me like a reverse logic of what Nyril used above. Instead of saying laws might be different in the future, it was different in the past. Again, we can only base our understanding on the things we currently know. Until our understanding of physics changes, we cannot go by possible past or future possibilities.
Maybe everything has always been here and continually expands and contracts.
Impossible. This would violate the second law of thermo.
The best hypothesis that I've heard comes from string theory.
And even the
Superstring theory points to the supernatural. It posits 10, 11, or 26 dimensions for the theory to hold. Since we have only 3.5 dimensions in our universe. All the other dimensions would not be part of our universe.
It could very well involve natural phenomena that we are not aware of yet.
It certainly could. But this viewpoint is based on pure speculation instead of any substantive logic. So, until anyone can actually use facts to disprove my argument instead of appealing to faith, my argument for the existence of the supernatural stands unrefuted.
Thank you for playing though, and please accept this consolation prize...
Uh, the
billion dollar baby?
