"Eyewitnesses" that are not eyewitnesses?

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Zzyzx
Site Supporter
Posts: 25140
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
Location: Bible Belt USA
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 93 times

"Eyewitnesses" that are not eyewitnesses?

Post #1

Post by Zzyzx »

.
In many, many threads someone has been claiming there were "seven written eyewitness accounts." Now it seems to have been augmented with a claim that eyewitnesses were quoted in gospels.
Korah wrote: You're quite aware that I've been claiming around here that there are seven WRITTEN eyewitness accounts about Jesus included variously among the four gospels (might be some others in the Gospel of Thomas, Peter, Mary, that's not my "bag" (anybody these days still understand "Hippie" language--I'm really dating myself here).) That's not counting eyewitnesses that get quoted by others in the gospels, like the slightly varying versions of the three women at the Tomb (Mary Magdalene in John 20, the "other Mary" in Matthew and Mark, and Joanna in Luke 24). When ya gonna deal with all THAT, Z-man?
Aside from all the personal drivel, does the claim have merit?
.
Non-Theist

ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence

User avatar
Regens Küchl
Scholar
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 7:09 am

Re: "Eyewitnesses" that are not eyewitnesses?

Post #11

Post by Regens Küchl »

[Replying to Zzyzx]

Yes! Absolutely yes! I can guarantee, in fact I can even logically prove it - That all four gospelwriters were eyewitnesses to the writing of their gospels! Isnt that sensational?

Post Reply