I'm sick of people repeating this ridiculous statment. I've pointed out many times that using arguments in place of evidence is not inappropriate. An argument uses evidence within its premises, so it's completely absurd to say that arguments are not evidence. I've pointed this out to Goat and, of course, he ignores me and continues to repeat this nonsense despite the fact that it's been refuted by multiple people on this forum. This is also a debate forum, and arguments are used in debate.Goat wrote:Of course, one thing that it seems many people can not understand, arguments are not evidence.
Questions:
1) Is there any distinction between arguments and evidence? Is one superior to the other?
2) Is it appropriate to use arguments when debating issues about Christianity and Apologetics?