Did Christianity destroy Greek and Roman civilization?

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Imaginos
Student
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 12:48 am
Location: UK

Did Christianity destroy Greek and Roman civilization?

Post #1

Post by Imaginos »

Did Christianity destroy Greek and Roman civilization and create the Dark Ages?

http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/dark-age.htm

I personally think it did.
In the Roman Empire prior Christianity there was a general freedom of religion and ideas.

That all changed after the Roman Empire became Christian, as Christians resolved to force Christianity on everyone.

Civilization or at least Europe went backwards as the intolerance of Christianity destroyed the architecure, the literature and much of the knowledge of Ancient Rome and Greece.

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Post #21

Post by East of Eden »

Imaginos wrote:
Tex wrote:
Its hardly surprising that early Christians were hated with good reason.
They were completely intolerant to other beliefs and wanted to destroy values deeply held by the classical world like freedom of religious faith, freedom of speech and freedom of knowledge.
Tex: Are you serious?? Wake up and smell the coffee. If people were so happy with the Roman rule....They would have killed the Apostles before they could have said "boo".

"freedom of speech" in Roman times.....Now you have to tell me where you heard that one? :)
Science and Technology prospered in the Roman Empire as the Pagan religions had no agenda of restricting knowledge or forcing people to follow a specific faith.
That's funny, belief in Christianity didn't restrict these guys:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ch ... in_science

Alfred North Whitehead and Robert Oppenheimer both said Christianity was the reason science arose in the West, and not elsewhere.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

Imaginos
Student
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 12:48 am
Location: UK

Post #22

Post by Imaginos »

East of Eden wrote:
If I were a member of the bronze-age theocracy of Israel you might have a point. Jesus harmed nobody, and when confronted with disbelievers merely sadly walked away. He specifically warned against such purges in the parable of the wheat and the tares. You don't judge a philosophy by it's misuse.
Christianity was used in a very destructive way by many people though, and that is part of its influence on the world.
Hence we ended up with things like the Inquisition and the Crusades.
And those things are supported by verses in the Bible, so Christianity is at least part of the cause of them.
Last edited by Imaginos on Sun Jun 10, 2012 8:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Imaginos
Student
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 12:48 am
Location: UK

Post #23

Post by Imaginos »

East of Eden wrote:
That's funny, belief in Christianity didn't restrict these guys:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ch ... in_science

Alfred North Whitehead and Robert Oppenheimer both said Christianity was the reason science arose in the West, and not elsewhere.
Your comment is pretty ironic considering at a glance that list includes Giordano Bruno and Michael Servetus who were both burnt at the stake, as well as Galileo who was also imprisoned by the church.

If I went through the list I'd probably find others who were persecuted.
Anyone who thinks Christianity helped scientific progress is just deluding themselves.

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Post #24

Post by East of Eden »

Imaginos wrote:
East of Eden wrote:
That's funny, belief in Christianity didn't restrict these guys:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Ch ... in_science

Alfred North Whitehead and Robert Oppenheimer both said Christianity was the reason science arose in the West, and not elsewhere.
Your comment is pretty ironic considering at a glance that list includes Giordano Bruno and Michael Servetus who were both burnt at the stake, as well as Galileo who was also imprisoned by the church.
As Whitehead said, Galileo died peacefully on his bed with a mild reprimand, you can argue the other two were killed for theological, not scientific reasons.
If I went through the list I'd probably find others who were persecuted.
Anyone who thinks Christianity helped scientific progress is just deluding themselves.
Like Oppenheimer and Whitehead? Maybe you think it was a coincidence science arose on the Christian West?
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Post #25

Post by East of Eden »

Imaginos wrote:
East of Eden wrote:
If I were a member of the bronze-age theocracy of Israel you might have a point. Jesus harmed nobody, and when confronted with disbelievers merely sadly walked away. He specifically warned against such purges in the parable of the wheat and the tares. You don't judge a philosophy by it's misuse.
Christianity was used in a very destructive way by many people though, and that is part of its influence on the world.
Hence we ended up with things like the Inquisition and the Crusades.
And those things are supported by verses in the Bible, so Christianity is at least part of the cause of them.
Where did Jesus say to do those things? Do Stalin's actions invalidate atheism?
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

Rkrause
Guru
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 4:40 pm

Post #26

Post by Rkrause »

Imaginos wrote:
East of Eden wrote:
If I were a member of the bronze-age theocracy of Israel you might have a point. Jesus harmed nobody, and when confronted with disbelievers merely sadly walked away. He specifically warned against such purges in the parable of the wheat and the tares. You don't judge a philosophy by it's misuse.
Christianity was used in a very destructive way by many people though, and that is part of its influence on the world.
Hence we ended up with things like the Inquisition and the Crusades.
And those things are supported by verses in the Bible, so Christianity is at least part of the cause of them.
Unit 731 all in the name of an emperor. Pel Pot, Stalin, Hitler all used idealogical ideas to support theirr actions.

The dark ages were created by governments not religion. In fact the very few people could read and write unless they were attached to the christian church. Monks were the best educated and copied the books we still have today.

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Post #27

Post by Goat »

Rkrause wrote:
Imaginos wrote:
East of Eden wrote:
If I were a member of the bronze-age theocracy of Israel you might have a point. Jesus harmed nobody, and when confronted with disbelievers merely sadly walked away. He specifically warned against such purges in the parable of the wheat and the tares. You don't judge a philosophy by it's misuse.
Christianity was used in a very destructive way by many people though, and that is part of its influence on the world.
Hence we ended up with things like the Inquisition and the Crusades.
And those things are supported by verses in the Bible, so Christianity is at least part of the cause of them.
Unit 731 all in the name of an emperor. Pel Pot, Stalin, Hitler all used idealogical ideas to support theirr actions.

The dark ages were created by governments not religion. In fact the very few people could read and write unless they were attached to the christian church. Monks were the best educated and copied the books we still have today.
Stalin used the ideology of The State, Pol Pot used the ideology of Theravada Buddhism and Hitler thought he was dong the work of Jesus. Of course, they all were quite insane. The hard thing about it is that they got other people to go along with them.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

Rkrause
Guru
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 4:40 pm

Post #28

Post by Rkrause »

Goat wrote:
Rkrause wrote:
Imaginos wrote:
East of Eden wrote:
If I were a member of the bronze-age theocracy of Israel you might have a point. Jesus harmed nobody, and when confronted with disbelievers merely sadly walked away. He specifically warned against such purges in the parable of the wheat and the tares. You don't judge a philosophy by it's misuse.
Christianity was used in a very destructive way by many people though, and that is part of its influence on the world.
Hence we ended up with things like the Inquisition and the Crusades.
And those things are supported by verses in the Bible, so Christianity is at least part of the cause of them.
Unit 731 all in the name of an emperor. Pel Pot, Stalin, Hitler all used idealogical ideas to support theirr actions.

The dark ages were created by governments not religion. In fact the very few people could read and write unless they were attached to the christian church. Monks were the best educated and copied the books we still have today.
Stalin used the ideology of The State, Pol Pot used the ideology of Theravada Buddhism and Hitler thought he was dong the work of Jesus. Of course, they all were quite insane. The hard thing about it is that they got other people to go along with them.
Thats a whole new topic....Why do people follow insane people?

User avatar
East of Eden
Under Suspension
Posts: 7032
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Post #29

Post by East of Eden »

Goat wrote:
Rkrause wrote:
Imaginos wrote:
East of Eden wrote:
If I were a member of the bronze-age theocracy of Israel you might have a point. Jesus harmed nobody, and when confronted with disbelievers merely sadly walked away. He specifically warned against such purges in the parable of the wheat and the tares. You don't judge a philosophy by it's misuse.
Christianity was used in a very destructive way by many people though, and that is part of its influence on the world.
Hence we ended up with things like the Inquisition and the Crusades.
And those things are supported by verses in the Bible, so Christianity is at least part of the cause of them.
Unit 731 all in the name of an emperor. Pel Pot, Stalin, Hitler all used idealogical ideas to support theirr actions.

The dark ages were created by governments not religion. In fact the very few people could read and write unless they were attached to the christian church. Monks were the best educated and copied the books we still have today.
Stalin used the ideology of The State, Pol Pot used the ideology of Theravada Buddhism
So those two weren't really atheists?
and Hitler thought he was dong the work of Jesus.
He said that early on, while duping his way to power. His end game was to go after Christians too.

Funny, if Hitler was doing Jesus' work, why didn't the martyred Dietrich Bonhoffer figure out they were on the same side? :confused2:
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Post #30

Post by Goat »

Rkrause wrote:

Thats a whole new topic....Why do people follow insane people?

Good question.. Hitler was the 'voice of authority'.. and people were scared. If people talked against the government, they just 'disappeared' .. I think Stalin was a similar situation.. I don't know enough about Pol Pot. .. but I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

Post Reply