For the past few years I have been seeing nonbelievers equate Jesus to any fiction of their choice. They say "Jesus is like Spider-man", "James Bond is just as real as Jesus", "We have the same about of evidence for King Arthur as we do for Jesus", etc... The list goes on and on.
So I want to give you guys a chance to prove this, if you believe these things.. I am willing to actually take these claims, and see if they can be justified, by comparing the evidence of any fiction of myth, to that of Jesus.. The historical evidence...
I am convinced that there is more historical evidence for Jesus then there is for ANY known fictional and/or mythological person. But i am willing for anyone to prove me wrong, and justify these comparisons.
For the purpose of discussion:
What fictional or mythological person is comparable to Jesus (bring your evidence)? Is there any fictional people who have the magnitude of historical evidence that Jesus does?
(and id allow anyone to question the validity of the evidence as well)
Does anyone really think Jesus should be equated to any fictional/mythological person?
If not, maybe we should stop making these claims...
Equating Jesus to fiction is irrational
Moderator: Moderators
- rikuoamero
- Under Probation
- Posts: 6707
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2015 2:06 pm
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Equating Jesus to fiction is irrational
Post #21Unlike Jesus, you asked and ye shall most definitely receive...Tart wrote:Ok, so this doesnt even need to go very far...rikuoamero wrote: [Replying to post 1 by Tart]
Are you sure you want to do this?I am convinced that there is more historical evidence for Jesus then there is for ANY known fictional and/or mythological person.
Okay then. Challenge accepted. Give us your historical evidence for Jesus, and I will use your very standards of evidence to prove that Spiderman exists. Oh I know for a fact that Spiderman is fictional, you know for a fact that Spiderman is fictional...but the point is, that the very historical evidence(s) you claim you can use for Jesus, I will use for Spiderman and in order to be logicall consistent, you will have to agree that Spiderman is then real.
Go on. Hit me with your best shot. I am fully confident that I can do what I said up above.
Is there anyone at all historical in the spider man comics?
https://www.ranker.com/list/real-people ... ker-comics
Stan Lee has featured in Spiderman comics. As has Stephen Colbert. And Obama. And Jay Leno.
Notice that, when compared to the Bible, to Jesus, there is no question at all about these people existing. They are also far much closer in time to us, in fact they are all still alive. It's always been a historical methodology mainstay that the closer in time the event in question is to both the evidence being used to support and the person learning about it, the better. So a person in 2002 writing about 9/11 is considered (generally speaking) to be a better source than someone writing about 9/11 in 2018.

Your life is your own. Rise up and live it - Richard Rahl, Sword of Truth Book 6 "Faith of the Fallen"
I condemn all gods who dare demand my fealty, who won't look me in the face so's I know who it is I gotta fealty to. -- JoeyKnotHead
Some force seems to restrict me from buying into the apparent nonsense that others find so easy to buy into. Having no religious or supernatural beliefs of my own, I just call that force reason. -- Tired of the Nonsense
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6050
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6925 times
- Been thanked: 3244 times
Re: Equating Jesus to fiction is irrational
Post #22[Replying to post 19 by Tart]
Give us your historical evidence for Jesus, and I will use your very standards of evidence to prove that Spiderman exists.
So, you are simply going to dodge the challenge. Not surprising really. You have consistently avoided providing historical evidence for Jesus. You have to wonder why.Is there anyone at all historical in the spider man comics?
Re: Equating Jesus to fiction is irrational
Post #23Ok so the historical evidence for spider-man is 4 people have been featured in the comics... And do you have any more historical evidence? Or is that it? For example, do real people confess to knowing spider man? Does he have any real living family? Do any historians claim or suggest spider man existed? Does any real people, who are in the comic, claim to have known spider man personally, being in his presence?rikuoamero wrote:Unlike Jesus, you asked and ye shall most definitely receive...Tart wrote:Ok, so this doesnt even need to go very far...rikuoamero wrote: [Replying to post 1 by Tart]
Are you sure you want to do this?I am convinced that there is more historical evidence for Jesus then there is for ANY known fictional and/or mythological person.
Okay then. Challenge accepted. Give us your historical evidence for Jesus, and I will use your very standards of evidence to prove that Spiderman exists. Oh I know for a fact that Spiderman is fictional, you know for a fact that Spiderman is fictional...but the point is, that the very historical evidence(s) you claim you can use for Jesus, I will use for Spiderman and in order to be logicall consistent, you will have to agree that Spiderman is then real.
Go on. Hit me with your best shot. I am fully confident that I can do what I said up above.
Is there anyone at all historical in the spider man comics?
https://www.ranker.com/list/real-people ... ker-comics
Stan Lee has featured in Spiderman comics. As has Stephen Colbert. And Obama. And Jay Leno.
Notice that, when compared to the Bible, to Jesus, there is no question at all about these people existing. They are also far much closer in time to us, in fact they are all still alive. It's always been a historical methodology mainstay that the closer in time the event in question is to both the evidence being used to support and the person learning about it, the better. So a person in 2002 writing about 9/11 is considered (generally speaking) to be a better source than someone writing about 9/11 in 2018.
What does Stan Lee, Stephen Colbert. And Obama. And Jay Leno. Say about spider-man?
Did an entire population of people believe Spider-man existed?
Last edited by Tart on Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:35 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Re: Equating Jesus to fiction is irrational
Post #24Ok here is one post i mentioned the historical evidence (post 13)brunumb wrote: [Replying to post 19 by Tart]
Give us your historical evidence for Jesus, and I will use your very standards of evidence to prove that Spiderman exists.So, you are simply going to dodge the challenge. Not surprising really. You have consistently avoided providing historical evidence for Jesus. You have to wonder why.Is there anyone at all historical in the spider man comics?
viewtopic.php?t=34637&start=10
Re: Equating Jesus to fiction is irrational
Post #25Whats the evidence for Prester John?wiploc wrote: [Replying to post 1 by Tart]
How about Prester John?
I'm not willing to educate myself enough to argue the case. I'm just throwing Prester John's hat in the ring as a possible subject of discussion. If you're looking for a fictional person who might have better evidence than Jesus, Prester John might be one such.
- William
- Savant
- Posts: 16490
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
- Location: Te Waipounamu
- Has thanked: 1037 times
- Been thanked: 1950 times
- Contact:
Re: Equating Jesus to fiction is irrational
Post #26[Replying to post 23 by Tart]
Indeed, that is the whole crux of the matter which you fail to want to consider. The failure amounts to turning a blind eye. Your direction of approach is cart before the horse, through the assumption (or being likewise educated) that the fiction is fact at the go-get. That simply cannot be established, and will remain that way, even if the horse is correctly placed.
Faith is simply not a great device in which to use to argue fact with.

It is not so much confession as it is profession. Obviously in both cases the stories are written by real people. It has already been shown why those in control of biblical production and distribution would want to present the fiction as factual.For example, does real people confess to knowing spider man?
Indeed, that is the whole crux of the matter which you fail to want to consider. The failure amounts to turning a blind eye. Your direction of approach is cart before the horse, through the assumption (or being likewise educated) that the fiction is fact at the go-get. That simply cannot be established, and will remain that way, even if the horse is correctly placed.
Faith is simply not a great device in which to use to argue fact with.

- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6050
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6925 times
- Been thanked: 3244 times
Re: Equating Jesus to fiction is irrational
Post #27[Replying to post 24 by Tart]
From that post:Ok here is one post i mentioned the historical evidence (post 13)
viewtopic.php?t=34637&start=10
The extra-biblical sources are the evidence for an historical Jesus. The Bible is the fiction you are using to establish that one of its characters is not fictional. Try again with those many extra-biblical sources.For now, I will leave out the extra-biblical sources, while there are many of them and as i said before, I havent found a single source from antiquity supporting Jesus as myth or fictional, and in fact scholars agree there is no sources from antiquity that suggest Jesus didnt exist...
Re: Equating Jesus to fiction is irrational
Post #28Ok, if the Bible is fiction, do you have any problems with the evidence i mentioned? Surely you have something to contest then, right?brunumb wrote: [Replying to post 24 by Tart]
From that post:Ok here is one post i mentioned the historical evidence (post 13)
viewtopic.php?t=34637&start=10The extra-biblical sources are the evidence for an historical Jesus. The Bible is the fiction you are using to establish that one of its characters is not fictional. Try again with those many extra-biblical sources.For now, I will leave out the extra-biblical sources, while there are many of them and as i said before, I havent found a single source from antiquity supporting Jesus as myth or fictional, and in fact scholars agree there is no sources from antiquity that suggest Jesus didnt exist...
Re: Equating Jesus to fiction is irrational
Post #29If you have any problems with the evidence i present, feel free to say so, and give your reasoning why...William wrote: [Replying to post 23 by Tart]
It is not so much confession as it is profession. Obviously in both cases the stories are written by real people. It has already been shown why those in control of biblical production and distribution would want to present the fiction as factual.For example, does real people confess to knowing spider man?
Indeed, that is the whole crux of the matter which you fail to want to consider. The failure amounts to turning a blind eye. Your direction of approach is cart before the horse, through the assumption (or being likewise educated) that the fiction is fact at the go-get. That simply cannot be established, and will remain that way, even if the horse is correctly placed.
Faith is simply not a great device in which to use to argue fact with.
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6050
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6925 times
- Been thanked: 3244 times
Re: Equating Jesus to fiction is irrational
Post #30[Replying to post 28 by Tart]
Please quit with the diversionary tactics and provide the extra-biblical evidence.Ok, if the Bible is fiction, do you have any problems with the evidence i mentioned?



