Were the Nazis justified in the genocide of the Jews?

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

no evidence no belief
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1507
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:18 pm

Were the Nazis justified in the genocide of the Jews?

Post #1

Post by no evidence no belief »

Were the Nazis justified in the genocide of the Jews?

According to TheTruth101, apparently they were.

He writes:
Hitler was a Christian and mass murdered the Jews. It's a pay back, or, eye for an eye, for what the Jews did to Christ.

Problem lies when masses think of Christ as benevolent, when he carries characters of omnipotence as well. Therefore, they must be of flowers to be his follower.

Simply not true. To a fella bretheren, its proper conduct to be genuine and respectable, but, to an opposition, no mercy.

This ofcourse goes with scriptures as well and can be given if one requests.

Question for debate: Based on my various statements on this board, and based on the statements of TheTruth101, who do you think it would be easier for a ruthless and charismatic dictator to brainwash into committing genocide, me or him?

Justin108
Banned
Banned
Posts: 4471
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 5:28 am

Post #31

Post by Justin108 »

GADARENE wrote: I killed him. everyone of us had a part in that darkest deed.

"he bled and died to take my sins away. how great thou art. how great thou art."
Blaming us for the crucifixion is like blaming an emo's ex for him cutting himself. Jesus did that to himself. He could have just made our sins go away (omnipotence) but he chose to be emo about it

User avatar
Goat
Site Supporter
Posts: 24999
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 207 times

Re: Were the Nazis justified in the genocide of the Jews?

Post #32

Post by Goat »

alive wrote:

Look they in away had it coming...Maybe a little harsher and cruler than it should of been but research the history..

really??? what history is that? Let me guess.It's all documented in the protocls of zion.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�

Steven Novella

GADARENE
Banned
Banned
Posts: 513
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:46 am

Post #33

Post by GADARENE »

Justin108 wrote:
GADARENE wrote: I killed him. everyone of us had a part in that darkest deed.

"he bled and died to take my sins away. how great thou art. how great thou art."
Blaming us for the crucifixion is like blaming an emo's ex for him cutting himself. Jesus did that to himself. He could have just made our sins go away (omnipotence) but he chose to be emo about it

he could have taken a vacation in key west. yes sir. you had a part in killing him. never realized it, did ya? for the uninformed, it can be quite a ride.

GADARENE
Banned
Banned
Posts: 513
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:46 am

Post #34

Post by GADARENE »

Bust Nak wrote:
GADARENE wrote: I killed him. everyone of us had a part in that darkest deed.

"he bled and died to take my sins away. how great thou art. how great thou art."
The Bible made it quite clear that taking sins away was conditional. Jesus hasn't take away my sins. Don't blame me for his death.

the sins of the whole world. bought and paid for with his blood. christianity is a bloody religion. you don't have to cash the check with your name on it. but your priceless gift remains in your bank account.

no evidence no belief
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1507
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:18 pm

Post #35

Post by no evidence no belief »

GADARENE wrote:
Justin108 wrote:
GADARENE wrote: I killed him. everyone of us had a part in that darkest deed.

"he bled and died to take my sins away. how great thou art. how great thou art."
Blaming us for the crucifixion is like blaming an emo's ex for him cutting himself. Jesus did that to himself. He could have just made our sins go away (omnipotence) but he chose to be emo about it

he could have taken a vacation in key west. yes sir. you had a part in killing him. never realized it, did ya? for the uninformed, it can be quite a ride.
You are correct. For the uninformed, religion can be quite a ride.

Those of us who are informed, though, see thought the BS quite easily.

FIRST: The story is made up.

SECOND: The story is stupid.

I had as much part in Jesus dying for my sins as I had in Humpty Dumpty having a Great Fall.

no evidence no belief
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1507
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:18 pm

Post #36

Post by no evidence no belief »

GADARENE wrote:
Bust Nak wrote:
GADARENE wrote: I killed him. everyone of us had a part in that darkest deed.

"he bled and died to take my sins away. how great thou art. how great thou art."
The Bible made it quite clear that taking sins away was conditional. Jesus hasn't take away my sins. Don't blame me for his death.

the sins of the whole world. bought and paid for with his blood. christianity is a bloody religion. you don't have to cash the check with your name on it. but your priceless gift remains in your bank account.
What are you talking about dude!

It's a bronze age fairy tale!

Get a grip!

GADARENE
Banned
Banned
Posts: 513
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 12:46 am

Post #37

Post by GADARENE »

no evidence no belief wrote:
GADARENE wrote: I killed him. everyone of us had a part in that darkest deed.

"he bled and died to take my sins away. how great thou art. how great thou art."
So many answers to this absurd statement.

First. It never happened. It's all just a fairy tale until you provide evidence.

Second. It makes no sense. "He died for your sins"? That makes no sense. That's like "He hit his toes with a shovel for your mortgage". How the heck are the two even related!

Third. It's evil. Scapegoating is bad. If I sinned, then I'm responsible for it. You can't take the responsibility for the wrongdoings of a free thinking man away from him by torturing a jewish carpenter 2000 years ago.

Fourth. It's laughable. God got a 14 year old jewish virgin magically pregnant as part of his plan to sacrifice himself to himself in order to create a loophole in his mind that would enable him to forgive us for being the way he created us and thus avoid having to torture us for eternity but rather force us to spend eternity venerating him. It's so dumb it makes the Three Little Piggies sound like Socrates.

are you confessing you never were a christian? god is omnipotent.
is someone going to torture you? why would you let her do that?

"First. It never happened. It's all just a fairy tale until you provide evidence" that was the real jesus, not the rumored jesus, so it isn't a fairy tale. unless you changed your mind

User avatar
Lux
Site Supporter
Posts: 2189
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:27 pm

Post #38

Post by Lux »

Moderator Comment

No evidence no belief, alive, Danmark, dbohm: You all know full well, I assume, that posting one-liners that contribute nothing to the debate is against the rules. If you think a debate is ridiculous, don't participate in it. If you think a user's point of view is a joke, refrain from responding to it unless you are making an argument against it.

That being said, even if this thread was ever an attempt at serious debate it clearly is no longer. Locking.

Please review the Rules.


______________

Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
[center]Image

© Divine Insight (Thanks!)[/center]



"There is more room for a god in science than there is for no god in religious faith." -Phil Plate.

Locked