1213 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 22, 2024 2:21 am
TRANSPONDER wrote: ↑Sun Jul 21, 2024 6:15 am
I reckon that Trump's pull out of the Middle east and Afghanistan (oh yes, it was Trump t who did a deal with the Taliban, not Biden) was because that suited Putin who supported Assad and now Iran .Trump has made it clear that he will not support Ukraine or even Nato, and that is what Putin wants not what US policy needs. Maga dogma is not that Putin in the good guy, his Ukranian land grab is perfectly justified.
Don't ask me how the Maga crazies hear Trump rail against China but is supporting Putin who is being supplied with weapons by China, North Korea and Iran. Maga is on the side of the dictators, led n by Putin. Explain to me how the USA chanting Maga nuts have fount d themselves in that position, how it makes sense or why any American should ever vote for trump, just on that basis, never mind he a grifter, a liar and a criminal.
And you think U.S should have remained in Afghanistan? Why? I think it was right to get out, and it would be best, if U.S. would focus to improve life in their own area and not waste insane amounts of money to war industry.
And about supporting Ukraine, I don't think it really benefits Ukraine in any way to make the war continue. And if war is the way you want, it would be good to at least have some intelligent strategy and goal. Now they are just wasting human life, which apparently is what "democrats" really love. I think best solution for the war would be to let the people vote, do they want to be Ukraine, EU, NATO or Russia. And it is interesting that both sides claim they are for democracy, but still the people are not allowed to vote how they would like to live.
By what I see, Ukraine could have easily avoided this, but war was what they wanted. And that is very sad. And it may be that they lose all their country, if they don't become reasonable. But is it just? Maybe war is always just, people die equally in it.
Funny thing is that by Biden's own words, he is also a dictator. No wonder if you supported him.
But, now i have to tie this back to the topic, which is Paul who allegedly never existed. Maybe it would have been better, if he would not have existed, because he said:
Let every soul be in subjection to the higher authorities, for there is no authority except from God, and those who exist are ordained by God.
Romans 13:1
That may be one reason why the rulers of this world get common people to fight idiotic wars for the rich people. Obviously the matter is not as simple as that single line. But unfortunately many twist words for their evil purposes wishing people stay ignorant. However, this leads to question, if Paul never existed, why would people attribute words to him?
Garbage, as usual. And irrelevant...or no, because you point to an example of Paul's thinking which you don't agree with. But he is the one who invented Christianity. Or, if you dismiss Paul and rely on the gospels, I can debunk that, despite your denial, and show it has to be written by Paulinist Christians.
And now to our political update, so long as we can get away with it

and it is relevant as religion and politics is two sides of the same coin, and Christian fundamentalism and Maga republicanism are two sides of the same three dollar piece.
Oh, yes, like the Ghost Bible, the exuser of aggression, making the victim of invasion out to be the one causing all the death and destruction, for not just letting the invader take whatever they want.
"They took Ukraine, and I said nothing, because I was not Ukraniam"
"Then they took the Baltic states, and I said nothing because I was Finnish"
"Then they came for Finland, and there was nobody left to speak up for me".
The heroic resistance of the Finns in the winter war was all their fault and violent destruction, doing it to their own people, when they should simply have let Russia walk in. Is that the way you see it?
Afghanistan - if you even understood it rather than excuses and dismissal i wouldn't have to respond. That was Bush, using 9./11 as his crusade against world terrorism, "The axle of elvis" as he w saw it. And he has a point as Afghanistan was hosting Al-Quaida. The Iraq war was far less justified, even though it got rid of Saddam.
But the point is that, whether one agrees with the invasion of Afghanistan or the pull out, it was negotiated by Trump as he negotiated pull - outs everywhere and we can save the adult actress jokes. Trump negotiated the surrenders and say what you like it gave Putin a free hand.
And to round off the update, a cloud has lifted, with Biden dropping out. The fear was that Harris is not liked. But I think she could go on the attack and say what Biden couldn't get across - that the Republican candidate is a grifter, a liar and a criminal. And wannabe dictator, not Biden as you claim without a shred of evidence. She might just do, as it became increasingly evident, Biden wouldn't.