Non-believers to BURN IN HELL!

[JoeyKnothead]

Some'll say that if you reject Bible tales, you'll burn in Hell.

For debate:
Please offer some means to confirm the veracity of the claim.

If the claim can't be shown to be true and factual, is it uncivil, or perhaps more importantly morally right to present such an argument in order to encourage religious belief?

Why might a response of "Go to Hell" be inappropriate in the face of such a threat to one's well-being, while the threat itself may receive a pass?

[JoeyKnothead]

Moderator Intervention
It would appear as if you are calling anyone who is Christian an "oddball", specifically EuduChris. This was reported and not only can be construed as a personal attack but also quite uncivil. A central Christian Tenet is that Jesus rose after three days. Please try to remain civil. You have already been issued a formal warning. Any further infractions will lead to a probation vote.
Rules
C&A Guidelines


______________

Moderator interventions do not count as a strike against any posters. They are given at the discretion of a moderator when he or she feels that some sort of intervention is required.

I 'pologize to EduChris personally, and the forum at large. I took a term presented to me and "ran with it", while not realizing it could be so offensive.

[Zetesis Apistia]

Please link to and quote verbatim where I've presented such within this thread. Elsewise, I'll consider this an effort to confuse the issue. You made claims. I challenged them. You admitted your's was a position of faith, implying no such evidence for your challenged claims would be forthcoming.

I will not be dragged into debating claims I've not made.

JoeyKnothead Online
Savant
Avatar

Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Total posts: 9791
Location: Parts Unknown
Gender: Undisclosed
Usergroups:
2008 Most Improved
Appreciate JoeyK
Atheist

Please link to and quote verbatim where I've made such an assertion within this thread. Otherwise I can only conclude that, like the above example, you're trying to confuse the issue.

I will not be dragged into debating claims I've not made.

I drawded dat dare concluzion frum yer yusergrupe enfo.

Having previously shown you can't show you speak truth regarding there being souls, how might'n we know there's heat in 'em?

So are you calling me a liar?

[JoeyKnothead]

From Post 72"

Please link to and quote verbatim where I've made such an assertion within this thread. Otherwise I can only conclude that, like the above example, you're trying to confuse the issue.

I will not be dragged into debating claims I've not made.

I drawded dat dare concluzion frum yer yusergrupe enfo.

Y'all done fouled it all up, I'm here to tell. Belonging to a usergroup is not making a claim within a specific thread. I'm willin' to sort that out a bit better if need be. Or maybe you'd just holler at a moderator and they'd sort it out for ya.

Having previously shown you can't show you speak truth regarding there being souls, how might'n we know there's heat in 'em?

So are you calling me a liar?

Not in the least.

Let's look at what got us here...

...that may well be the offspring of soul suffering...

To which I responded...

Where has Zetesis Apistia shown there's a soul to be a-sufferin'?

To which, Zetesis Apistia has to allow...

I'm going to have to invoke that faith thingy again.

So see, it ain't that I accuse my opponent of being a liar. It's that I accuse him of being unable to show he speaks truth. The observer though, I can't help if they go to thinkin' of it.

[Zetesis Apistia]

Y'all done fouled it all up, I'm here to tell. Belonging to a usergroup is not making a claim within a specific thread. I'm willin' to sort that out a bit better if need be. Or maybe you'd just holler at a moderator and they'd sort it out for ya.

You sneaky rascal I would have guessed you for an atheist. Well dumb on me.

So see, it ain't that I accuse my opponent of being a liar. It's that I accuse him of being unable to show he speaks truth. The observer though, I can't help if they go to thinkin' of it.

Do you work for MSNBC?

[JoeyKnothead]

From Post 74:

You sneaky rascal I would have guessed you for an atheist. Well dumb on me.

If you seek to challenge claims I make, I merely request you link to 'em and quote verbatim the claim in question.

Please do not make my claims for me or presume to know my stance on issues unrelated to the OP.

Do you work for MSNBC?

My work has no bearing on your inability to show your claims are true.

Now that we have all that behind us, can Zetesis Apistia show the claim presented in the OP is true?

[micatala]

Please link to and quote verbatim where I've presented such within this thread. Elsewise, I'll consider this an effort to confuse the issue. You made claims. I challenged them. You admitted your's was a position of faith, implying no such evidence for your challenged claims would be forthcoming.

I will not be dragged into debating claims I've not made.

JoeyKnothead Online
Savant
Avatar

Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Total posts: 9791
Location: Parts Unknown
Gender: Undisclosed
Usergroups:
2008 Most Improved
Appreciate JoeyK
Atheist

Please link to and quote verbatim where I've made such an assertion within this thread. Otherwise I can only conclude that, like the above example, you're trying to confuse the issue.

I will not be dragged into debating claims I've not made.

I drawded dat dare concluzion frum yer yusergrupe enfo.

Having previously shown you can't show you speak truth regarding there being souls, how might'n we know there's heat in 'em?

So are you calling me a liar?

Moderator Warning




Zetesis Apistia has received several comments related to unproductive one-liners and debating civilly and substantively. The post is focusing more on the person being addressed then their arguments. It is really not appropriate to look at a member's usergroups and infer claims based on those usergroups when the member has not stated those within the thread. The sarcastic way you expressed yourself does not help.

Please avoid this kind of behavior in the future.


Please review our Rules.

______________

Moderator warnings count as a strike against users. Additional violations in the future may warrant a final warning. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.