Many believe Jesus was chosen by God to wander around and say nice things. Many believe Jesus was God himself. The question is, on whose authority do people take Jesus to be anything other than a bachelor who lived till he as thirty, with his parents, then spouted the Scripture he'd been fed on?
Who says Jesus was special and what is their qualification for saying so?
And who said Jesus is God and on what basis did they make this claim? In this case, why didn't the claimants explain the problem of two Gods rolled into one?
Who identified Jesus for us?
Moderator: Moderators
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6047
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6893 times
- Been thanked: 3244 times
Post #51
That's a two-way street 1213. The lack of contradictions have always been in the interpretations or assumptions people have.
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
- Difflugia
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3833
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 10:25 am
- Location: Michigan
- Has thanked: 4112 times
- Been thanked: 2442 times
Post #52
One of the assumptions that I have is that the Bible writers meant what they wrote. Inerrantists don't share that assumption with me, which limits our ability to have meaningful conversations about biblical contradiction.1213 wrote:I have not seen any real contradiction in the Bible. The contradictions have always been in the interpretations or assumptions people have.
- 1213
- Savant
- Posts: 12753
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 447 times
- Been thanked: 468 times
Post #53
I think that is good assumption, I also assume the writers mean what they said. By that way I have not seen any contradictions in the Bible.Difflugia wrote:One of the assumptions that I have is that the Bible writers meant what they wrote. Inerrantists don't share that assumption with me, which limits our ability to have meaningful conversations about biblical contradiction.1213 wrote:I have not seen any real contradiction in the Bible. The contradictions have always been in the interpretations or assumptions people have.
My new book can be read freely from here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view
Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view
Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html
- 1213
- Savant
- Posts: 12753
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 447 times
- Been thanked: 468 times
Post #54
If so, why choose the contradictory interpretation instead of noncontradictory? What if I would begin to intentionally make contradictory interpretations of what you say and twist what you meant to mean something totally different?brunumb wrote:That's a two-way street 1213. The lack of contradictions have always been in the interpretations or assumptions people have.
My new book can be read freely from here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view
Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view
Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html
- Difflugia
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3833
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2019 10:25 am
- Location: Michigan
- Has thanked: 4112 times
- Been thanked: 2442 times
Post #55
To whom did each Gospel writer say Peter addressed his three denials?1213 wrote:I think that is good assumption, I also assume the writers mean what they said. By that way I have not seen any contradictions in the Bible.
Mark: A servant girl, the same servant girl, the bystanders
Matthew: A servant girl, a different servant girl, the bystanders.
Luke: A servant girl, a man, a different man.
John: A servant girl, "they," one of the servants.
Is that also what they meant?
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6047
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6893 times
- Been thanked: 3244 times
Post #56
[Replying to post 54 by 1213]
When the contradiction is quite apparent without any twisting of the text, then trying to establish non-contradiction becomes the deliberate choice with an obvious motive behind it.If so, why choose the contradictory interpretation instead of noncontradictory? What if I would begin to intentionally make contradictory interpretations of what you say and twist what you meant to mean something totally different?
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.