William wrote:
[
Replying to post 128 by Thomas123]
William: So if I understand you correctly, you are suggesting that human beings are conditioned to appreciate a human image as 'god' than that of a planet, even that the planet itself is obviously the provider and sustainer of human life.
You didn't answer my end-question re 'worship'...
"If so, who is to say that The Earth Entity does not have the same attitude as YHWH? For that matter, who is to say that The Earth Entity and YHWH are not one and the same?"
Remember, we are not speaking of form here. We are speaking of attitude which comes through form.
William: If so, who is to say that The Earth Entity does not have the same attitude as YHWH?For that matter, who is to say that The Earth Entity and YHWH are not one and the same?
................................
This is a question of subjective form as you appear to suggest.
The primate is conditioned to respond to the form of it's troop.
The external environment is one step beyond.
There are serious confinements attached to all the metaphorical representations of God in human worship. These are blunt tools for the task but they are cognitive tools, nevertheless.
Is Yahweh the Creator God of Genesis, the same as the Earth Entity?
Definitely not!
Even from the start Yahweh is more than that.
How do you metaphorically expand the Earth entity in any meaningful metaphorical way fit for general human consumption.
Your video is a fine utopian wish, imho
ps: Yahweh iconography is generally a step too far and pictures of Jesus are basically Disney. There is alot of this about, particularly in Christianity. We seem to have a reinforcement need for populist propaganda within our faiths that probably has to be accepted. I would use the earths beauty ,in photography,as an accurate representation of God's work and when combined sincerely with Scripture it would be instructive.