A Letter for

Pointless Posts, Raves n Rants, Obscure Opinions

Moderator: Moderators

A Freeman
Banned
Banned
Posts: 356
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2025 8:03 am
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 38 times

A Letter for

Post #1

Post by A Freeman »

A Letter for Atheists & Agnostics:-


I hope this finds you well, in good spirit and having a good day.

For centuries, people have tried to reconcile the differences between science and religion, in an effort to prove or disprove the existence of God, never realizing that they have been duped.

Science endeavors to explain the world around us through observation and conjecture, followed by testing and trying to make sense of the information gathered. A cause and effect relationship is observed when possible and measured, assumptions are made which in turn give way to theories, which then require experimentation and testing to prove or disprove those theories. In general terms this process is known as the scientific method of evaluation.

One question that is seldom considered in this approach is whether the scientific evaluation process itself is fundamentally flawed. If we objectively observe the world around us, it should be self-evident that science isn't just attempting to study and understand the world we live in; it is trying to alter it in the name of "progress". That is the very nature of scientific and technological "advancement" today and it is an extremely egotistical and self-destructive approach to attempt to understand our natural surroundings, much less our relationship with those surroundings and all of the lessons that have been built into them.

Consider for a moment how often scientific theories are manipulated into so-called scientific fact only to later be disproved with the discovery or exposure of additional evidence. That process is affectionately referred to in some circles as "the learning curve", but it offers undeniable proof that our understanding is extremely limited, even at our present level of sophistication. Bearing that in mind, is it really logical to tamper with things that we don't fully understand? Applying the scientific method and a modicum of common sense should make it clear that what we are doing to this planet, which is our life support system, is completely insane.


Oxygen & life, in exchange for money & death, to buy things we don't need.

We have used science and improved technology to help cut down nearly 2/3rds of the world's rain forests, which are the lungs of this planet, and we are steadily working on the final third...for profit. Where will we buy oxygen when we finish cutting down the last third? The rain-forests, in producing oxygen, also get rid of carbon-dioxide from the atmosphere, so it not only doesn’t poison everyone, but also doesn’t cause a “green-house effect”, which will over-heat the planet, change all of the world’s weather-patterns, melt the ice-caps and destroy everything.

Environmental Damage

Have any of the scientific experts studying our impact on the planet considered that the cause of the recent and exponential increase in flooding might have something to do with the amount of water that millions of trees, before they were cut down, used to use and store?

There's an old Cree Indian prophecy that sums this up rather succinctly:

When all of the trees are cut down;
When all of the rivers and lakes are polluted;
When all of the fish have been caught from the sea;
Only then will we realize that money cannot be eaten.

A Freeman
Banned
Banned
Posts: 356
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2025 8:03 am
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 38 times

Re: A Letter for

Post #11

Post by A Freeman »

Understanding the Law of Chance

Émile Borel, a distinguished French expert on probability, stated what he called “the single law of chance”, or merely “the law of chance”, in these words:

“Events whose probability is extremely small never occur”13.

He calculated that probabilities smaller than 1/10^15 were negligible on the terrestrial scale, and he went on to say:

"We may be led to set at 10^-50 (1 in 10^50 odds) the value of negligible probabilities on the cosmic scale. When the probability of an event is below this limit, the opposite event may be expected to occur with certainty, whatever the number of occasions presenting themselves in the entire universe."

By “opposite event”, he means no event, or failure to occur. So thinking that even one gene could arrange itself by chance into any usable order in the entire universe isn't remotely realistic, if we apply this statement by the eminent mathematician. Simply stated another way, by the single law of chance, it will NEVER occur.

Not in a million years. Not even in 15 billion.


The Darwinian Leap of Faith

Dr. Joseph L. Henson, biologist, stated that to believe in Darwinian evolution, one has to have “faith to believe that the statistically improbable is going to happen again and again and again.”14 But when the statistically improbable is as completely improbable as 1/10722 for just the first gene to arrange itself, consider what kind of unfounded leap of faith would be required!

There is absolutely nothing scientific about believing in Darwinism. Contrary to the popular Darwinian-inspired pick-up truck bumper sticker, "stuff" doesn’t just happen. No matter how much time is provided, inanimate objects NEVER reorganize themselves into life and DNA didn't program itself nor will it ever do so. The theory that this was possible was based on completely erroneous assumptions without any scientific proof at the time, much less all of the information that is now available about DNA and how it works. And we've really only begun to scratch the surface of understanding this extraordinarily engineered basic building block of life.

DNA is a code. DNA is a language. DNA is the most efficient data storage device known to man. DNA is an assembly line for life, carrying out incredibly detailed instructions on a molecular level in every single cell of every single living organism everywhere. And most importantly, DNA is proof positive that NOTHING happens by chance, just as the probability statistics have clearly shown.

So let's call Darwinism what it really is: an organized religion.

ALL organized religion is based on lies with a little bit of the truth mixed in to sell it, to lead us away from God. Darwinism is no different. There has never been any actual scientific proof of evolutionary theory which at best was based on flawed assumptions. It's really always been about one thing and one thing only:

"...the point of evolutionary theory is to explain phenomena without having to appeal to intelligence or divine design".

Starting with a theory and ignoring the overwhelming body of evidence that disproves that theory isn't logical or scientific at all. It's simply dishonest. We haven't gone for a walk in the forest and found a watch; instead we've found a watch factory of unparalleled ingenuity, intricacy and precision, which is well beyond our comprehension. We then arrogantly/ignorantly questioned the existence of the factory Owner because He didn't make a special appearance as we thought He should despite His EXPLICIT contact instructions being ignored.

He told us NOT to go to a church to talk to Him. A church is just a building, and it can have stained glass windows and crosses or it can have textbooks and lab equipment. God isn't human and He doesn't live in a building; He wants to live in the hearts of each and every one of us as an invited guest. The only thing that stands in the way of this happening is our own arrogance/ignorance. And this egotistical and self-destructive approach to life will NEVER lead to the Truth.

Romans 1:18-25
1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all unGodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the Truth as unrighteousness;
1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest to them; for God hath showed [it] unto them.
1:20 For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] His eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified [Him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
1:23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
1:24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
1:25 Who changed the Truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, Who is blessed for ever. Amen.

User avatar
otseng
Savant
Posts: 20832
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 362 times
Contact:

Re: A Letter for

Post #12

Post by otseng »

Moderator Action



Moved to Random Ramblings. Please review the Rules and Tips on starting a debate topic.


Post Reply