Woland wrote:Angel wrote:
If you read ALL of the relevant passages which I've quoted in this post, you'll see that Israel engaged in IDOLATRY and SEXUAL IMMORALITY with prostitutes in Peor. BOTH of these acts are IMMORAL based on the Bible so WRONGDOING was involved as well as God's vengeance, it was NOT ONLY vengeance.
Let's summarize. Feel free to correct me or to add anything anywhere.
A few people didn't praise Yahweh, but praised other "false" gods for some reason -which is already strange (read: incoherent), since presumably if they knew their gods were false and that only Yahweh existed they wouldn't be idolaters. If ancient humans were THAT stupid then they can hardly be held accountable for their actions, because "free will" is utterly meaningless in the face of someone who is dumb enough to worship gods he knows don't exist when it will anger the one true "loving" bipolar maniac in the sky which he knows exists.
And if they didn't know that, then Yahweh seems more than a bit incompetent and negligent.
And cruel.
I don't agree with you completely because after Israel left Egypt they manufactured a golden calf and worshipped it as a god despite knowing about the God of their forefathers - Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. That sounds to me more of not caring if God is true and instead just putting what you want to worship and calling it a god. It's a matter of the will more than stupidity. So that's one case example.
The definition of 'idolatry' in the biblical context is worshipping idols or gods other than the God of Israel. It doesn't matter whether it's done in ignorance or not, that is still the standard. You may not agree with the moral standard but that doesn't mean that it wasn't violated. At best, we can say the Midianites violated a standard of a selfish control freak and all the other adjectives you've used in your post.
Woland wrote:
So,
1.Yahweh was upset because didn't get his dose of praise from a random tribe in the desert. Pettiness.
Not completely. God was upset because the Midianites led HIS people, Israel, into worshipping Baal, the Midianite's god.
Woland wrote:
And,
2. Some people had sex in ways and contexts that aren't compatible with Yahweh's orders, and that upset him. Control-freakedness.
3. Therefore Yahweh took his vengeance on an entire population. Cruelty. But he still somehow deserves to be called good and loving and just, or so claim his worshipers.
Sexual immorality as defined by the Bible is still a moral standard whether you like it or not. So going by the moral standard, teh Midianites were in the wrong. Keep in mind, I'm not arguing for if that moral standard is 'objectively' right, I'm just saying according to the Bible it is a moral standard and what the Midianites did was violate it.
Woland wrote:
What makes you think that the vengeance Autodidact was speaking of didn't take into consideration the reasons you apparently consider to morally justify Yahweh's genocidal vengeance? He just said it was vengance, which it was. Was it vengeance for anything? Well, sure, depending on who you consider the offended party and how exactly they were offended in a way that requires mass graves.
Please read Numbers 25:16-18 which I've also quoted in post #5. That passage mentions that first time God mentions to kill the Midianites. There's no mention of 'vengeance' in those passages and vengeance is mentioned later in Numbers ch. 31. To say that God wanted the Midianites dead for ONLY vengeance would have to take ignoring Numbers 25:16-18 along with Numbers 31:15-16.
This debate that me and Autodidact have been has involved some technicalities but I'm willing to go there just to expose when someone has a practice of leaving out details just to make a picture seem worse than what it is. Reading Autodidact's post, you'd be left with thinking God just wanted vengeance just for the sake of vengeance. You wouldn't have known that the Midianites led Israel into idolatry and sexual immorality. You would not have known that the Midianite leaders conspired with Balaam to lure Israel into these immoral acts (Numbers 15:16). Perhaps, that would be a valid point if Autodidact was only referring to the children who died in that attack, but no,
Autodidact is referring to the entire slaughter.
Woland wrote:
Mafia bosses exert vengeance on those who don't bow to them too, you know.
And we don't see many people without a gun at their heads calling them "good" and "loving", do we?
This topic seems to be nothing but a distraction.
If it's a distraction to you then you don't have to post here again. I'm well within the forum rules of asking this question. The question you just asked is beyond the scope of the OP and can get to become a distraction if you keep asking it. I repeat, I did NOT open this thread to debate about if vengeance is right or wrong. I open this thread to discuss ALL of the reasons involved for why God wanted the Midianites dead.
Woland wrote:
As far as I can discern, nowhere did Autodidact imply that Yahweh and his groupies wouldn't have any excuses at the ready for his vengeful and cruel orders and actions. He has stated as much repeatedly.
Refer to post #1 of this thread. Autodidact only mentioned 'vengeance'. I'm the one that had to expose his leaving out of details for making it sound like it was vengeance just for the sake of vengeance.
Woland wrote:
Wouldn't it annoy you if you told someone that "the mafia boss killed the baker's children for vengeance" and JUST after you readily acknowledged the "reasons" for his vengeance, someone kept telling you the same irrelevant things overassertively:
Please do NOT attempt to change the subject of the topic post. You SPECIFICALLY made the claim that the maffia boss ordered for the children of the baker who didn't pay his protection money to be killed out of His vengeance ONLY. This thread is not about if vengeance is right or who was killed, it's about reason(s) that the maffia boss had an issue with the children. You wanted to make it appear as if there was NO wrongdoing whatsoever involved, and I called you out on your pattern of leaving out details.
I would think so.
Does anyone care WHY the maffia boss wanted these children killed?
Yes. I would also say vengeance would be a WHY answer, as well. Also, there's a difference between vengeance just for the sake vengeance, and vengeance supplemented with reasons involving WRONGdoings.
Woland wrote:
Unless your view is the equivalent of saying that the baker's "misdeeds" (highly arguable word of course, just like for praising other gods and having sex, big deal) somehow (tell me how and why) become the children's moral responsibility despite there being an "omnipotent and all-wise and loving" god watching the whole thing, your god's vengeance is nothing but a demonstration of his detestable, cruel and vain personality.
-Woland
I'm not here to argue if God's actions were right, I'm just here to debate ALL of God's reasons for wanting the Midianites dead.. we can even say the kids don't apply, if you'd like.