Why worship a "god" that threatens you?
Moderator: Moderators
- OpiatefortheMasses
- Apprentice
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 2:39 am
- Location: Toledo, Ohio
Why worship a "god" that threatens you?
Post #1I'm reasonably sure that to extort something from someone else would constitute a sin of some kind according to most Christians but why is it OK when the very religion itself employs it? Most of the Christians I've talked to over the years would describe their "god" as fair, just, loving etc. but extortion (among other things) really strikes me as cruel and manipulative. Is this a "god" that's truly worthy of a person's worship or adoration?
Post #131
Why do most of us love our earthly fathers even though they threaten us quite a bit?
Why would I love or worship a God that knew of the many dangers that present themselves in our lives and not make them and their consequences known to us?
The God who didn't do this would have to be an evil sort of God.
This doesn't seem like a very contentious issue to me.
Why would I love or worship a God that knew of the many dangers that present themselves in our lives and not make them and their consequences known to us?
The God who didn't do this would have to be an evil sort of God.
This doesn't seem like a very contentious issue to me.
- Metatron
- Guru
- Posts: 2165
- Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 12:32 pm
- Location: Houston, Texas
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #132
I don't recall that my father ever threatened to set me on fire if I didn't obey him. Had he done so, I suspect that this would have altered my perception of him somewhat.1robin wrote: Why do most of us love our earthly fathers even though they threaten us quite a bit?
The problem with this is some of the greatest dangers and most dire consequences were set in place by God himself. Should I love a God who is willing to torture a majority of mankind forever?1robin wrote: Why would I love or worship a God that knew of the many dangers that present themselves in our lives and not make them and their consequences known to us?
A God who mandates original sin and eternal damnation would seem like an evil sort of God to me.1robin wrote:The God who didn't do this would have to be an evil sort of God.
Post #133
Earthly fathers aren't perfect. God is (at least it's said to be). Making the apples-to-apples comparison between the two is somewhat faulty at best.1robin wrote:Why do most of us love our earthly fathers even though they threaten us quite a bit?
And as Meta said, threatening with death is somewhat...off-putting...of an earthly father, much less a perfect devine one.
Post #134
No need to apologize. Its not your fault I wasn't "blessed" with your vision.evangelist wrote:Almighty God did not create robots or dummies ... He created beings with free will.Morphine wrote:"...why man is naturally evil..." Um. Wouldnt that mean it's all his (God's) fault.evangelist wrote:
The one and only Living God has simply told us of our condition and the condition of the world.
He has told us why man is naturally evil now, and why our world is full of sickness and death.
Is it so terrible of Him to tell us the truth?
He originally created everything perfect, and man was to spend all of eternity with Him in Heaven.
But, He created man to have free will ... and we rebelled and refused to go along with Him.
So, now He has arranged to take only some of His creation to be with Him.
It's His ball game ... sorry, He makes the rules.
That's what's happening ... whether you like it or not.
Every attribute we have, both good and bad, can be credited to him.
Since he is the one who created us and knew the outcome (all knowing).
These beings used their free will to reject God, refuse to obey Him, etc.
And God responded by saying, "Okay, here's My grace, mercy, love, etc. ...
I won't throw all of you in the garbage dump, but I will endeavor to save some of you ...
because My Son desires to have some close and loving companions with Him in Heaven."
Because up to that point, all that God had with Him in Heaven were angels.
This is how Christians see things ... sorry if some of you can't see the Scriptures this way.
Don't take that smart remark personally or anything. It was just a joke. But at the same time, it shows how others are apparently at a disadvantage when it comes to getting into heaven and avoiding hell.
Which brings us back to the topic. Why worship such a god that punishes those who are "unable" to see things a particular way. Sure. There are some people who believe in God, yet reject him for whatever reason. But there are also people who don't believe in God because they are unable to. I find it incredibly hard to believe that a being who is more loving than anyone on this planet, would send someone to hell for being mistaken.
Thats not someone I would want to worship. I mean I might worship him anyway. But it would be out of fear.
Post #135
I don't think our earthly fathers would be consider good or loving fathers if they tortured their children for not following every one of their rules and not repenting after being disobedient.1robin wrote:Why do most of us love our earthly fathers even though they threaten us quite a bit?
Why would I love or worship a God that knew of the many dangers that present themselves in our lives and not make them and their consequences known to us?
The God who didn't do this would have to be an evil sort of God.
This doesn't seem like a very contentious issue to me.
- OpiatefortheMasses
- Apprentice
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 2:39 am
- Location: Toledo, Ohio
Post #136
1robin wrote:Why do most of us love our earthly fathers even though they threaten us quite a bit?
None of them are threatening eternal torture for simply doubting them though. When my parents punished or threatened to punish me when I was misbehaving I would at least have a chance to learn from the mistake and make good by it. You can't do that if you're being eternally tortured in hell.
You could argue that real life consequences can be learned or taught since their demonstrable unlike hell or sin.1robin wrote:Why would I love or worship a God that knew of the many dangers that present themselves in our lives and not make them and their consequences known to us?
That depends. Like I said, with real life consequences there's the fact that they can learned or taught. If a parent doesn't teach a child to not touch a hot stove or something to that effect are they evil. I'd say negligent is more applicable.1robin wrote:The God who didn't do this would have to be an evil sort of God.
It depends on who you're talking to. Some people would like to believe that the "god" of the bible is a loving "god" and discussions like this tend to make that seem less likely.1robin wrote:This doesn't seem like a very contentious issue to me.
"Not all who wander are lost" J. R. R. Tolkien
Post #137
The actual facts surrounding this topic, as I see it anyway, is that 'eternal torture in hell' is a mainstream Christian construct ...perhaps Catholic initially ...and not a 'God' concept per se. So, we must not blame God for something that is not His doing. 'Eternal torture' for the (perceived) 'unrighteous' isn't found in the Bible. Christians are the ones who condemn people to hell. Too many of them, unbelievably, appear to relish in the idea of others being tormented in hot coals. And, it would appear that the comments made by Jesus pertaining to hell had Him using common folklore of the time with which to make specific points to the hypocritical Pharisees. Jesus, as always, was using figurative speech.OpiatefortheMasses wrote:1robin wrote:Why do most of us love our earthly fathers even though they threaten us quite a bit?
None of them are threatening eternal torture for simply doubting them though. When my parents punished or threatened to punish me when I was misbehaving I would at least have a chance to learn from the mistake and make good by it. You can't do that if you're being eternally tortured in hell.
You could argue that real life consequences can be learned or taught since their demonstrable unlike hell or sin.1robin wrote:Why would I love or worship a God that knew of the many dangers that present themselves in our lives and not make them and their consequences known to us?
That depends. Like I said, with real life consequences there's the fact that they can learned or taught. If a parent doesn't teach a child to not touch a hot stove or something to that effect are they evil. I'd say negligent is more applicable.1robin wrote:The God who didn't do this would have to be an evil sort of God.
It depends on who you're talking to. Some people would like to believe that the "god" of the bible is a loving "god" and discussions like this tend to make that seem less likely.1robin wrote:This doesn't seem like a very contentious issue to me.
Hell is the grave and we will all spend a certain amount of time there when we die. We will know nothing (as per the Bible) so we most certainly will not be tormented or even have any knowledge of being tormented. If the resurrection prediction takes place as per the scriptures, then many will rise from the grave to begin eternal life. As said previously (by me ), the amount of professed Christians that are in complete ignorance about the book they purport to uphold would be enough to sink a battleship.
- OpiatefortheMasses
- Apprentice
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 2:39 am
- Location: Toledo, Ohio
Post #138
Unfortunately there are just way too many different interpretations of the bible and there's really no way to say what's being interpreted correctly. The nature of "god" and scripture varies from person to person let alone denomination to denomination. A person with a negative outlook on the world may love the classic "fire & brimstone" version of "god" while others may just stick to the "sermon on the mount". Honestly, if there is a "god" out there I'm sure he's shaking his head saying "man, what is up with these people?"KCKID wrote:The actual facts surrounding this topic, as I see it anyway, is that 'eternal torture in hell' is a mainstream Christian construct ...perhaps Catholic initially ...and not a 'God' concept per se. So, we must not blame God for something that is not His doing. 'Eternal torture' for the (perceived) 'unrighteous' isn't found in the Bible. Christians are the ones who condemn people to hell. Too many of them, unbelievably, appear to relish in the idea of others being tormented in hot coals. And, it would appear that the comments made by Jesus pertaining to hell had Him using common folklore of the time with which to make specific points to the hypocritical Pharisees. Jesus, as always, was using figurative speech.
Hell is the grave and we will all spend a certain amount of time there when we die. We will know nothing (as per the Bible) so we most certainly will not be tormented or even have any knowledge of being tormented. If the resurrection prediction takes place as per the scriptures, then many will rise from the grave to begin eternal life. As said previously (by me ), the amount of professed Christians that are in complete ignorance about the book they purport to uphold would be enough to sink a battleship.
Personally, I think the "eternal torture" version of hell was borrowed from other religions or mythologies. If you look at Tartarus (Greek) or Tuonela (Finnish) among others they seem very similar the mainstream Christian version of hell so it's entirely possible that hell in Christianity is merely an amalgamation of sorts.
"Not all who wander are lost" J. R. R. Tolkien
-
- Student
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 8:25 pm
- Location: San Diego
Post #139
Man has no excuse for not clearly seeing God in nature ... and in his conscience (mentioned elsewhere).Morphine wrote: Why worship such a god that punishes those who are "unable" to see things a particular way.
Sure. There are some people who believe in God, yet reject him for whatever reason.
But there are also people who don't believe in God because they are unable to.
After clearly recognizing the reality and existence of God, man is expected to worship Him.
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men,
who suppress the truth in unrighteousness,
19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them.
20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen,
being understood by the things that are made,
even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse,
21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful,
but became futile in their thoughts,
and their foolish hearts were darkened.
22 Professing to be wise, they became fools,
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind,
to do those things which are not fitting;
29 being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness;
full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers,
30 backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
31 undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful;
32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death,
not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.
.
God's precious Scriptures are of no value to those who cannot (or will not) believe them
"For as many as are being led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God." (Romans 8:14)
.
God's precious Scriptures are of no value to those who cannot (or will not) believe them
"For as many as are being led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God." (Romans 8:14)
.
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Post #140
Well, those bible quotes are the opinion of those who wrote it, but other than an appeal to the authority of the bible, which I do not accept as anything more than the opinion of man, what do you have show 'God is in nature'. That is the logical fallacy of 'begging the question'...evangelist wrote:Man has no excuse for not clearly seeing God in nature ... and in his conscience (mentioned elsewhere).Morphine wrote: Why worship such a god that punishes those who are "unable" to see things a particular way.
Sure. There are some people who believe in God, yet reject him for whatever reason.
But there are also people who don't believe in God because they are unable to.
After clearly recognizing the reality and existence of God, man is expected to worship Him.
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men,
who suppress the truth in unrighteousness,
19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them.
20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen,
being understood by the things that are made,
even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse,
21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful,
but became futile in their thoughts,
and their foolish hearts were darkened.
22 Professing to be wise, they became fools,
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind,
to do those things which are not fitting;
29 being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness;
full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers,
30 backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
31 undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful;
32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death,
not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.
Because you say so, based on an ancient book filled with the opinions of others?? I
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella