Having God on our currency and in our Pledge of Allegiance fuels the false belief that the United States is a Christian nation. As declared in the Treaty of Tripoli, 1796, "...the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion." This was signed by president John Adams. Having God in our currency and in our Pledge of Allegiance directly disrespects those among us who are not of the Christian faith, and it should be removed.
I took that from this site https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petiti ... e/sx9gbfgW
It is a petition to remove 'God' from our currency and pledge of allegiance. Do you agree that this should be done? Why or why not? If you do, please sign this petition.
Remove 'in god we trust'
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 183
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 11:36 pm
- Location: Espionage in the Philippines
Remove 'in god we trust'
Post #1"Faith is the attempt to coerce truth to surrender to whim. In simple terms, it is trying to breathe life into a lie by trying to outshine reality with the beauty of wishes. Faith is the refuge of fools, the ignorant, and the deluded, not of thinking, rational men." - Terry Goodkind.
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post #81
Never said that, I said non-sectarian prayer.PhiloKGB wrote:Your religious beliefs require that students in majority-Christian districts be forced to recite Christian prayers?East of Eden wrote:I'm sorry, but I will obey no law that forces me to violate my religious beliefs.
A better example would be if a majority-Muslim district wanted to observe Ramadan or whatever the Muslim equivalent of Christmas carols would be, I have no objection. Heck, there have been liberal school districts who have forced kids to engage in such Muslim practices, all in the name of diversity.Or, better yet, that students in majority-Muslim districts be forced to pray to Allah?
That's funny, my privileges are the result of being a child of God, with a glorious eternity in store. As the song goes, the futures so bright I gotta wear shades.You see your privilege diminishing, and you don't want it to. It's that simple.
That status has nothing to do with any judge, and would be intact if I were in a jail cell at the hands of a crazed atheist government such as Cuba or China. As it says in Ps. 37, "The Lord laughs at the wicked, for he knows their day is coming." Today's God-haters frighten me about as much.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post #82
You are consistent, as I have long held, there is no basis for a moral judgement if you are an atheist. Makes me wonder by what standard you declare school prayer, or anything else, to be 'wrong'?SailingCyclops wrote:Right and moral are subjective.East of Eden wrote: Is it your position that court rulings are ipso facto right and moral due to their office?
Great, my problem is when activist judges subvert the constitution, as in the cases previously mentioned here.Our system is based on constitutional law.
Last edited by East of Eden on Thu Feb 07, 2013 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post #83
All laws are an imposition of someone's morality. In a majority religious nation there is no reason why a non-sectarian prayer can't be said in schools.SailingCyclops wrote:No, but you have a similar totalitarian wish to force religious indoctrination on my children. You should rejoice that neither my wishes nor yours can be enforced by law.East of Eden wrote:Totalitarian impulse noted. I have no similar wish to force you to attend church.
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
- SailingCyclops
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 5:02 pm
- Location: New York City
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #84
I don't declare school prayer to be "wrong". I simply agree with SCOTUS that prayer in state run schools is illegal. If you have a legal issue with the law, take it up with the courts. If you have a moral or religious issue with that, take it up with your god. Just please leave me out of it.East of Eden wrote:You are consistent, as I have long held, there is no basis for a moral judgement if you are an atheist. Makes me wonder by what standard you declare school prayer, or anything else, to be 'wrong'?
Religion flies you into buildings, Science flies you to the moon.
If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities -- Voltaire
Bless us and save us, said Mrs. O'Davis
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post #85
So it wouldn't have mattered to you which way it was decided?SailingCyclops wrote:I don't declare school prayer to be "wrong".East of Eden wrote:You are consistent, as I have long held, there is no basis for a moral judgement if you are an atheist. Makes me wonder by what standard you declare school prayer, or anything else, to be 'wrong'?
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
- SailingCyclops
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 5:02 pm
- Location: New York City
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #86
Of course it would have mattered to me. I would have seen it as a violation of the constitution my country was founded on, and the constitution I fought and risked my life for. Fortunately, SCOTUS did not put me in that position. I am quite pleased they have seen things through the same constitutional lens I see things.East of Eden wrote:So it wouldn't have mattered to you which way it was decided?
Religion flies you into buildings, Science flies you to the moon.
If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities -- Voltaire
Bless us and save us, said Mrs. O'Davis
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post #87
No doubt the slaveowners said the same of the Dred Scott decision.SailingCyclops wrote:Of course it would have mattered to me. I would have seen it as a violation of the constitution my country was founded on, and the constitution I fought and risked my life for. Fortunately, SCOTUS did not put me in that position. I am quite pleased they have seen things through the same constitutional lens I see things.East of Eden wrote:So it wouldn't have mattered to you which way it was decided?
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE
- SailingCyclops
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1453
- Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 5:02 pm
- Location: New York City
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #88
The FACT is, that we have moved on from our earlier errors, we have learned, become more sane, and have let go of many of our superstitions. Slavery proponents used the bible to support their position. That is no longer the case and It no longer is part of our laws.East of Eden wrote: No doubt the slaveowners said the same of the Dred Scott decision.
Religion flies you into buildings, Science flies you to the moon.
If we believe absurdities, we shall commit atrocities -- Voltaire
Bless us and save us, said Mrs. O'Davis
- JohnPaul
- Banned
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:00 am
- Location: northern California coast, USA
Post #89
East of Eden wrote:
Hmmm. Why don't you lie down and relax for awhile?
You sound a little irrational and even offensive here. Are you saying that religion is the only basis for morality? That is a little frightening, considering the murderous and bloodthirsty history of both Christianity and Islam. The 9-11 terrorist attack was most certainly based on religious morality. Or are you saying that only your own little bit of religion is the only moral and right one, and all others are wrong?You are consistent, as I have long held, there is no basis for a moral judgement if you are an atheist. Makes me wonder by what standard you declare school prayer, or anything else, to be 'wrong'?
Hmmm. Why don't you lie down and relax for awhile?
- East of Eden
- Under Suspension
- Posts: 7032
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:25 pm
- Location: Albuquerque, NM
Post #90
I'm saying that without God there is no objective basis for morality. See http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcrai ... a-eth.htmlJohnPaul wrote: East of Eden wrote:You sound a little irrational and even offensive here. Are you saying that religion is the only basis for morality?You are consistent, as I have long held, there is no basis for a moral judgement if you are an atheist. Makes me wonder by what standard you declare school prayer, or anything else, to be 'wrong'?
You really want to play that numbers game, with atheisms 100,000,000 death toll last century?That is a little frightening, considering the murderous and bloodthirsty history of both Christianity and Islam.
Yes, they were following the word and deed of the 'prophet'. We both agree that is a false religion, correct?The 9-11 terrorist attack was most certainly based on religious morality.
I actually have a more liberal view of other religions than you, you believe that what men have deeply believed for all of human history is wrong (God), I believe there is truth in other relgions, but where they and Christianity differ, they are wrong.Or are you saying that only your own little bit of religion is the only moral and right one, and all others are wrong?
Gratuitous insult noted. That's your idea of debate?Hmmm. Why don't you lie down and relax for awhile?
"We are fooling ourselves if we imagine that we can ever make the authentic Gospel popular......it is too simple in an age of rationalism; too narrow in an age of pluralism; too humiliating in an age of self-confidence; too demanding in an age of permissiveness; and too unpatriotic in an age of blind nationalism." Rev. John R.W. Stott, CBE