Suppose religion is the art of make believe. Clifford Geertz explain in
Anthropology of religion the make believe acts of faith like this:
Anthropology of religion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropology_of_religion
I find what he says there to support that faith in God is an act of make believe.(1) a system of symbols which acts to
(2) establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by
(3) formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and
(4) clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that
(5) the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic" (Geertz 1966).
Some Atheists lack the inner motivation for to make such belief.
I have the inner motivation for to make believe but I lack the needed know how.
Edit
Did you notice that I do Anthropology of religion
and that I don't do "Does God exist of philosophic Ontology
and I don't do Does the atheists lack belief in gods.
I start with the soft science Anthropology of religion
and take their most famous or agreed upon definition of religion
and then look at if atheists have that inner motivation and conclude
that they lack such inner motivation. It is a huge difference as I get it.
the soft science do say that religions are made by us humans.
that means that the gods are made by these humans. Make believe gods.
So to ask if these gods exist is to not understand
that believers have inner motivation to make believe that God exist.
Edit 2
if you are good at logic and English then please translate this to less abstract words
(1) a system of symbols which acts to
(2) establish powerful, pervasive, and long-lasting moods and motivations in men by
(3) formulating conceptions of a general order of existence and
(4) clothing these conceptions with such an aura of factuality that
(5) the moods and motivations seem uniquely realistic" (Geertz 1966)