Zzyzx wrote:
.
arian wrote:
Zzyzx wrote:
arian wrote:
I seen a meteor like UFO with my co worker pass between us, and it didn't speak, just flew by us several times. It was years before I figured out that it must have been a demon from the supernatural realm.
Is this your "evidence" for a claim of seeing "demons?" You saw something that may have been a meteor and years later "FIGURE OUT that it must have been a demon from the supernatural realm."
I said "it looked like a meteor" .. the shape, .. lol See, you do have a good sense of humor.
Did you see a meteor, a demon, a light spot in the sky? I would venture a GUESS that you don't know what it was but later "concluded" that it was a "demon" with no supporting evidence at all (outside your own imagination). Correct?
Hey Z old buddy, what's your hang up? Come on man, let's debate OK? Please? This is no longer debating my friend.
Here again, slower this time:
We, me and my coworker seen a two foot long, grayish meteor like UFO that came from above and when we seen it, it was about 40 feet away closing in on us.
We seen it go right between us, went past us and over the fence about 30 feet away,
turned around making a small loop (didn't suddenly just stop and change directions like the UFO light sightings we've seen videoed over the years) and flew between us again.
Then it went over the fence the direction it first came from, again it made a small loop, turned around and came between us again the third time, and then it disappeared.
The buzzer rang and we quit playing basketball and went back to work.
As I started my machine, I was taken over by a terrible rage, and as we stood in the isles waiting for the minute or so to warm up the CNC machines again, I was telling my co-workers that I will smash that annoying, backstabbing little Asian (everyone agreed he was annoying and a backstabber, that's who he was, not something that I felt at the moment)
They stared at me, and cautiously, gently talked me out of doing anything stupid, and slowly I cooled down. Yes, I felt my whole body inflamed, as if high fever suddenly took me over, and then I literally 'cooled' down.
About an hour later, after I cooled down and recollected myself and we were all back to work, the incident we saw came to mind. I quickly went over to my co-worker and started to ask him what the hell that was that we seen.
As I brought this up, his continence changed, his hands trembled and then he turned and told me:
"I don't want to talk about it!"
I asked again:
"But man, that was weird don't you think? I mean it flew right between us, then over the fence and, .."
But this time with sternness he told me right to my face:
"Look, .. I really don't want to talk about it! OK?!"
This IS what happened, .. it is NOT what "I think happened, it is not what I think I've seen, but it IS what happened and exactly what I've seen.
But I have yet to see, or read a science news report of a Higgs boson, or a speck of quantum string, or gravity suddenly inflate and create a universe, and yet they claim Higgs bosons, specks of gravity and string as in string theory are everywhere.
The problem I see right off the bat is that the conditions of them Big-banging is wrong. They need to take these quantum specks outside our universe, into 'nothing' and they should pop universes into being like pop-corn.
Now I have shown you two trains of thought, which one sounds actual and which sounds questionable Z? Be honest now!?
Zzyzx wrote:Notice that when I am guessing about something, I clearly identify it as such.
That is a good practice, especially when someone asks you if you are married or not, and your wife is standing right next to you. I mean saying: "Well, .. I kind of, .. I really don't know how to answer that, .. well I guess I am!?" cold get husbands to sleep on the couch for a while, right?
Zzyzx wrote:arian wrote:
Zzyzx wrote:
arian wrote:
men did help me when I was young up till I was 12 years old and saved me from all kinds of danger. I did notice that they always just seemed to disappear, but not as I was looking at them. They would take me to safety, or tell me what to do to get to safety.
Were those men "demons" or something else? What did you "figure out" about them?
No, as I said: "They were men" like you and me, no different, even their clothes hair, shaved, talk and everything else was like you and me, .. well not old, they looked to be in their 30's, .. every one I've seen.
Okay, the "demons" you "saw" appeared to be thirty year old men. What distinguished them from other thirty-year old men (who are not demons)?
LOL, I hope you are having fun. It's times like these that it is good to be a moderator, .. ay Z? Like Mel Brooks said in one of his movies as he was walking through his garden as a king and lifting the maids skirts up, looked straight into the camera and said:
"It's good to be the King!"
No Z, .. the men were men, why would I call men that came in the most critical moments of my life and helped me, demons? It's just common sense, it's simple logic, .. unless you worship Deities/demons as God! Then yes, things could get really confusing.
I am not, or no longer easily confused. When i was young and someone at a party gave me peyote mushrooms and I was seeing things, I still knew that it was the mushrooms causing the hallucinations. I know this will also shock you, but I know the difference between dreaming and when I see 2 foot long meteor-like UFO flying around me.
I don't, nor have I
ever asked myself;
"Am I dreaming, or is this real?"
Zzyzx wrote:arian wrote:
It is from all the years of learning, putting things together that I have come to the conclusion who they may have been.
Before getting sidetracked again and again, kindly tell us what you concluded and why you reached that conclusion – based on what evidence.
It's like I described above.
Zzyzx wrote:arian wrote:
Zzyzx wrote:
arian wrote:
But you still see people talking to no one there, right? So I guess I'm not the only one with serious mental problems ay?
Some have mental problems, some have vivid imagination, some have been convinced or indoctrinated to believe that invisible, undetectable, supernatural entities influence human lives. It may be difficult to distinguish between those conditions.
I agree, this is why I want evidence of the Spiritual,
Several of us have asked what is the evidence to which you refer. So far all that has been presented is personal / emotional / psychological testimonials and conjectures. Is there more?
And I have answered over and over again;
our 'mind' is spiritual. You cannot see it, I cannot see it, but we know it is there.
Zzyzx wrote:arian wrote:
and have learned to distinguish between good and bad spirits, visible or not.
Kindly describe the means by which "good spirits" can be distinguished from "bad spirits."
The bad will influence you:
"Go beat that sob, pulverize him! Go ahead, he deserves it!"
The Good Spirits will influence either you, if at the moment that's not possible then influences others around you saying:
"Odon, you have so much going for you, do you really want to blow it because you are angry right now?"
I know, I know, now you will say:
There is no 'good' or 'bad', it just depends on how each evolving animal/apes instinct drives him/it at the moment, .. or something like that.
Zzyzx wrote:arian wrote:
As I said: "My faith is built on substance with evidence",
Before getting distracted once again, kindly present the evidence to which you refer.
Have you ever dreamed that you were dreaming? I have, and when I woke up from both dreams, I could tell you which one was the dream of my dream, and which was the dream, and the difference that I am awake now. It was pretty cool, and I remember telling my family about it.
What I'm saying is, that people can accept a lie as 'evidence', so I can present evidence after evidence to you (generic you) but if you have trouble distinguishing between an animal and a human, that both could be just animal, the evidence is meaningless. That person is now driven by religious indoctrinations and no longer can differentiate between real science and science fiction. They will understand things like:
"Gay" to mean homosexual and happy, and when you say "I'm gay" they will choose the meaning to that by instinct, either happy or homosexual depending how they feel at the moment. Reasoning with people like that is futile.
Zzyzx wrote:arian wrote:
No, .. no you guys haven't seen me in person (not that I know of anyways), but that's not my fault, I have suggested meeting with my fellow debaters many times before.
If you are sincere in wanting to meet fellow debaters you can accept my invitation to visit Arkansas. When will you arrive at the Little Rock airport?
Are you serious Z? Please say yes? PM me, .. please?
Zzyzx wrote:arian wrote:
And yes, I understand that most of the things I write about may seem 'gibberish' to you, and there are many reasons for that; and how you value my Undeniable Scientific evidence of The Creator reveals that.
When "undeniable scientific evidence" consists of personal testimonials, opinions and conjecture I DO consider it gibberish. If you have anything to present that is actually scientific kindly do so (before getting sidetracked yet again).
I'm not the one sidetracking Z, and you know that.
Tell me, from all those long explanations I gave of the difference between the 'mind/spirit' and the brain, or a mind that you guys say is the product of the brain, where do you stand so far?
Do you consider the mind the product of the brain, or a separate being, or entity (i don't know what to identify it as that we both could relate to the same way. This is like the word gay.
We never got far on my undeniable description of the existence of 'nothing' either. You kept on saying "You have no evidence" when I shown you evidence after solid scientific evidence, and described the importance of nothing, and how it looks, feels, smells, tastes, .. everything.
Zzyzx wrote:arian wrote:
Zzyzx wrote:
arian wrote:
I am speaking science
Perhaps you THINK you are "speaking science" but those of us who know something of science disagree.
Changing the meaning of science to science fiction does not mean people can no longer observe the world around them, and have to accept only what is told to them by the science fiction writers, or them long, long time ago fairytale writers.
If you are now admitting that what you present is science fiction, I do not disagree.
OK Z, .. if you say so.
Zzyzx wrote:arian wrote:
Thanks but no thanks, I demand the old scientific proof that has both substance and scientific evidence,
Okay. Let's keep it simple. Present your "scientific" evidence that demons exist. That you saw some men and decided they were demons (or whatever) is decidedly NOT scientific by any stretch of the imagination. (Before getting sidetracked yet again).
Please see above, I'm getting tired of repeating myself Z.
Zzyzx wrote:arian wrote:
Zzyzx wrote:
arian wrote:
here revealing our Creator,
You CLAIM to have "indisputable scientific evidence of a creator" but have produced nothing more than testimonials (similar to the meteor story above).
I know, I know, ..
"no one can see the mind, so the mind doesn't exist"! So until I have some solid evidence like fossil records, or cave paintings of the mind, it remains nothing more then testimonials. And darn it, .. I didn't have the camera with me when we seen the meteor like spirit pass between us, .. how unfortunate. LOL, .. as if a video would be considered 'evidence' with all this video editing programs so readily available .. hardy-har-har arian!
Okay. You claim to have seen a meteor-like object and concluded it was a "demon" (or whatever).
Granting, for the moment, that you actually saw a "meteor-like object", kindly present evidence that it was a "demon" (or whatever you think it was).
Remember how I explained that a long time later I put it all together, what we've seen, and how right after it disappeared between us that I was overcome by extreme anger, especially at work risking me getting fired? (I don't just do things like that)
Well I read up on demons in an old Book, and it is a really good book in identifying demons/deities from Angels who are still one with God. I told you of both. I'm sure you pick up some good old books for reference too!?
Z, .. how about we get back to my
"Undeniable Scientific Evidence of our Creator", and see how much I know? I just touched the tip of the iceberg, I need people to ask me things, and if I can answer, you will surely find out if I'm just making it up, or if this actually makes sense?
This is why I appreciate being here, you guys question everything and you are smart. And believe it or not, but your questions are my questions, only I wasn't smart enough to come up with them. But answering them by searchin what educates me.
In church everyone just nods like cows, and sometime give out a grunt, or an Amen. Just try to speak out when you hear the Minister say something stupid?
Once I just couldn't help it and spurted out a; "Say what?" not even that loud, and you should of seen people stare at me! I wanted to slip down under the pews and crawl out of there.
I told you I am not schooled, so I look into almost everything we have talked about fresh. I mean this should be easy for intelligent people like yourself to see if I'm just B.S.'ing, or if I'm really making sense here, don't you agree?
Ask me something like:
"OK arian, if our mind is of God and IS Allknowing, then how come we don't know everything like God does?"
Or, .. arian, if you say God is Spirit and has no body (neither celestial or terrestrial) and you describe Him as
"The Infinite, Eternal Creative Mind "I Am Who I Am", then how did He create bodies with forms, or this physical universe? I mean it's 'so not Him'? How did He materialize His dreams, His plans when He is Eternal and Infinite and the created is finite and needs constant sustainment?
How could finite, and physical objects appear from and in the Infinite God?
Or, why do you believe that God created 'nothing' and that you believe it is a very, .. actually extremely important part of any-
thing created?
Zzyzx wrote:arian wrote:
Zzyzx wrote:
arian wrote:
yet something inside your head is telling you to get me on some serious brain damage-drugs.
That diagnosis should be left to mental health professionals.
You mean 'professionals' like the ones the 9-11 Twin Tower eye and ear witnesses were directed to?
I mean, specifically, that psychiatrists who are trained to deal with such things be the ones to make a diagnosis. (Without getting distracted yet again).
So if you were walking on the beach in California and seen some hideous unidentifiable creature wash up on shore with another head growing out of his mouth, and in agony breath his last, you would run and get a mental check up?
Zzyzx wrote:arian wrote:
Zzyzx wrote:
arian wrote:
Please tell me what differences do you see between my scientific explanation of the meteor-like smoke UFO I've seen with my own eyes and if I was detailing you on my last acid trip?
I see no difference between your totally UN-scientific "explanation" of the meteor story and your last acid trip. There may be a connection.
So 'seeing' meteor like objects flying between me and a co-worker was triggered by my mushroom experience I had years later?
"Triggered" is YOUR term, not mine. I do observe, however, that people who ingest certain mushrooms or other substances often report hallucinations. (Without getting distracted yet again).
So do you often hear of people 'trippin' before taking acid?
Zzyzx wrote:arian wrote:
Zzyzx wrote:
arian wrote:
All of a sudden when we consider Walt Disney the Biblical claim of "talking donkey" is no longer that far fetched is it?
Equating Disney characters with the biblical talking donkey seems appropriate. They are equally far fetched and detached from reality. One difference, however, is that most people beyond childhood realize that Disney characters are imaginary – but often fail to make that distinction with bible characters. Some even insist that they have personally seen "demons."
Darn it, I knew watching all them Disney cartoons will have some mental/brainwashing-effect on my kids, and from what you are telling me, it looks like the cartoons had some serious effects on me too! Wait a minute, .. it was that Winnie the Pooh character Eeyore!
Perhaps one would be well advised to consult sources other than fantasy cartoons and comic books if they are interested in presenting evidence in debate.
The Bible is off limit, real observed science is off limit, then what else is there to turn to Z? There is always Disney World right? Better than going to some dusty old museum and video their fossil collections that's for sure. Wait, .. I hope i didn't offend anyone by that remark, if so I'm sorry.