A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Exploring the details of Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
marketandchurch
Scholar
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 12:51 am
Location: The People's Republic Of Portland

A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1

Post by marketandchurch »

This was the post that got me banned on Christian Chat:
Then God doesn't care about the goodness and decency of an atheist, a buddhist, etc. And if that is the message you are telling me, then there is no point to being a good person. There is no point of fighting on behalf of the oppressed, as America did, in WWII. The only purpose of fighting the Japanese, and beating back the Nazi's should have been so that we could bring more people to christ...is that what your saying? Should America be sending food and aid to heathens in Haiti? Should America be helping out muslims in disaster relief fallowing a natural disaster, unless it is to bring them to Christ? Is a person's only value to you, there potential to become a convert? They have no humanity beyond that?

You have an old testament my_adonai, and you are to be as obsessed with its obsessions, as you are with the new testament's. And the Old Testament's preoccupation is fighting evil, championing the good, and making a more ethical existence, during this lifetime.

And unless you think Christians alone can make this lifetime a little better, a little less genocidal, with a little less starvation, a little less torture, etc, it is an unethical message to peddle, that a good God would demand goodness, unless one doesn't believe in his son. Then one's goodness is pointless. One might as well not care about not gossiping behind other people's back, destroying someone's dignity in public, sleeping with a coworker's wife, extorting an elderly couple that one was hired to help, raping a pre-pubcescent child, killing another human being because of their skin color, etc, etc, etc.

Apparently, I was challenging people's faith, and was just there to be anti-christian, in saying that a Good God would not send to hell decent people, simply because they do not believe in his Son. I got all sorts of less then appetizing replies, saying I'm screwed for eternity, if I don't accept Jesus. I feel that I am not alone, even within the Christian community, in thinking this as I've heard many catholic priests, and mainstream protestant pastors, while I was growing up, distancing themselves from such a belief. I don't know where people on this forum stand, but I'll put it up for debate:

  • Topic of Debate: A Good God would not send to hell a decent person, simply for not believing in his son.


If you agree with me, and are a Christian, please square your response with the rest of the New Testament. What I'm looking for is scriptural consistency to back up your position, and more importantly, how one will then re-read the entire message of the New Testament, if one wants to hold that position. I say this because I don't want you to drop scripture, simply because it doesn't conform to your own personal beliefs, but I am looking for how one can reinterpret the New testament, if one drops that central tenant, & for the rest of us, impediment, to everlasting life. Is there room for this? Or is the New Testament rigidly in the affirmative about Christ being the only way to heaven? Which is fine. That's their theology, but let's see where this goes.

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10036
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1223 times
Been thanked: 1621 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1141

Post by Clownboat »

onewithhim wrote:
Clownboat wrote:
JehovahsWitness wrote: [Replying to post 1122 by marco]

I would agree, everyone is entitled to their own personal view. Personally I do not believe a God of love would torture people eternally, others are quite comfortable with this view. To each their own worldview.

JEHOVAH'S WITNESS
Question for ya.
I know you said, 'to each their own', but if you are a Witness, don't you conform to 'their' (The Jehovah's Witness) world view?

Is it a persons world view that prevents them from playing organized sports, or celebrating holidays and such, or from associating with people that are not Jehovah's Witnesses themselves?

Is it your world view that would stop you from saying "Hi" to someone that has been disfellowshipped? Not even saying 'Hi' seems like an odd view IMO.
Is it your world view that tells you that Jesus was the Archangel Michael? Why did it take the Witnesses for this world view to come to light?
Is the 144,000 part of your world view, or the church?
How about your views on blood and transfusions? Are they your own?
(These may not apply to you, and if so, just say so and consider the questions retracted).
Of course, a Witness could point to the scriptures that the Watch Tower uses to justify these 'world views', but then I'm left to wonder, if they are true claims, why were they missed for so long until the Witnesses came about and got them right?

I guess I'm just trying to figure out how genuine the 'to each their own world view' claim really is by trying to gauge if you have arrived at your conclusions on your own, or if you just have the world view of the religion you follow (which is what I would expect and which would make the 'to each their own' claim quite ironic).
You and others seem to just want to castigate Jehovah'sWitness and other JWs. Jehovah'sWitness was saying that each person has the right to have his own world view. Not that he thinks it's OK to hold such a view, whatever that may be.

:study:
I'm not sure what you are on about.
I'm specifically questioning the sincerity of the 'to each their own' statement.

This is a debate site. Our words are visible and we need to be careful what we say because they can be challenged.

'To each their own' specifically coming from a JW struck me as odd. The JW that I work with does not have his own 'world view'. He has the world view of the Watch Tower and his church. I know this because whenever we discuss religion, he pulls up the Watch Tower and then gives me answers. I'm curious if this is as common as I suspect thus I inquire about the world view of the one who made the comment in the first place here. If I'm wrong in my observation, this would be a great time to correct me. If the shoe does fit, that is hardly my issue.

Where you fail is in thinking that I didn't understand that he thinks all people have the right to their own world view. This, if true, would then mean it is also true for JW himself. I want to know if he heeds his own statement or just toes the JW line.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

shushi_boi
Apprentice
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 11:18 am

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1142

Post by shushi_boi »

[Replying to post 1 by marketandchurch]

Good question, but it seems that this thread is too long at this point for me to follow every single response :P

I'm interested in hearing what responses you have come up with so far.

This question, in order to answer it completely I would assume original sin has to be brought up as to why all mankind is damned to hell. Hell in my opinion, as a annihilitionist rather than a traditionalist, I believe people like Hitler will be punished for their sins in Hell, but when Christ comes again, his second coming will entail final judgement onto his creation, which is to say that Satan, along with his angels, demons, and Hell that has fallen spirits will be annihilated in this second death, the lake of fire.

But going back to the topic of decent atheists or unbelievers of Christ being sent to Hell, I think is fallacious in the Christian doctrine as Christianity teaches that no man through their own fruits or efforts can achieve salvation (If we are to be fair and just, if we measure every man's good deeds and bad deeds, no one can clear up their bad deeds and then remain perfect in order to obtain salvation through their own efforts). No man, since the fall of Adam and Eve can obtain salvation without Christ as Christ payed that ticket. Believing in Christ not only allows you to use his sacrifice, his life as a free pass to heaven, but following his teachings, you will be in a process to be changed to perfection which is the Christian teaching of Salvation. No longer does mankind have to fight the flesh between each other in wars, we have to live lives of pacifism, lives where we turn the other cheek instead of an eye for an eye, where Sin through Christ is obliterated, and mankind can live through peace.

I guess in order to receive the full grasp of understanding of this Theology, you would have to understand the seriousness of Sin. You would have to also not assume that God owes us salvation, eternal life instead of eternal death. God doesn't owe us anything which is a key idea behind this theology as well.

Here are 3 different views of Hell and salvation that are debated in this interesting video;

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 11093
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1574 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1143

Post by onewithhim »

shushi_boi wrote: [Replying to post 1 by marketandchurch]

Good question, but it seems that this thread is too long at this point for me to follow every single response :P

I'm interested in hearing what responses you have come up with so far.

This question, in order to answer it completely I would assume original sin has to be brought up as to why all mankind is damned to hell. Hell in my opinion, as a annihilitionist rather than a traditionalist, I believe people like Hitler will be punished for their sins in Hell, but when Christ comes again, his second coming will entail final judgement onto his creation, which is to say that Satan, along with his angels, demons, and Hell that has fallen spirits will be annihilated in this second death, the lake of fire.

But going back to the topic of decent atheists or unbelievers of Christ being sent to Hell, I think is fallacious in the Christian doctrine as Christianity teaches that no man through their own fruits or efforts can achieve salvation (If we are to be fair and just, if we measure every man's good deeds and bad deeds, no one can clear up their bad deeds and then remain perfect in order to obtain salvation through their own efforts). No man, since the fall of Adam and Eve can obtain salvation without Christ as Christ payed that ticket. Believing in Christ not only allows you to use his sacrifice, his life as a free pass to heaven, but following his teachings, you will be in a process to be changed to perfection which is the Christian teaching of Salvation. No longer does mankind have to fight the flesh between each other in wars, we have to live lives of pacifism, lives where we turn the other cheek instead of an eye for an eye, where Sin through Christ is obliterated, and mankind can live through peace.

I guess in order to receive the full grasp of understanding of this Theology, you would have to understand the seriousness of Sin. You would have to also not assume that God owes us salvation, eternal life instead of eternal death. God doesn't owe us anything which is a key idea behind this theology as well.

Here are 3 different views of Hell and salvation that are debated in this interesting video;
I hope you do go back and read at least some of the posts on this subject. It has been quite thoroughly discussed. I brought up the fact that three different words have been translated into "hell," by translators since at least 1610. These three words each mean something different, yet they are all rendered in English as "hell." This has made the subject of hell so confusing that people don't know what it really is.

The three Greek words that mean something different:

HADES: means THE GRAVE

GEHENNA: means annihilation

TARTARUS: means a state of being in spiritual darkness

One would have to go to an Interlinear Bible to see where these words come up, and therefore be able to distinguish what the real meaning is of what is being said. A source that explains alot about these things is www.jw.org . Type "hell" into the top right corner and the information will be accessible.


:study:

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10036
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1223 times
Been thanked: 1621 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1144

Post by Clownboat »

onewithhim wrote:This has made the subject of hell so confusing that people don't know what it really is.
Do you acknowledge that you are one of these people?

I ask, because we all know that details about a 'hell' cannot be known in this life. Yet you have made statements about hell in this thread as if you have some special knowledge that escapes Christians that don't think like you or follow your specific dogma. You then point to a very specific type of dogma (JW.org) as if we should consider it an authority on a subject that cannot be known.

Do you admit that we (yourself included) don't know the details about a hell nor if a hell is even real? People can believe by faith in anything they want, so I'm not asking you this and hoping you will answer from your faith, nor provide the opinions of your specific dogmas. I just want to be clear that you are like the rest of us on this matter, or if you consider yourself to be different on this unknown subject.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

User avatar
ttruscott
Site Supporter
Posts: 11064
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:09 pm
Location: West Coast of Canada
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1145

Post by ttruscott »

onewithhim wrote: These three words each mean something different, yet they are all rendered in English as "hell." This has made the subject of hell so confusing that people don't know what it really is.

The three Greek words that mean something different:

HADES: means THE GRAVE
HADES: Strong's Greek Lexicon Search Results
Result of search for "hades":
86. haides hah'-dace from 1 (as negative particle) and 1492; properly, unseen, i.e. "Hades" or the place (state) of departed souls:--grave, hell.
GEHENNA: means annihilation
GEHENNA: Strong's G1067
Strong’s Definitions
γέεννα géenna, gheh'-en-nah; of Hebrew origin (H1516 and H2011); valley of (the son of) Hinnom; ge-henna (or Ge-Hinnom), a valley of Jerusalem, used (figuratively) as a name for the place (or state) of everlasting punishment:—hell.

Your insistence it means annihilation is not supported by all Christian scholars, eh?
TARTARUS: means a state of being in spiritual darkness
TARTARUS
Outline of Biblical Usage
the name of the subterranean region, doleful and dark, regarded by the ancient Greeks as the abode of the wicked dead, where they suffer punishment for their evil deeds; it answers to Gehenna of the Jews

Strong’s Definitions
τα�τα�όω tartaró�, tar-tar-o'-o; from Τά�τα�ος Tártaros (the deepest abyss of Hades); to incarcerate in eternal torment:—cast down to hell.

These words an all refer properly to the waiting place of the dead, waiting for the resurrection. Even hell can be used this way and not just for the final place of judgment: From the ONLINE ETYMOLOGY DICTIONARY [http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=hell] we have hell (n.)
also Hell, Old English hel, helle, "nether world, abode of the dead, infernal regions, place of torment for the wicked after death," from Proto-Germanic *haljo "the underworld" (cognates: Old Frisian helle, Old Saxon hellia, Dutch hel, Old Norse hel, German Hölle, Gothic halja "hell"). Literally "concealed place" (compare Old Norse hellir "cave, cavern"), from PIE *kel- (2) "to cover, conceal"

Your CHOICE of interpretation is in dispute, not the interlinear bible's. A quick look at www.jw.org shows it will only provide your sects narrow interpretation and not the full range of possibilities open to our perusal.
PCE Theology as I see it...

We had an existence with a free will in Sheol before the creation of the physical universe. Here we chose to be able to become holy or to be eternally evil in YHWH's sight. Then the physical universe was created and all sinners were sent to earth.

This theology debunks the need to base Christianity upon the blasphemy of creating us in Adam's sin.

Logicaloutreach
Student
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:30 pm

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1146

Post by Logicaloutreach »

[Replying to marketandchurch]

A good God would not send a decent atheist to hell. Is a contradiction in it self. The fact that you said "atheist" tells it all. That word atheist means you reject him as God!!!!! Which means you reject his throne!!! That is a criminal act the king going to reject you from his kingdom!!! There is a global quarantine coming if you refuse the antidote (Jesus Christ). You will be quaratined (hell).

Murder, rebellion, hate, wars, racism everything is going to stop. Heaven is for those who join the fight against evil be taking alliance with Gods son!!!! Reject him he will reject you.

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10036
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1223 times
Been thanked: 1621 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1147

Post by Clownboat »

Logicaloutreach wrote: [Replying to marketandchurch]

A good God would not send a decent atheist to hell. Is a contradiction in it self. The fact that you said "atheist" tells it all. That word atheist means you reject him as God!!!!! Which means you reject his throne!!! That is a criminal act the king going to reject you from his kingdom!!! There is a global quarantine coming if you refuse the antidote (Jesus Christ). You will be quaratined (hell).

Murder, rebellion, hate, wars, racism everything is going to stop. Heaven is for those who join the fight against evil be taking alliance with Gods son!!!! Reject him he will reject you.
You should leave scare tactics to ISIS.
This scaring into belief works well on many children, but you are speaking to adults here and presenting good arguments for your case will go a lot further than this full of fear response. If you are terrified of a hell, argue for it, but don't project your fear on to others. Perhaps one day you will be set free from your fears and look back at what you are terrified of and feel foolish.

It would also serve you well if you looked up the definition of atheist. An atheist is not someone that rejects a god. And especially they are not people that reject just your favorite god concept.
An atheist is without theism. No rejection is required.

Welcome to the forum.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

shushi_boi
Apprentice
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 11:18 am

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1148

Post by shushi_boi »

[Replying to post 1141 by Clownboat]

I would like to differ with you on that point. Atheism is not a psychological state of mind "lacking any knowledge of god", atheism in fact in the literal sense is without god, meaning the rejection of God. You can prove negatives but in the case of atheism, it is just as equal being an atheist like it is being theist. The area where one one would not know whether a god exists or not, but is open to the question is an agnostic, I just wanted to correct you on that point.

User avatar
marco
Savant
Posts: 12314
Joined: Sun Dec 20, 2015 3:15 pm
Location: Scotland
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1149

Post by marco »

Erexsaur wrote:

Biblical mention of the animals discussed was the use of them as models to describe the peace that would supernaturally return to the earth when the sins of mankind are dealt with and done away with. Dangerous animals are so because of the presence of man's sinful nature.
You say tomAYto and I say tomAto. It would be better if you prefixed "Dangerous animals are so because of the presence of man's sinful nature" with "in my view" or some such modifier. I don't have this view and don't think I ever will.
Erexsaur wrote:
We must beware of the danger of missing out on vital Biblical messages meant for us personally because of distraction from side issues not yet fully understood. Use of the high school algebra approach of letting "x" equal to the meaning of troublesome scriptures is a way to keep them from distracting us.
Given my level of sophistication is unequal to the challenge of the esoteric interpretations you give, I think there is every danger that, if traps have been set, marco will stumble into them.

You have lost me with your example of allocating to the variable x some value that doesn't have much meaning for me. I am a simple mathematician.

You've done your best with this poor student, Erexsaur, but he's none the wiser.

My best wishes.

User avatar
onewithhim
Savant
Posts: 11093
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 7:56 pm
Location: Norwich, CT
Has thanked: 1574 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: A Good God would not send a decent Atheist to hell.

Post #1150

Post by onewithhim »

Clownboat wrote:
onewithhim wrote:This has made the subject of hell so confusing that people don't know what it really is.
Do you acknowledge that you are one of these people?

I ask, because we all know that details about a 'hell' cannot be known in this life. Yet you have made statements about hell in this thread as if you have some special knowledge that escapes Christians that don't think like you or follow your specific dogma. You then point to a very specific type of dogma (JW.org) as if we should consider it an authority on a subject that cannot be known.

Do you admit that we (yourself included) don't know the details about a hell nor if a hell is even real? People can believe by faith in anything they want, so I'm not asking you this and hoping you will answer from your faith, nor provide the opinions of your specific dogmas. I just want to be clear that you are like the rest of us on this matter, or if you consider yourself to be different on this unknown subject.
No, I am not one of the people who propagate false ideas about "hell" and cause people to be confused. We CAN know about hell in this life. The number one thing we can know is that it doesn't exist as a place of fiery torture & agony. If you really want to know what the reasonable, logical, and sound reasons are to reject a literal hell-fire, then you would gain a lot by going to www.jw.org .

I would be lying if I said that we can't know about hell. You stick with your church's dogma and I'll stick with what I know from extensive research.

:study:

Post Reply