Cathar1950 wrote:There were many sects and diverse interpretations in second temple Judaism. The Essenes used and allegorical method of reading the Hebrew writings.
True but it doesn't invlaidate my argument. WE can't dismiss Mat as stupid or unjewish just because we can't see how he comes some fo the conclusions to which he comes.
So Matthew was using only one of many ways Jews and Rabbis Were looking at the OT. He also used some pagan ideas as he tried to reshape Mark's story and create a New Moses for the fledgling Christians in Diaspora.
Most second temple Jews has some pagan ideas. The idea of hell and of heaven as a reward for the faithful came form paganism.
If Jesus fulfilled any Prophesies it was because the used the OT to create the fiction of his life and ministry as an apologetic in the form of Greek hero stories followers/disciples and all.
Jesus doesn't fit any Greek hero stories. Most of those were totally uninfluential in Palestine and all that Jesus fits is in the OT. Mat is very Essene in his understanding, not a much as John however, The Mat community probalby has early Pharisaeical converts.
Luke did he rewrite of mark too. The gospels can't even get the disciples straight.
redaction is not a re-write. That's way over simplsitic.
Then we can see where gospel was changed to agree with gospel. As other ideas came in conflict changes were made to fight the proto-orthodox Christian competitions. The Dead Sea Scrolls show the use of Allegory when they read the scriptures and attributed passages to their Teacher of Righteousness. There is not much unique about the Christians use of scripture except its modern day misinterpretations asserted as historical facts.
I believe the core group of the infant chruch were Essnes. I believe Jesus famiily itself was the leadership fo the Essene movement. They may not have had acutal ties to Qumran but they were clealry in the think of the overall cultural movement to spawned Qumran.