polonius.advice wrote:
QUESTION: Does this mean that men with long hair can be identified as sinners, but women with long hair cannot?
Never said that it meant sinner - sinner is a different concept.
It is an natural sign of continuing in thy guilt, see
Psalm 68:21
That plus
1 Corinthians 11:14-15, and it started back after Adam and Eve first sinned,
Genesis 3:21
The hair does not show sin - it is a sign of continual guilt - and lots of hair (on a man) means more guilt while less means less guilt.
We really do not know the truth if Jesus had long hair or not.
Since Jesus was sinless and guiltless then we could expect that Jesus had short hair or even bald, but it could be that Jesus is said to have carried the guilt, He was the innocent dying for the guilty, and so in that view Jesus might have had lots of hair.
polonius.advice wrote:
I find it difficult to take such arguments seriously.
It is an odd thing but with research it does come out true.
As like male prisoners in jail will often cut off all of their hair to a
crew cut, and then clean shave, and it is because their continuing guilt was stopped by getting incarcerated.
The females in jail will often let their hair grow out, and they will say it is because they can not get it cut just right in jail, and if they do cut it as soon as they get released then they surely intend to go right back to their old crimes.
It is said to be an animal things as being natural or being above the carnal nature.