We KNOW their is no tooth fairy.
Would any one waste their time talking with people who did believe it?
No. For what reason? But atheists do this. Why? They are convinced their is no God. So they say. However if that was true then what are they doing here?
There is no such thing as a person who truly, without a doubt believes there is no God. There is always some doubt. And to find out you have to die.
There are really only one reason for the faithless or Godless to be here.
To accuse people of being wrong knowing they can't prove God exists. And I think atheists iare mad at God for not being able to prove he doesn't exist. I think they refuse to believe in God because they are afraid they would have to prove it and they wouldn't be able to. And the thought of losing an argument or not being able to defend it is too much for them. So they just deny God rather than look foolish. They have big egos. They have to be right. Probably have control issues in relationships
Why do atheists participate in religious discussions?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 3:29 pm
Re: Why do atheists participate in religious discussions?
Post #111On naturalism, evil is entirely subjective...and not really worthy of discussion.Danmark wrote:
That one is SO easy to refute.
A. nuclear bombs themselves are not evil.
B. There are much better examples of evil in the world which Christians claim their god created:
The flood
cancer
rattlesnakes
poison
opium (actually a good thing, but if you wanna call it evil, god did it..
muscular dystrophy
birth defects
the list goes on and on and includes man's nature which is just like god's and includes destroying things he doesn't like.
Your god is an evil god and a liar because 'he' claims to be good.
The only thing that makes sense is, "There is no god."
'He' is an anthropomorphic invention, an actual and logical impossibility.
- Danmark
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 12697
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:58 am
- Location: Seattle
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #112
Why do people who were once Christians participate in religious discussions?
One reason is because we see the utter foolishness, the lies, the hurt that these false beliefs cause others and we want to save people from those false religious beliefs.
I'm watching "Boy Erased" https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7008872/ based on a true story about one of these cruel, misinformed conversion 'pray away the gay' crackpot programs. I see the cruelty that false beliefs can put people through. I'd like to spare others that kind of nonsense. Recently we've had a Muslim on this forum go on and on about why science is 'foolish' when it contradicts 'scripture.' This is sad. The mind gets actually warped by a denial of truth, of reality. One is truly lost when one has been taught to accept a lie.
One might just as easily ask, why do Christians participate in discussions about atheism or anti religious discussion groups? Perhaps they secretly want to be rescued from their false beliefs and embrace reality.
One reason is because we see the utter foolishness, the lies, the hurt that these false beliefs cause others and we want to save people from those false religious beliefs.
I'm watching "Boy Erased" https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7008872/ based on a true story about one of these cruel, misinformed conversion 'pray away the gay' crackpot programs. I see the cruelty that false beliefs can put people through. I'd like to spare others that kind of nonsense. Recently we've had a Muslim on this forum go on and on about why science is 'foolish' when it contradicts 'scripture.' This is sad. The mind gets actually warped by a denial of truth, of reality. One is truly lost when one has been taught to accept a lie.
One might just as easily ask, why do Christians participate in discussions about atheism or anti religious discussion groups? Perhaps they secretly want to be rescued from their false beliefs and embrace reality.
-
- Savant
- Posts: 9866
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
- Location: Planet Earth
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Re: Why do atheists participate in religious discussions?
Post #113I have a few suggestions, 1) present a counter-argument, 2) concede or 3) keep your commentraies to yourself.For_The_Kingdom wrote: So, when you say something that I shake my head about or laugh out loud about, what should I do?
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 3:29 pm
Re: Why do atheists participate in religious discussions?
Post #114You of all people should know that #1 is always delivered; service with a smile.Bust Nak wrote:I have a few suggestions, 1) present a counter-argument, 2) concede or 3) keep your commentraies to yourself.For_The_Kingdom wrote: So, when you say something that I shake my head about or laugh out loud about, what should I do?
# 2, as needed.
#3...well.
-
- Savant
- Posts: 9866
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
- Location: Planet Earth
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Re: Why do atheists participate in religious discussions?
Post #115I have no idea where you get the nerve from for such claims. Smiles sure, counter-arguments, not so much. While we are here, how about starting that problem of evil thread that I asked for?For_The_Kingdom wrote: You of all people should know that #1 is always delivered; service with a smile.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1915
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 3:29 pm
Re: Why do atheists participate in religious discussions?
Post #116A lion doesn't concern itself with the opinion of sheep.Bust Nak wrote: I have no idea where you get the nerve from for such claims.
Smiles sure, counter-arguments not so much.
You kick it off, since you are arguing the affirmative.While we are here, how about starting that problem of evil thread that I asked for?
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2148 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Re: Why do atheists participate in religious discussions?
Post #117A flim fam man doesn't concern itself with the rubes it is cheating.
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
-
- Savant
- Posts: 9866
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:03 am
- Location: Planet Earth
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 266 times
Re: Why do atheists participate in religious discussions?
Post #118Which is why facts are so important.For_The_Kingdom wrote: A lion doesn't concern itself with the opinion of sheep.
Pretty sure it was you who issued the challenge.You kick it off, since you are arguing the affirmative.
- Diagoras
- Guru
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2019 12:47 am
- Has thanked: 170 times
- Been thanked: 579 times
Re: Why do atheists participate in religious discussions?
Post #119Yes it was. Post 98 on page 10, in fact. But declined in post 99. Maybe a differently worded question for debate would help?Bust Nak wrote:Pretty sure it was you who issued the challenge.You kick it off, since you are arguing the affirmative.
- bluegreenearth
- Guru
- Posts: 1917
- Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2019 4:06 pm
- Location: Manassas, VA
- Has thanked: 681 times
- Been thanked: 470 times
Re: Why do atheists participate in religious discussions?
Post #120On theism, evil is entirely subjective... and not really worthy of discussion:For_The_Kingdom wrote:
On naturalism, evil is entirely subjective...and not really worthy of discussion.
Evil is entirely subjective even in a theistic model of morality because the distinction between right and wrong behaviors would be "subject" to a god's interpretation. Therefore, moral actions are either subjective to humanity's arbitrary interpretations or subjective to a god's arbitrary declarations.
I can already hear William Lane Craig retorting, "God doesn't arbitrarily decide what behaviors are moral because morality is part of God's nature!" Well, if that's the case, morality would be objective but beyond God's power to control. Otherwise, morality would be subjective if God had the power to control the morality inherent to his nature in such a way that he could arbitrarily define its properties. So, if you are convinced that morality is objective and grounded in God's nature, then you believe in a God with limited power. Unfortunately, though, this depiction of God contradicts your theology.
In any case, what function would objective morality serve in the nature of a monotheistic creator god? Prior to creating humanity (and angels if you believe such things exist), God had only himself to interact with. What objectively immoral action could an indestructible and omnipotent God have done to himself when he was all by his lonesome that was prevented by the objective morality inherent to his nature? Did his objective moral nature discourage God from masturbating or participating in anal sex with himself? Obviously, the concept of a monotheistic creator god with an objectively moral nature is logically incoherent.
It seems the only way an objective morality could exist would be for it to function like a law of physics. For example, the "Law of Gravity" functions the same way on all objects in the universe independent of whether humans exist or not. If humanity were to suddenly disappear from the universe, gravity would still exist because the Law of Gravity is objective. Meanwhile, since morality is inextricably linked to human behavior, it cannot exist without humans. If morality objectively exists in the universe in the same way as gravity, how does it function on non-human objects? Is there a yet to be discovered moral quantum particle that objectively exists, interacts with every object in the universe, but manifests in humanity as an emergent property called human morality? If so, human morality would still be subject to the existence of humans even if it were an emergent property of moral quantum particles that objectively exist.
Good and evil are things we must work together to define for ourselves as a species. God (if he exists) is welcome to offer his recommendations, but only we can decide how we prefer to be treated. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Better yet, do unto others in accordance with how they prefer you do unto them. Not everyone wants to be treated the same way as you would have them treat you. Can I get an Amen!