The Golden Rule's problems

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Willum
Savant
Posts: 9017
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 2:14 pm
Location: Yahweh's Burial Place
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 82 times

The Golden Rule's problems

Post #1

Post by Willum »

The Golden Rule, has its first known origins with the Goddess Ma'at and a story about unlawful claiming of property.
It was either taken from there, or rediscovered by Thales of Greece in about 500 BCE.

It is recapped in the Bible in Matthew 7:12,
Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you: Do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets
Or in the OT, Leviticus 19:18
You shall not take vengeance or bear a grudge against the sons of your own people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the Lord.
It sounds great on the surface, but is it the ultimate slippery slope for morality?

The key to recognize the problem is that we all think we are good.
The serial killers of the worlds, the rapist, the you name its of villainy are aware of and can probably justify their actions with the Golden Rule.

Premise of the topic: The Golden Rule sets every single individual as a standard for morality, and appeals to vanity to delude us into its being correct.
It seems like a recipe for disaster if you ask me.

Bad people will do bad things, because their personal version of the rule, allows it. They would say to themselves, "If I were this given person [whom I am doing bad things to], I would expect this kind of treatment from me."

So the topic of debate is obvious, is the Golden Rule the metric for behavior that it is employed as?

benchwarmer
Prodigy
Posts: 2510
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:40 am
Has thanked: 2338 times
Been thanked: 961 times

Post #81

Post by benchwarmer »

1213 wrote:
benchwarmer wrote:...So you are for it then since you follow the Bible
Because I dont want to be a slave, I dont want to keep anyone my slave.
Awesome! However, you are still not directly answering the topic at hand. You personally don't want to be a slave, but you're fine with the Bible laying out rules for buying and how to treat slaves. The mind boggles that you don't see the issue here.

By your logic, only people who want to be a slave themselves should be buying slaves, which of course makes no sense.

1213 wrote:
benchwarmer wrote:Where do you live? If not in Canada then I am free to buy you
Are you saying Canadiens sell their people? It can be difficult to buy, if no one is selling, which is not allowed in the Bible.
No, I'm not saying that. I'm saying I live in Canada, thus if you don't live here then I can buy you.

What's not allowed in the Bible? Selling people? You are making no sense.
1213 wrote:
benchwarmer wrote:You think it's better for people to be sold?! You would have had a better life if your parents sold you into slavery?
If my parents would be that evil that they would sell me, I would be clad to go to Jewish buyer.
You say this sitting comfortably in your home, free to do as you please, but I highly doubt you would really want to be a slave regardless of how 'evil' your parents are. You are assuming the people who buy you are not evil. Remember they can beat you as long as you don't die within 2 days. Sounds like fun.

User avatar
Willum
Savant
Posts: 9017
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 2:14 pm
Location: Yahweh's Burial Place
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Post #82

Post by Willum »

1213 wrote:
Willum wrote: Weird why would the son of a Jealous God ask that a different god be given tithes?
I think you have really weird interpretation. Why it is necessary for you even though there is no support in the Bible for your interpretation?
No support in the Bible for my "interpretation!!!??"

Are you unfamiliar with the Commandments:
Thou shalt have no gods before me?
In his very speech, Jesus put the god Caesar before the god God!
Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image?
The coins Jesus asked the nation to pay were graven images of proclaimed deities. Deities whose only form of worship was the tax or tithe they claimed.

No support in the Bible for my "interpretation!!!??"
Did not the patriarchs of Jerusalem have Jesus killed for blasphemy? Is that not support?

I mean really!

User avatar
1213
Savant
Posts: 13237
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:06 am
Location: Finland
Has thanked: 473 times
Been thanked: 504 times

Post #83

Post by 1213 »

benchwarmer wrote:By your logic, only people who want to be a slave themselves should be buying slaves, which of course makes no sense.
Not exactly. If I would live in nation that sells own people, I would hope a righteous Jew would buy me out of that nation that sells own people. So, people who would like to be bought from nation that sells own people, could also buy people from nations that sell own people. Luckily I dont think we anymore have nations that sell own people, or do we?
benchwarmer wrote:What's not allowed in the Bible? Selling people? You are making no sense.

Anyone who kidnaps someone and sells him, or if he is found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death.

Ex. 21:16

For they are my servants, whom I brought forth out of the land of Egypt. They shall not be sold as slaves.
Lev. 25:42

So, they were allowed to buy, but not to sell. And I think that is the important thing. If other nations sell own people, I think they are bad and in that case I think it is ok, if Jews then are allowed to buy.
benchwarmer wrote:You say this sitting comfortably in your home, free to do as you please, but I highly doubt you would really want to be a slave regardless of how 'evil' your parents are. You are assuming the people who buy you are not evil. Remember they can beat you as long as you don't die within 2 days. Sounds like fun.
If a righteous Jew would buy, I think it would be better. Why would owner beat his slave? If the slave dies, the owner deserves death and if the slave dont die, but cant work, he is not useful. It is simply not reasonable to beat own slave, similarly as it is not reasonable to hit yourself. It is sad, if you think it is fun to hit people.

Also, there is these rules:

If a man strikes his servant's eye, or his maid's eye, and destroys it, he shall let him go free for his eye's sake. If he strikes out his man-servant's tooth, or his maid-servant's tooth, he shall let him go free for his tooth's sake.
Ex. 21:26-27

And there is still the rule, love your neighbor as yourself, which unfortunately seems to be for many too difficult to understand.
My new book can be read freely from here:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rIkqxC ... xtqFY/view

Old version can be read from here:
http://web.archive.org/web/202212010403 ... x_eng.html

User avatar
Tcg
Savant
Posts: 8673
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
Location: Third Stone
Has thanked: 2260 times
Been thanked: 2380 times

Post #84

Post by Tcg »

1213 wrote:
And there is still the rule, love your neighbor as yourself, which unfortunately seems to be for many too difficult to understand.
It was clearly very hard for the authors of the Old Testament to understand. Either that, or as we have seen time and time again, when those authors spoke of neighbors, it was limited to the Israelites. Non-Israelites were treated very differently.


Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.

- American Atheists


Not believing isn't the same as believing not.

- wiploc


I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.

- Irvin D. Yalom

Post Reply