Hardcore PROOF That Jesus Is Nothing But a Retold Tale: ~~~~

[astounding]

These video's are based nothing but on facts which you'll find yourself
if you do research.

START BY WATCHING THIS VIDEO: (You gotta download it)
=======================================




The God Who Wasn't There


The movie that has been astounding audiences in theaters around the world is now available on a high-quality, feature-packed DVD.

In this provocative, critically acclaimed documentary, you will discover:

* The early founders of Christianity seem wholly unaware of the idea of a human Jesus

* The Jesus of the Gospels bears a striking resemblance to other ancient heroes and the figureheads of pagan savior cults

* Contemporary Christians are largely ignorant of the origins of their religion

* Fundamentalism is as strong today as it ever has been, with an alarming 44% of Americans believing Jesus will return to earth in their lifetimes

Dazzling motion graphics and a sweeping soundtrack propel this uncompromising and taboo-shattering documentary that Newsweek says "irreverently lays out the case that Jesus Christ never existed."

The God Who Wasn't There includes provocative interviews with:

* Sam Harris, PEN Award-winning author of The End of Faith

* Robert M. Price, Jesus Seminar fellow and author of The Incredible Shrinking Son of Man

* Alan Dundes, Professor of Folklore at the University of California at Berkeley

* Richard Carrier, historian and author of Sense and Goodness Without God

Code: Select all

http://rapidshare.de/files/28138323/The_God_Who_Wasn_t_There.part1.rar.html
http://rapidshare.de/files/28142834/The_God_Who_Wasn_t_There.part2.rar.html
http://rapidshare.de/files/28147624/The_God_Who_Wasn_t_There.part3.rar.html
http://rapidshare.de/files/28151701/The_God_Who_Wasn_t_There.part4.rar.html
http://rapidshare.de/files/28155817/The_God_Who_Wasn_t_There.part5.rar.html
http://rapidshare.de/files/28160146/The_God_Who_Wasn_t_There.part6.rar.html
http://rapidshare.de/files/28134516/The_God_Who_Wasn_t_There.part7.rar.html

PASSWORD IS: www.docs4you.qfhs.org/forum



THEN GO ONTO WATHCING THIS PART WITH UNDISPUTABLE PROOF
THAT JESUS, THE BIBLE AND ALL OTHER RELIGIONS ARE NOTHNIG
BUT RETOLD TALES FROM THOUSANDS OF YEARS BEFORE THEM:
=============================================


Go to http://www.youtube.com

In the search box, type in: The Truth About The Jesus Myth


There are 6 parts in total.

Start from #1 obviously then progress onto other parts.


-A

[Lotan]

Maybe they're basing "Lamb of God" from more sources than one.

Example:

5 sources state: Ocean or peace
20 sources state: Lamb of God


So they choose the 20 sources one.

That would be a good example if it were actually true. What do you expect to prove by simply inventing the 'evidence' that suits you?

[astounding]

Lotan that's a great point.

And I never even realized it until you just mentioned it.

Strong believers in something will always invent evidence in order
to justify and provide more proof for what they already believe.

-A

[achilles12604]

You never know achilles12604,

Maybe they're basing "Lamb of God" from more sources than one.

Example:

5 sources state: Ocean or peace
20 sources state: Lamb of God


So they choose the 20 sources one.

-A

Google it. You tell me which has more sources.

[astounding]

On wikipadia.org, its:

Dalami: Ocean
Lama: Teacher or Guru

I'll continue my search...

[melikio]

I have been a DEEP "believer", and a true "skeptic" (both); I've had the reasons and evidence of others, and my own (my views combined with evidence and truth).

I've had close friends who were once devout "Christians", become strong atheists and skeptics; I've known more than a few who were atheists become "Christians". More than an few of those people will claim that they DO possess something in their mental arsenals, which justifies their personal and/or philosophical views.

And yes, people WILL believe what they are capable of believing (or simply wish to believe); also many people WILL often BLOCK evidence and truth that threatens to weaken their own views and conclusions. The basic concept of closed or open-mindedness, is all it takes to see why barriers to learning and understanding are often invented and erected.

Example: There are many WOMEN (and a significant number of MEN), who stay in very negative relationships, despite what they've learned themselves or been told by others. They know truth indeed, but the very "real" conclusions or choices they make are as unique as the individual person.

So, what I have found is that while there are many who may be unbelievers, skeptics and believers, the people I think are in the most fortunate positions, are those who do have an open mind.

I think this way, because those who are capable and willing of being open-minded, will often tend to move toward what is "real". They may not wear the label that some or many may approve of or be comfortable with, but they do tend to be reasonable. They may not agree with all they hear from someone who thinks they are "right", but they are often willing to find out that which is right/true.

While I admit my bias is toward "believing" what I think the Bible teaches, I do understand that I surely don't KNOW all things, and probably don't know anthing as well as I tend to believe. Even so, I realize that I am very interested in learning more of what certainly could be "true".

I'd definitely rather hang out with an unbeliever who is reasonable, than a believer who believes that he/she "knows", trumps any/every bit of evidence they might ever encounter.

-Mel-

[astounding]

Good points Mel.

Especially on open-mindeness.

Believers who will consciously reject possible evidence or proof which goes
against what they believe are OBVIOUSLY CLOSED MINDED.

But then again there's no point in saying that becuase closed minded
people will even reject the above phrase.

It seems to me (through experience of reality) that the only thing that
can convert a closed minded person into a open minded person is their own TIME!

[Cephus]

Nor, do I think it the film 'proves' anything. The only thing you can really say is that there isn't any current evidence FOR a historical Jesus. That lack certainly lets con men prey on those who need that evidence.

As opposed to all the con men that prey on the religious, you mean?

[Goat]

Nor, do I think it the film 'proves' anything. The only thing you can really say is that there isn't any current evidence FOR a historical Jesus. That lack certainly lets con men prey on those who need that evidence.

As opposed to all the con men that prey on the religious, you mean?

That is correct.

[Cephus]

Nor, do I think it the film 'proves' anything. The only thing you can really say is that there isn't any current evidence FOR a historical Jesus. That lack certainly lets con men prey on those who need that evidence.

As opposed to all the con men that prey on the religious, you mean?

That is correct.

So because we acknowledge that there are con men on both sides, we should bypass them entirely and go only with what the evidence supports. And guess which side the evidence comes down on?

Theists lose.

[Goat]

Nor, do I think it the film 'proves' anything. The only thing you can really say is that there isn't any current evidence FOR a historical Jesus. That lack certainly lets con men prey on those who need that evidence.

As opposed to all the con men that prey on the religious, you mean?

That is correct.

So because we acknowledge that there are con men on both sides, we should bypass them entirely and go only with what the evidence supports. And guess which side the evidence comes down on?

Theists lose.

You see, not really. It all depends on if you insist on 'evidence' for a matter of faith.