Has the claim of "Seven eyewitness accounts" been

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Has the claim of "Seven eyewitness accounts" been convincingly substantiated?

yes
0
No votes
No
14
100%
Other (explain)
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 14

Zzyzx
Site Supporter
Posts: 25141
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:38 pm
Location: Bible Belt USA
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Has the claim of "Seven eyewitness accounts" been

Post #1

Post by Zzyzx »

.
Has the claim of "Seven eyewitness accounts" been convincingly substantiated?

One of the members has repeatedly referred to his research as demonstrating that there are seven accounts by eyewitnesses to the proposed empty tomb.

Has he demonstrated to your satisfaction that:

1) The accounts are actually from eyewitnesses?

2) The stories about eyewitness accounts are true and accurate?

3) His proposals are taken seriously by scholars and theologians (or debaters on various websites)?

4) There was a tomb and it was empty?
.
Non-Theist

ANY of the thousands of "gods" proposed, imagined, worshiped, loved, feared, and/or fought over by humans MAY exist -- awaiting verifiable evidence

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2576 times

Post #38

Post by JoeyKnothead »

From Post 36:
Korah wrote: ...
that I clearly stated my division of "Q" into at least two parts by DIFFERENT AUTHORS
Until you present this "Q" source for analysis, all we can reasonably conclude is that you're dividing by zero.

Do you wanna destroy the universe? 'Cause that's how you destroy the universe.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

Korah
Under Suspension
Posts: 706
Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:16 pm
Location: Dixon, CA

Post #39

Post by Korah »

[Replying to post 37 by JoeyKnothead]
Joey, I did this in Post #4 and 5 here:
http://www.christianforums.com/threads/ ... s.7594923/
Well, yes, it's all very difficult. If it were easy, so one else would have figured it out long ago.
Sure, I'm uncertain at places. Shouldn't I be? It's not rocket science, but no one else has the answers better than I do, that's all I'm saying.

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2576 times

Post #40

Post by JoeyKnothead »

From Post 38:
Korah wrote: Joey, I did this in Post #4 and 5 here:
http://www.christianforums.com/threads/ ... s.7594923/
Please point to the specific parts of those posts that are the actual, non-hypothesised "Q" source.
Korah wrote: Well, yes, it's all very difficult. If it were easy, so one else would have figured it out long ago.
Sure, I'm uncertain at places. Shouldn't I be? It's not rocket science, but no one else has the answers better than I do, that's all I'm saying.
I dare say, if one had this "Q" source, it'd be easy just to present it.

Unless they ain't got it, then we set to understand why this is so "difficult".
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

goodwithoutgod
Scholar
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 4:47 pm
Location: Virginia

Post #41

Post by goodwithoutgod »

[Replying to Korah]

This isn't my primary site, and yes, I am a bit busy between finishing my third degree and being a full time military officer with a wife and 4 kids.....but everyone has lives yes? So what was it you wanted me to discuss?

My position is NO ONE who has ever written of jesus, knew him. The synoptic gospels were not written when or by whom as per christian tradition. Both of these facts are widely accepted by the vast majority of christian scholars and biblical historians, including myself. What was you point again? I guess I should reread this thread since it has been awhile.

Post Reply