Non-believers to BURN IN HELL!

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

Non-believers to BURN IN HELL!

Post #1

Post by JoeyKnothead »

Some'll say that if you reject Bible tales, you'll burn in Hell.

For debate:
Please offer some means to confirm the veracity of the claim.

If the claim can't be shown to be true and factual, is it uncivil, or perhaps more importantly morally right to present such an argument in order to encourage religious belief?

Why might a response of "Go to Hell" be inappropriate in the face of such a threat to one's well-being, while the threat itself may receive a pass?
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

User avatar
EduChris
Prodigy
Posts: 4615
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:34 pm
Location: U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: Non-believers to BURN IN HELL!

Post #45

Post by EduChris »

JoeyKnothead wrote:Some'll say that if you reject Bible tales, you'll burn in Hell...Please offer some means to confirm the veracity of the claim...
Obviously some people do say this very thing; if we need to prove that some people say this, all we have to do is look at the OP wherein Joey makes this statement.

JoeyKnothead wrote:...is it uncivil, or perhaps more importantly morally right to present such an argument in order to encourage religious belief?...
Around here, the claim is more often presented as a strawman argument put forward by non-theists for the purpose of bolstering their own egos in the way that strawman arguments always seem to bolster the egos of those who gravitate toward strawman arguments in the first place.

JoeyKnothead wrote:Why might a response of "Go to Hell" be inappropriate in the face of such a threat to one's well-being, while the threat itself may receive a pass?
Personally, I think strawman arguments are not often "given a pass"; most often they are just not given any serious consideration by thoughtful people of good will.

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

Post #46

Post by JoeyKnothead »

From Post 45:
EduChris wrote: Obviously some people do say this very thing; if we need to prove that some people say this, all we have to do is look at the OP wherein Joey makes this statement.
Why of course, no Christian in history has ever uttered the phrase :roll:
Bible Gateway, KJV wrote: Revelations 21:8
But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
Is EduChris not a "True(tm) Christian"?
EduChris wrote: Around here, the claim is more often presented as a strawman argument put forward by non-theists for the purpose of bolstering their own egos in the way that strawman arguments always seem to bolster the egos of those who gravitate toward strawman arguments in the first place.
Meet the strawman himself.

Does EduChris deny that Christians have said or implied that non-believers will burn in Hell?

I propose that EduChris prefers to build his own strawman in an attempt to divert attention from what the OP seeks to discuss; the not uncommon usage of a phrase by Christians. It's openly and obviously an effort to avoid addressing the challenge laid out in the OP.

Why might'n this be? Might it be that claims of Hell can not be supported? Could it be that the very notion of Hell is merely a cudgel used by some Christians in order to strike fear into others?
EduChris wrote: Personally, I think strawman arguments are not often "given a pass"; most often they are just not given any serious consideration by thoughtful people of good will.
Then surely you'll understand why I don't give your strawman any serious consideration.

If you seek to say I do not offer good will in challenging claims, I would contend it's the claim I've challenged that doesn't offer any good will.


I contend that here's a perfect example of what it means to "debate" some Christians. Shift the conversation, shift the debate, shift, shift, shift. Shift until the OP is no longer relevant.
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

Flail

Post #47

Post by Flail »

JoeyKnothead wrote:From Post 45:
EduChris wrote: Obviously some people do say this very thing; if we need to prove that some people say this, all we have to do is look at the OP wherein Joey makes this statement.
Why of course, no Christian in history has ever uttered the phrase :roll:
Bible Gateway, KJV wrote: Revelations 21:8
But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
I have had Christian TV (apparently the most monied and representative form of indoctrinating those of the Christian faith since being broadcast nationally with expensive air time) turned on for thirty minutes and have heard the above type of standard Christian mantra no less than three times already.

User avatar
EduChris
Prodigy
Posts: 4615
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:34 pm
Location: U.S.A.
Contact:

Post #48

Post by EduChris »

JoeyKnothead wrote:...Does EduChris deny that Christians have said or implied that non-believers will burn in Hell?...
When you present a caricature of Christian theology, as it is bandied about in popular discourse among the uneducated of Christianity and non-Christianity alike, as though it had anything to do with the views of educated Christians, then you are presenting a strawman argument.

If you want to understand the views of educated Christians, there are plenty of good sources for information (and TV evangelists are not good sources, if what you're looking for is the views of educated, scholarly, credentialed Christians):

Saved from Sacrifice: A Theology of the Cross

The Mosaic of Christian Belief: Twenty Centuries of Unity & Diversity

Faith Seeking Understanding: An Introduction to Christian Theology
Last edited by EduChris on Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

Post #49

Post by JoeyKnothead »

From Post 43:
Zetesis Apistia wrote: I don't believe we can prove there is a hell, because I believe God operates in dimensions that he does not give us access to.
So, we can't know there's a Hell, but we can know God operates in dimensions "he does not give us access to". It would seem the one thing God doesn't give us access to is any way of confirming he even exists.
Zetesis Apistia wrote: I do believe that we can know some things by experience that may well indicate a hell. We know there is such a thing as suffering of the mind and soul.
Where has Zetesis Apistia shown there's a soul to be a-sufferin'?
Zetesis Apistia wrote: We know that dire circumstances can cause a degree of mental anguish that can cause a person to want to die rather than live. Why would this type of suffering cause a man to put a gun to his head? A man may be in very good health, possess great wealth, and have a loving family, and still take his own life because of his inability to endure the mental anguish that may well be the offspring of soul suffering. Can you explain why a man would do such a thing.
There's quite a bit of literature to indicate that chemical imbalances play a large roll in mental illness.
Zetesis Apistia wrote: My friend if there is no hell where is all of this heat coming from?
The sun?
Zetesis Apistia wrote: Personally I believe we are all standing on the outskirts of hell, and I think you and I feel the heat from those flames from time to time. IMO
So Hell is located in the sun?
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

Post #50

Post by JoeyKnothead »

From Post 48:
EduChris wrote:
JoeyKnothead wrote: ...Does EduChris deny that Christians have said or implied that non-believers will burn in Hell?...
When you present a caricature of Christian theology, as it is bandied about in popular discourse among the uneducated of Christianity and non-Christianity alike, as though it had anything to do with the views of educated Christians, then you are presenting a strawman argument.
Bible Gateway, KJV wrote: Revelations 21:8
But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
Does EduChris deny the above passage is in the Bible?
EduChris wrote: If you want to understand the views of educated Christians, there are plenty of good sources for information (and TV evangelists are not good sources, if what you're looking for is the views of educated, scholarly, credentialed Christians):
>links<
Are the only "educated Christians" those who hold EduChris' beliefs?
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

User avatar
EduChris
Prodigy
Posts: 4615
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:34 pm
Location: U.S.A.
Contact:

Post #51

Post by EduChris »

JoeyKnothead wrote:...Does EduChris deny the above passage is in the Bible?...
The question is not, "Is it in the Bible?"; rather, the question is, "Given the full scope of Scripture, and given the history and trajectory of biblical study and interpretation, in combination with other sources such as reason, personal life experience, and the best consensus of other contemporary global Christian thinkers, what does this passage mean?"

JoeyKnothead wrote:...Are the only "educated Christians" those who hold EduChris' beliefs?
No, unfortunately I did not write the books I listed in the previous post. But they are used in many nationally and globally accredited Christian seminaries and graduate schools, so I am not some sort of oddball maverick within the global Christian Church.

User avatar
JoeyKnothead
Banned
Banned
Posts: 20879
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
Location: Here
Has thanked: 4093 times
Been thanked: 2573 times

Post #52

Post by JoeyKnothead »

From Post 51:
EduChris wrote:
JoeyKnothead wrote: Bible Gateway, KJV
Revelations 21:8
But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

...Does EduChris deny the above passage is in the Bible?...
The question is not, "Is it in the Bible?"; rather, the question is, "Given the full scope of Scripture, and given the history and trajectory of biblical study and interpretation, in combination with other sources such as reason, personal life experience, and the best consensus of other contemporary global Christian thinkers, what does this passage mean?"
Looks to me like it means folks are ending up in Hell.

What does it mean to "educated Christians"?
EduChris wrote:
JoeyKnothead wrote: ...Are the only "educated Christians" those who hold EduChris' beliefs?
No, unfortunately I did not write the books I listed in the previous post. But they are used in many nationally and globally accredited Christian seminaries and graduate schools, so I am not some sort of oddball maverick within the global Christian Church.
When is believing some dude hopped up after being dead for three days no longer "oddball"?
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin

User avatar
EduChris
Prodigy
Posts: 4615
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:34 pm
Location: U.S.A.
Contact:

Post #53

Post by EduChris »

JoeyKnothead wrote:...Looks to me like it means folks are ending up in Hell...What does it mean to "educated Christians"?...
Among other things, it means that it may be possible to throw ones life away--to irrevocably turn oneself against love and other-directed concern, which are the very things that make life worth living.

As for the "unbelieving" part, that in no way implies that giving mere lip service to this or that proposition will suffice in turning the corner against death and toward life. It means that we must find something and someone to believe in, someone to pattern our life on, someone like God who gave up the privilege of deity for the sake of genuine solidarity with us. If the life and example and teaching of Jesus is not the example on which we base our lives, if the hope of the resurrection life is not our hope, then the chance of wasting our lives (both here and hereafter) is more real than it needs to be.

JoeyKnothead wrote:...When is believing some dude hopped up after being dead for three days no longer "oddball"?
It would be "oddball" to the extent that we had no good grounds for beliving that "necessary reality" cares for us.

User avatar
Zetesis Apistia
Guru
Posts: 1256
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 6:27 pm
Location: Indiana

Post #54

Post by Zetesis Apistia »

JoeyKnothead wrote:From Post 43:
So, we can't know there's a Hell, but we can know God operates in dimensions "he does not give us access to". It would seem the one thing God doesn't give us access to is any way of confirming he even exists.
I just had a revelation. I'll bet that's why we are required to have faith. Well duh, thanks Joey
Where has Zetesis Apistia shown there's a soul to be a-sufferin'?
I'm going to have to invoke that faith thingy again.
There's quite a bit of literature to indicate that chemical imbalances play a large roll in mental illness.
And what causes the chemical imbalances?
The sun?
Not at night Einy.
So Hell is located in the sun?
Hey that's a thought. Wonder why NASA hasn't went on an expedition there. I mean they could go at night.

Post Reply