Some'll say that if you reject Bible tales, you'll burn in Hell.
For debate:
Please offer some means to confirm the veracity of the claim.
If the claim can't be shown to be true and factual, is it uncivil, or perhaps more importantly morally right to present such an argument in order to encourage religious belief?
Why might a response of "Go to Hell" be inappropriate in the face of such a threat to one's well-being, while the threat itself may receive a pass?
Non-believers to BURN IN HELL!
Moderator: Moderators
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Post #51
The question is not, "Is it in the Bible?"; rather, the question is, "Given the full scope of Scripture, and given the history and trajectory of biblical study and interpretation, in combination with other sources such as reason, personal life experience, and the best consensus of other contemporary global Christian thinkers, what does this passage mean?"JoeyKnothead wrote:...Does EduChris deny the above passage is in the Bible?...
No, unfortunately I did not write the books I listed in the previous post. But they are used in many nationally and globally accredited Christian seminaries and graduate schools, so I am not some sort of oddball maverick within the global Christian Church.JoeyKnothead wrote:...Are the only "educated Christians" those who hold EduChris' beliefs?
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Post #52
From Post 51:
What does it mean to "educated Christians"?
Looks to me like it means folks are ending up in Hell.EduChris wrote:The question is not, "Is it in the Bible?"; rather, the question is, "Given the full scope of Scripture, and given the history and trajectory of biblical study and interpretation, in combination with other sources such as reason, personal life experience, and the best consensus of other contemporary global Christian thinkers, what does this passage mean?"JoeyKnothead wrote: Bible Gateway, KJV
Revelations 21:8
But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
...Does EduChris deny the above passage is in the Bible?...
What does it mean to "educated Christians"?
When is believing some dude hopped up after being dead for three days no longer "oddball"?EduChris wrote:No, unfortunately I did not write the books I listed in the previous post. But they are used in many nationally and globally accredited Christian seminaries and graduate schools, so I am not some sort of oddball maverick within the global Christian Church.JoeyKnothead wrote: ...Are the only "educated Christians" those who hold EduChris' beliefs?
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
Post #53
Among other things, it means that it may be possible to throw ones life away--to irrevocably turn oneself against love and other-directed concern, which are the very things that make life worth living.JoeyKnothead wrote:...Looks to me like it means folks are ending up in Hell...What does it mean to "educated Christians"?...
As for the "unbelieving" part, that in no way implies that giving mere lip service to this or that proposition will suffice in turning the corner against death and toward life. It means that we must find something and someone to believe in, someone to pattern our life on, someone like God who gave up the privilege of deity for the sake of genuine solidarity with us. If the life and example and teaching of Jesus is not the example on which we base our lives, if the hope of the resurrection life is not our hope, then the chance of wasting our lives (both here and hereafter) is more real than it needs to be.
It would be "oddball" to the extent that we had no good grounds for beliving that "necessary reality" cares for us.JoeyKnothead wrote:...When is believing some dude hopped up after being dead for three days no longer "oddball"?
- Zetesis Apistia
- Guru
- Posts: 1256
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 6:27 pm
- Location: Indiana
Post #54
JoeyKnothead wrote:From Post 43:
I just had a revelation. I'll bet that's why we are required to have faith. Well duh, thanks JoeySo, we can't know there's a Hell, but we can know God operates in dimensions "he does not give us access to". It would seem the one thing God doesn't give us access to is any way of confirming he even exists.I'm going to have to invoke that faith thingy again.Where has Zetesis Apistia shown there's a soul to be a-sufferin'?
And what causes the chemical imbalances?There's quite a bit of literature to indicate that chemical imbalances play a large roll in mental illness.Not at night Einy.The sun?Hey that's a thought. Wonder why NASA hasn't went on an expedition there. I mean they could go at night.So Hell is located in the sun?
- Tired of the Nonsense
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 5680
- Joined: Fri Oct 30, 2009 6:01 pm
- Location: USA
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #55
JoeyKnothead wrote: So Hell is located in the sun?
Zetesis Apistia wrote: Hey that's a thought. Wonder why NASA hasn't went on an expedition there. I mean they could go at night.
My first response here was that nobody could really be this ignorant and that this is a gag answer, meant to be funny and not meant to be taken seriously. And as I was in the process of chuckling to myself I suddenly remembered a Christian lady who once told me that clearly God must exist, because every year the rain falls, and yet the whole world is not covered in water. If it's possible for a person to be so ignorant of the actual working of the universe as to manage to suppose that God is required to regulate the amount of water on the earth then it is certainly possible for another person to genuinely suppose that it would be easier to go to the sun at night, when it would clearly be cooler.
Post #56
EduChris wrote:The question is not, "Is it in the Bible?"; rather, the question is, "Given the full scope of Scripture, and given the history and trajectory of biblical study and interpretation, in combination with other sources such as reason, personal life experience, and the best consensus of other contemporary global Christian thinkers, what does this passage mean?"JoeyKnothead wrote:...Does EduChris deny the above passage is in the Bible?...
Yes, agreed. What do you think it means? I think it implies that those 'thrown into the fire' will simply no longer exist -- the second death -- while true believers will attain a second life.
I don't think non-existence bothers too many atheists, since that is what they expect anyway.
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Post #57
From Post 53:
It says unbelievers, among others, are heading to a lake of fire and brimstone.
No doubt the "educated Christian" would, nay, must put their own spin on the "word of God".
Still pushing that whole "necessary reality cares for us" deal, eh?
Here's a reality, you've done nothing to show the referenced passage means anything other that what is written, except perhaps to declare yourself "educated".
Or is it that your spin on these words is an example of the mental contortions one must endure in order to maintain belief?EduChris wrote:Among other things, it means that it may be possible to throw ones life away--to irrevocably turn oneself against love and other-directed concern, which are the very things that make life worth living.JoeyKnothead wrote: Bible Gateway, KJV
Revelations 21:8
But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
-----
Looks to me like it means folks are ending up in Hell.
What does it mean to "educated Christians"?
But it doesn't say that, does it?EduChris wrote: As for the "unbelieving" part, that in no way implies that giving mere lip service to this or that proposition will suffice in turning the corner against death and toward life. It means that we must find something and someone to believe in, someone to pattern our life on, someone like God who gave up the privilege of deity for the sake of genuine solidarity with us. If the life and example and teaching of Jesus is not the example on which we base our lives, if the hope of the resurrection life is not our hope, then the chance of wasting our lives (both here and hereafter) is more real than it needs to be.
It says unbelievers, among others, are heading to a lake of fire and brimstone.
No doubt the "educated Christian" would, nay, must put their own spin on the "word of God".
LOLEduChris wrote:It would be "oddball" to the extent that we had no good grounds for beliving that "necessary reality" cares for us.JoeyKnothead wrote: ...When is believing some dude hopped up after being dead for three days no longer "oddball"?
Still pushing that whole "necessary reality cares for us" deal, eh?
Here's a reality, you've done nothing to show the referenced passage means anything other that what is written, except perhaps to declare yourself "educated".
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
- JoeyKnothead
- Banned
- Posts: 20879
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 10:59 am
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 4093 times
- Been thanked: 2573 times
Post #58
From Post 54:
Do you?
When you can actually support your contentions with something other'n opinion, we'd sure 'preciate it.Zetesis Apistia wrote:I just had a revelation. I'll bet that's why we are required to have faith. Well duh, thanks JoeyJoeyKnothead wrote: So, we can't know there's a Hell, but we can know God operates in dimensions "he does not give us access to". It would seem the one thing God doesn't give us access to is any way of confirming he even exists.
So we see, Zetesis Apistia is incapable of showing he speaks truth regarding there being "souls", much less that they'd be suffering.Zetesis Apistia wrote:I'm going to have to invoke that faith thingy again.JoeyKnothead wrote: Where has Zetesis Apistia shown there's a soul to be a-sufferin'?
I don't know.Zetesis Apistia wrote:And what causes the chemical imbalances?JoeyKnothead wrote: There's quite a bit of literature to indicate that chemical imbalances play a large roll in mental illness.
Do you?
Then why don't you tell us where this heat comes from, Einy.Zetesis Apistia wrote:Not at night Einy.JoeyKnothead wrote: The sun?
I can only conclude you are joking.Zetesis Apistia wrote:Hey that's a thought. Wonder why NASA hasn't went on an expedition there. I mean they could go at night.JoeyKnothead wrote: So Hell is located in the sun?
I might be Teddy Roosevelt, but I ain't.
-Punkinhead Martin
-Punkinhead Martin
Post #59
Tired of the Nonsense wrote:JoeyKnothead wrote: So Hell is located in the sun?Zetesis Apistia wrote: Hey that's a thought. Wonder why NASA hasn't went on an expedition there. I mean they could go at night.
My first response here was that nobody could really be this ignorant and that this is a gag answer, meant to be funny and not meant to be taken seriously. And as I was in the process of chuckling to myself I suddenly remembered a Christian lady who once told me that clearly God must exist, because every year the rain falls, and yet the whole world is not covered in water. If it's possible for a person to be so ignorant of the actual working of the universe as to manage to suppose that God is required to regulate the amount of water on the earth then it is certainly possible for another person to genuinely suppose that it would be easier to go to the sun at night, when it would clearly be cooler.

I have a feeling that the reference to heat was a metaphor and when it was missed the sun thing was satirical. Zetesis please put me out of my misery and say it is so.
\"Give me a good question over a good answer anyday.\"
- nursebenjamin
- Sage
- Posts: 823
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:38 am
- Location: Massachusetts
Post #60
[center][youtube][/youtube][/center]Tired of the Nonsense wrote:... If it's possible for a person to be so ignorant of the actual working of the universe as to manage to suppose that God is required to regulate the amount of water on the earth then it is certainly possible for another person to genuinely suppose that it would be easier to go to the sun at night, when it would clearly be cooler.