What did the Urey/Miller experiment provide?
Moderator: Moderators
- Nilloc James
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1696
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:53 am
- Location: Canada
- Jax Agnesson
- Guru
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 11:54 am
- Location: UK
Post #4
Wot Nilloc sed.
It's a clue.
Science is usually developed in incremental stages. Little by little, not setting out to 'prove' anything.
Urey/Miller was a well-designed experiment; it was not unnecessarily complicated, but it covered all the points it needed to cover; it was clear, easy to examine and to challenge; and it pointed a way to search onward. The result was important for future work.
That's what good science is like.
But I don't know if it 'proved' anything other than what has already been mentioned; ie that the basic molecules of life will assemble from a jumbled collection of their component elements and simple compounds, given some fairly ordinary conditions (the presence of a water cycle and lightning) and some time.
It's a clue.
Science is usually developed in incremental stages. Little by little, not setting out to 'prove' anything.
Urey/Miller was a well-designed experiment; it was not unnecessarily complicated, but it covered all the points it needed to cover; it was clear, easy to examine and to challenge; and it pointed a way to search onward. The result was important for future work.
That's what good science is like.
But I don't know if it 'proved' anything other than what has already been mentioned; ie that the basic molecules of life will assemble from a jumbled collection of their component elements and simple compounds, given some fairly ordinary conditions (the presence of a water cycle and lightning) and some time.
- Nilloc James
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1696
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:53 am
- Location: Canada
Post #6
I suppose; we already radically change species with our current technology, e.g. genetically engineering goats to produce spider web proteins in their milk. It wouldn't surprise me if one day the technology exists.
- Nickman
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 5443
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Idaho
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #7
I think it shows that by simple manipulation of DNA we could make any creature because our DNA isall the same, just in different sequences. Starting out as amino acids into protiens, into RNA into DNA is consistent with this. Im still not sold on evolution, even though I am an atheist, but it is much more practical and reasonable than "god did it".Nilloc James wrote: I suppose; we already radically change species with our current technology, e.g. genetically engineering goats to produce spider web proteins in their milk. It wouldn't surprise me if one day the technology exists.
- Nilloc James
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1696
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 1:53 am
- Location: Canada
Post #8
Well not all the same. There a differences in content and differences in the how the DNA is utilized.Nickman wrote:I think it shows that by simple manipulation of DNA we could make any creature because our DNA isall the same, just in different sequences. Starting out as amino acids into protiens, into RNA into DNA is consistent with this. Im still not sold on evolution, even though I am an atheist, but it is much more practical and reasonable than "god did it".Nilloc James wrote: I suppose; we already radically change species with our current technology, e.g. genetically engineering goats to produce spider web proteins in their milk. It wouldn't surprise me if one day the technology exists.
- Nickman
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 5443
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 8:51 am
- Location: Idaho
- Been thanked: 1 time
Post #9
So dna is not all the same in terms of material?Nilloc James wrote:Well not all the same. There a differences in content and differences in the how the DNA is utilized.Nickman wrote:I think it shows that by simple manipulation of DNA we could make any creature because our DNA isall the same, just in different sequences. Starting out as amino acids into protiens, into RNA into DNA is consistent with this. Im still not sold on evolution, even though I am an atheist, but it is much more practical and reasonable than "god did it".Nilloc James wrote: I suppose; we already radically change species with our current technology, e.g. genetically engineering goats to produce spider web proteins in their milk. It wouldn't surprise me if one day the technology exists.