Do we have a soul that only God can destroy?

Argue for and against Christianity

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
McCulloch
Site Supporter
Posts: 24063
Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Toronto, ON, CA
Been thanked: 3 times

Do we have a soul that only God can destroy?

Post #1

Post by McCulloch »

YahDough wrote: While you may consider my statement an opinion, I will also defend it as truth. We have a soul with a consciousness that only God can destroy.
Do we have a soul with a consciousness that only God can destroy?
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John

User avatar
Danmark
Site Supporter
Posts: 12697
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:58 am
Location: Seattle
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Do we have a soul that only God can destroy?

Post #2

Post by Danmark »

[Replying to post 1 by McCulloch]

While there is no evidence for an eternal 'soul', or for consciousness separate and apart from what the physical brain produces, there is increasing evidence from neuropsychology of a completely material basis for the mind, for consciousness and for the unconscious.

We know that chemicals and physical trauma to the brain cause changes in personality, behavior and consciousness. We know that when certain areas of the brain are interfered with or damaged, we can predict particular dysfunctions that will result.

These findings have dealt a virtual death blow to ancient dualism that holds the mind is separate from the body.

User avatar
Clownboat
Savant
Posts: 10000
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:42 pm
Has thanked: 1214 times
Been thanked: 1609 times

Re: Do we have a soul that only God can destroy?

Post #3

Post by Clownboat »

McCulloch wrote:
YahDough wrote: While you may consider my statement an opinion, I will also defend it as truth. We have a soul with a consciousness that only God can destroy.
Do we have a soul with a consciousness that only God can destroy?
It seems that we don't.
Danmark, did a good job of explaining the "why" IMO.
You can give a man a fish and he will be fed for a day, or you can teach a man to pray for fish and he will starve to death.

I blame man for codifying those rules into a book which allowed superstitious people to perpetuate a barbaric practice. Rules that must be followed or face an invisible beings wrath. - KenRU

It is sad that in an age of freedom some people are enslaved by the nomads of old. - Marco

If you are unable to demonstrate that what you believe is true and you absolve yourself of the burden of proof, then what is the purpose of your arguments? - brunumb

keithprosser3

Post #4

Post by keithprosser3 »

Let me suggest that consciousness is to a brain what electricity is to a dynamo,
ie not part of it, nor identical to it but wholly dependent on it.

Hence, no brain no consciousness even though 'consciousness does not equal brain'

User avatar
scourge99
Guru
Posts: 2060
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 3:07 am
Location: The Wild West

Post #5

Post by scourge99 »

keithprosser3 wrote: Let me suggest that consciousness is to a brain what electricity is to a dynamo,
ie not part of it, nor identical to it but wholly dependent on it.

Hence, no brain no consciousness even though 'consciousness does not equal brain'
Obviously consciousness does not equal brain. Just as software does not equal a computer. But there are multiple lines of converging evidence that make a strong case that the mind is the product of a brain.

What evidence is there that supports the idea that the mind is not fundamentally emergent from material. I. E., that it is a different substance that cannot be completely reduced to physical processes? Near death experiences? Philosophical musings? Arguments from incredulity? Arguments from intuition?
Religion remains the only mode of discourse that encourages grown men and women to pretend to know things they manifestly do not know.

User avatar
HiddenHand
Apprentice
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:20 am
Location: JHB, RSA

Post #6

Post by HiddenHand »

Before we even get to the existence of a soul, I think we need to establish who the 'observer' is. What, or to personify it, who is the observer behind my eyes? What is 'consciousness' and why are we self-aware, cognisant beings? Is my spirit the entity experiencing my bodily reality? If so, how did it come into being?

Or...

Is our consciousness an expression of some unseen, universal oneness that the Buddhists speak of? Is individuality an illusion? Or is consciousness purely a result of our evolved biological processes by which we have become self-aware?

Is consciousness a result of having a soul? Or have we conjured up the idea of a soul due to our self-awareness?

McCulloch, I know your OP is directed at baiting those who believe in souls but for me, these are the questions I would like the know the answer to. I hope they won't derail the topic too much.

Cheers :)

alwayson
Sage
Posts: 736
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 6:02 pm

Post #7

Post by alwayson »

The soul concept is just an extreme reification of identity (atman).

People don't even have identity or self......let alone a soul.

I'm speaking from the Buddhist POV.

User avatar
Danmark
Site Supporter
Posts: 12697
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:58 am
Location: Seattle
Been thanked: 1 time

Post #8

Post by Danmark »

HiddenHand wrote: Before we even get to the existence of a soul, I think we need to establish who the 'observer' is. What, or to personify it, who is the observer behind my eyes? What is 'consciousness' and why are we self-aware, cognisant beings? Is my spirit the entity experiencing my bodily reality? If so, how did it come into being?

Or...

Is our consciousness an expression of some unseen, universal oneness that the Buddhists speak of? Is individuality an illusion? Or is consciousness purely a result of our evolved biological processes by which we have become self-aware?

Is consciousness a result of having a soul? Or have we conjured up the idea of a soul due to our self-awareness?

McCulloch, I know your OP is directed at baiting those who believe in souls but for me, these are the questions I would like the know the answer to. I hope they won't derail the topic too much.

Cheers :)
Why posit any of this? All each of us knows for certain is that I, the individual, experiences consciousness. Why speculate on some unseen observer beyond the self? Or speculate that somehow my consciousness involves others?

I'm not suggesting there is nothing beyond what I experience. My point is that we should not go off on speculative flights of fancy without some reason or evidence.

User avatar
HiddenHand
Apprentice
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:20 am
Location: JHB, RSA

Post #9

Post by HiddenHand »

Danmark wrote:
HiddenHand wrote: Before we even get to the existence of a soul, I think we need to establish who the 'observer' is. What, or to personify it, who is the observer behind my eyes? What is 'consciousness' and why are we self-aware, cognisant beings? Is my spirit the entity experiencing my bodily reality? If so, how did it come into being?

Or...

Is our consciousness an expression of some unseen, universal oneness that the Buddhists speak of? Is individuality an illusion? Or is consciousness purely a result of our evolved biological processes by which we have become self-aware?

Is consciousness a result of having a soul? Or have we conjured up the idea of a soul due to our self-awareness?

McCulloch, I know your OP is directed at baiting those who believe in souls but for me, these are the questions I would like the know the answer to. I hope they won't derail the topic too much.

Cheers :)
Why posit any of this? All each of us knows for certain is that I, the individual, experiences consciousness. Why speculate on some unseen observer beyond the self? Or speculate that somehow my consciousness involves others?

I'm not suggesting there is nothing beyond what I experience. My point is that we should not go off on speculative flights of fancy without some reason or evidence.
I am only asking questions. Is this not relevant to the discussion?

I apologise for my flights of fancy. These were just the questions that popped into my head when I read the OP.

Carry on.

Cheers :)
Last edited by HiddenHand on Wed Jun 19, 2013 3:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Suzy
Apprentice
Posts: 234
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2013 12:54 pm

Post #10

Post by Suzy »

It seems simple to me, religion is man made. Religion came up with the concept of ‘the soul’ so there is no soul.
Is that too simple?

Post Reply