Sharing Information of and about Langan's work free of being ignored or ridiculed With my own searches the only thing I could see/find was things more philosophical ( CTMU's philosophical underpinning alone) In-which the author cites in Kant and in Cartesian dualism. Being as bright as the author has (although I only read a full third of it) 'probably' shown multi-layers to the concept of dualism within CTMU Sadly, CTMU Law (like Brannigan's Law) is too swift and anticlimatic (?)Modelling of the Cosmos or CTMU
```````````````````````````````````````
Mega International Online paper for reading is not unlike AJ Jacobs' (an author) work in one aspect (FYI the author of:The Know-It-All : One Man's Humble Quest to Become the Smartest Person in the World)" it shoots for the sky.
... Discusing the question about the paper's point about this "distributed solipsism", is underdiscussed, where in a self-styled commentary says:seems to be "distributed among many people and influences", this merely amounts to" [a kind of "giant solipsism"] after In Chris's paper (irrespective of your belief) is injured by pseudo contradicts and there-by invalidate any supposition that this a new spin on the same tired arguments for the "creator". If you failed to read the paper (as I have) then we are-not able to tell if CTMU teaches us about the entire is neither random nor deterministic in the usual sense, but is only a product of the cognative processes of the Meta-Figure By these means through which :telic recursion, self-directed reality "re-creates itself" I should put an "x" is not for what you might think but due to the highly unexplainatory passages in the articles all...an intersect within the link via his description of a re-defined solipsistic "abstract/concrete "Self" of the universe distributed over all of its 'reality" I know what a Solipists (since the age of-12). But, I am very confused about metaphysical resolution his driving for Nonetheless, Without seeing it this model is of the greatest value to Theist and Anti-Theistic (Atheists) to both. Chris should have been given a Nobel Price; he[certainly] is a h-e-double hockey of a lot more deserving than some of the more recent RECIPIENTS Humanitarian and medical-aid works are fine but a concept redefining out of-the-box thinking is of some good too . Traditionally, man has relied on a combination of faith and logic rather than observation. His theories are not from observation but we can't assume that there is no Logic to the theory Logical theology has shifted in the sands since that middle of the half century. But a ID theory that can excite "all peoples" and teaches that all of reality in our cosmos is interrelated Must merit worth even from a purely theological inquiry. Without actuallly realizing what it is that he had done There is the new direction Chris took That can excite both believers and atheist. So, I have a question equations he has chosen not just the math but it's grounding in logic and mathematics. Nobody with any smarts sees that it should not be within the domain of modern analytical thought..... Hasn't Christopher's other works about an "Intelligence" (Logical argument) just used to proping-up your belief in this non-existent being? This is my view ............
"A question. Since before your sun burned hot in space, and before your race was born, I have awaited a question."
**(re)sources
Link/url:www.megainternational.org © 2002-2003 Christopher Michael .....
RE: SUCCESS 4 IDers w/ Langan's CTMU
Moderator: Moderators
-
EuropasHonor
- Newbie
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 4:46 pm
RE: SUCCESS 4 IDers w/ Langan's CTMU
Post #1
Last edited by EuropasHonor on Wed Oct 12, 2005 10:45 pm, edited 62 times in total.
