To: Nancy Patricia Pelosi
Speaker of the United States House of Representatives
I’m a fellow American citizen; I ask you to do what you were voted to do,
Please send the latest version of the House’s articles of impeachment to the senate
The world-wide web will broadcast the sending of the articles; live on TV, real time
The world- wide web will broadcast the articles being received by the Senate; live TV, in real time
The world- wide web will broadcast what Senator (Mitch) McCONNELL does next-----------
This process will force the Republican held senate to be “publicly respond� in the eyes of the public for all to see; in real time
Please, talk to your house; then do what needs to be done
There’s no reason to wait until tomorrow to do what you can do today
History is in the making
Just a suggestion
Thank you, Nancy Pelosi
Anyone else agree/disagree-?
To: Nancy Patricia Pelosi
Moderator: Moderators
- 2ndRateMind
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2017 4:25 am
- Location: Pilgrim on another way
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 68 times
Re: To: Nancy Patricia Pelosi
Post #3[Replying to post 1 by justme2]
I expect Speaker Pelosi will act against the bully Trump as and when the chances of some successful result are at their maximum.
Best wishes, 2RM.
I expect Speaker Pelosi will act against the bully Trump as and when the chances of some successful result are at their maximum.
Best wishes, 2RM.
Non omnes qui errant pereunt
Not all who wander are lost
Not all who wander are lost
Re: To: Nancy Patricia Pelosi
Post #4It's either this month or bye bye America as we know it2ndRateMind wrote: [Replying to post 1 by justme2]
I expect Speaker Pelosi will act against the bully Trump as and when the chances of some successful result are at their maximum.
Best wishes, 2RM.
Post #5
Are you going to send this to Speaker Pelosi now, or after you've polled our group?
There are four reasons not to impeach at this point:
1. There are hardly only 100 representatives favoring such action.
2. An impeachment (indictment) will fail in the Senate 'cause of Republican control.
3. If it should pass in the senate then Mike Pence becomes that party's standard bearer for president in 2020. It then becomes a whole new ball game in the 2020 election (with a candidate having relatively clean skirts).
4. Without compelling evidence that will turn the head of Republicans, it will only divide the people of America further.
I say let Trump face the music in the up-coming election. He can be defeated! He has an Achilles heel! All that needs to be done is for the Democratic candidate or DNC turn the tables on his campaign tactics of 2016 when he graciously accepted the release of Wikileaks' stolen emails from Hillary.
I suggest that after the Democratic nominee is chosen at convention, A carefully orchestrated production of campaign ads be released at short intervals that super-impose the Mueller Report's finings (facts) onto Trump's 2016-2017 videos indicting himself. Carefully orchestrated is the operational phrase! this tactic would be exactly reversed from Trump's 2016 campaign -- instead of innuendo, a factual comparison would be presented to the electorate which then can decide which candidate is at least most truthful and presidential (if that counts anymore).
There are four reasons not to impeach at this point:
1. There are hardly only 100 representatives favoring such action.
2. An impeachment (indictment) will fail in the Senate 'cause of Republican control.
3. If it should pass in the senate then Mike Pence becomes that party's standard bearer for president in 2020. It then becomes a whole new ball game in the 2020 election (with a candidate having relatively clean skirts).
4. Without compelling evidence that will turn the head of Republicans, it will only divide the people of America further.
I say let Trump face the music in the up-coming election. He can be defeated! He has an Achilles heel! All that needs to be done is for the Democratic candidate or DNC turn the tables on his campaign tactics of 2016 when he graciously accepted the release of Wikileaks' stolen emails from Hillary.
I suggest that after the Democratic nominee is chosen at convention, A carefully orchestrated production of campaign ads be released at short intervals that super-impose the Mueller Report's finings (facts) onto Trump's 2016-2017 videos indicting himself. Carefully orchestrated is the operational phrase! this tactic would be exactly reversed from Trump's 2016 campaign -- instead of innuendo, a factual comparison would be presented to the electorate which then can decide which candidate is at least most truthful and presidential (if that counts anymore).
What good is truth if its value is not more than unproven, handed-down faith?
One believes things because one is conditioned to believe them. -Aldous Huxley
Fear within the Religious will always be with them ... as long as they are fearful of death.
One believes things because one is conditioned to believe them. -Aldous Huxley
Fear within the Religious will always be with them ... as long as they are fearful of death.
Post #6
It would appear that the Mueller report didn't find much of anything except an orchestrated attempt to overthrow a sitting President. That's treason, and it looks like the shoe is about to be fitted for the other foot. The rats are already scurrying...2Dbunk wrote: Are you going to send this to Speaker Pelosi now, or after you've polled our group?
There are four reasons not to impeach at this point:
1. There are hardly only 100 representatives favoring such action.
2. An impeachment (indictment) will fail in the Senate 'cause of Republican control.
3. If it should pass in the senate then Mike Pence becomes that party's standard bearer for president in 2020. It then becomes a whole new ball game in the 2020 election (with a candidate having relatively clean skirts).
4. Without compelling evidence that will turn the head of Republicans, it will only divide the people of America further.
I say let Trump face the music in the up-coming election. He can be defeated! He has an Achilles heel! All that needs to be done is for the Democratic candidate or DNC turn the tables on his campaign tactics of 2016 when he graciously accepted the release of Wikileaks' stolen emails from Hillary.
I suggest that after the Democratic nominee is chosen at convention, A carefully orchestrated production of campaign ads be released at short intervals that super-impose the Mueller Report's finings (facts) onto Trump's 2016-2017 videos indicting himself. Carefully orchestrated is the operational phrase! this tactic would be exactly reversed from Trump's 2016 campaign -- instead of innuendo, a factual comparison would be presented to the electorate which then can decide which candidate is at least most truthful and presidential (if that counts anymore).
Post #7
It sounds to me that you read very little of the Mueller Report. If you are drawing your conclusions on William Barr's meager summary, you are not interested in digging a little deeper for the truth.shnarkle wrote:It would appear that the Mueller report didn't find much of anything except an orchestrated attempt to overthrow a sitting President. That's treason, and it looks like the shoe is about to be fitted for the other foot. The rats are already scurrying...2Dbunk wrote: Are you going to send this to Speaker Pelosi now, or after you've polled our group?
There are four reasons not to impeach at this point:
1. There are hardly only 100 representatives favoring such action.
2. An impeachment (indictment) will fail in the Senate 'cause of Republican control.
3. If it should pass in the senate then Mike Pence becomes that party's standard bearer for president in 2020. It then becomes a whole new ball game in the 2020 election (with a candidate having relatively clean skirts).
4. Without compelling evidence that will turn the head of Republicans, it will only divide the people of America further.
I say let Trump face the music in the up-coming election. He can be defeated! He has an Achilles heel! All that needs to be done is for the Democratic candidate or DNC turn the tables on his campaign tactics of 2016 when he graciously accepted the release of Wikileaks' stolen emails from Hillary.
I suggest that after the Democratic nominee is chosen at convention, A carefully orchestrated production of campaign ads be released at short intervals that super-impose the Mueller Report's finings (facts) onto Trump's 2016-2017 videos indicting himself. Carefully orchestrated is the operational phrase! this tactic would be exactly reversed from Trump's 2016 campaign -- instead of innuendo, a factual comparison would be presented to the electorate which then can decide which candidate is at least most truthful and presidential (if that counts anymore).
Any other person in this country would be indicted by the Special Counsel on ten counts of obstruction of justice -- the president is immune to any such indictment, so Mueller's hands were tied!
You should study the Report since you helped pay for it. If you've studied it and come to the conclusion you shared with us, then you like the Republican Kool Aid or you are an ostrich with sand in your eyes.
What good is truth if its value is not more than unproven, handed-down faith?
One believes things because one is conditioned to believe them. -Aldous Huxley
Fear within the Religious will always be with them ... as long as they are fearful of death.
One believes things because one is conditioned to believe them. -Aldous Huxley
Fear within the Religious will always be with them ... as long as they are fearful of death.
- Daedalus X
- Apprentice
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2019 7:33 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: To: Nancy Patricia Pelosi
Post #8Looks like she is finally going to grant your request, but why? She did not want to poke the bear, she wanted to impeach Trump at the ballot box in November 2020, why the sudden turnaround?justme2 wrote: Please send the latest version of the House’s articles of impeachment to the senate
Was it the whistleblower reporting that Trump has asked Zelensky, the president of the Ukraine, to assist in investigating the 2016 election meddling? Does Ms Pelosi know something that we don't know? Here is a short report (23 min) from the "progressive" night club comedian Jimmy Dore, explaining why the Democrats (including Ms Pelosi) may be concerned about the close scrutiny.
- Daedalus X
- Apprentice
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2019 7:33 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 12 times
Post #9
We have something better than the Muller Report, we have Robert Muller himself to tell us what the situation is. And I agree with Bill Maher in this interview. (one minute)2Dbunk wrote: You should study the Report since you helped pay for it. If you've studied it and come to the conclusion you shared with us, then you like the Republican Kool Aid or you are an ostrich with sand in your eyes.