Thanks for the question scottlittlefield17.
As you pointed out, the context of what I wrote was in regards to
being a member of my ideal church. It doesn't matter if one is a millennialist, amillennialst, postmillennialist, premillennialist, preterist. If one is a creationist or an evolutionist. If one believes in speaking in tongues or not. If one supports homosexual marriages or not. If one supports woman's right to choose or banning all abortions. If one is a Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, or whatever. If one is a teetotaler or one that supports selling alcohol on Sunday. Or one who believes in total immersion or sprinkling. Or believes in the 5 points of Calvinism or in Arminianism.
Now, if someone else would like to participate in a church that only has members that has the exact same ideology as themselves, that is their freedom to do so. But, personally, I believe that a church should embrace as many people as possible and put up as few restrictions as possible.
There does have to be a minimum set of restrictions though. And that if one can accept the following two, it's good enough for me:
1. We believe the Bible to be from God and is the basis for the Christian life.
2. We believe Jesus Christ saves us and he alone atones for our sins.
Actually, there are some more, but these two can suffice.
Let me be clear however that I do not support sinful behavior. I believe the Bible is clear on what is sinful behavior. But, we are all sinners. If perfect behavior is a criteria for being a Christian, then none of us are Christians.
If the members agree on point 1, then there is a basis to define sinful behavior and how to deal with it.
scottlittlefield17 wrote:Don't you read the Bible?
I've read the entire Bible many times straight through. And I've taught and attended many Bible studies. So, yes, I've read the Bible.
scottlittlefield17 wrote:Just believing in Jesus is not enough.
I would agree that just because someone says "Lord, lord", that would not mean God would let him into heaven. God alone can judge who would enter into heaven, even if that person does think he is a Christian.
But, how am I able to judge who is truly a Christian or not? The only way I can tell if that person says that he has accepted Jesus as his savior. I cannot add additional requirements to determine if that person is a Christian or not.
Goose wrote:Though I disagree with O that some of the issues (such as homosexuality or abortion) he listed aren't important, and by implication should never be topics addressed by the church,
For the record, I'm against same gender sex and against abortions. And I believe these issues are important. And I believe the church should definitely address these issues. However, I do not believe in the ratings of sin. Is someone who has 100 same sex partners a year a worse sinner than me? No, we are both sinners. Is someone who had an abortion a worse sinner than me? No.
Sin does need to be addressed in the church. But it should not be addressed by not letting those people come in the doors of the church. Their hearts should change only be the power of the Word and the Holy Spirit. If we exclude these people from entering the church in the first place, then what hope is there of them ever changing?
Goose wrote:I will add that I would feel very uncomfortable in a church that allowed homosexual relationships, abortion, and drunkenness to go on undressed
I as well. I would add though that
any sin that is unaddressed would make me feel uncomfortable. When was the last sermon anyone heard on the sin of overeating?
"Phl 3:19 Whose end [is] destruction, whose God [is their] belly, and [whose] glory [is] in their shame, who mind earthly things.)"
What about hypocrisy, unfaithfulness, divorce, materialism, legalism, pride, pornography, etc? All these run rampant in Christian circles, but how seriously does the church try to address these?
If a church never called anyone to become baptized in the Holy Spirit or by water I'd be puzzled by that as well.
We are commanded to baptize others. Yet, even churches fail to take this seriously. In the Bible, believers were immediately baptized in water. Nowadays there is a signficiant time between one's "personal decision" and when one is baptized.
scottlittlefield17 wrote:Otseng seems to say that it is alright to do those things and to continue in them.
Nowhere do I say that. It is not acceptable for any Christian to do anything sinful. But, having perfect behavior is not a criteria for being a Christian.
By not having the church address it (which is the churches responsibility to address problems) he seems to be saying that it is OK
I have not said that either. Churches should definitely address all issues.
Everybody sins but to not call sin sin seems out of whack.
I'm not sure where you are reading all this by what I've said.
Christ requires obedience. If there is no obedience than you will not go to heaven whether you believe in Jesus or not.
Being a Christian does require obedience. But, I am not going to judge another person on what level of obedience is sufficient for that person to enter heaven.
I will also add that Christianity nowadays has too much easy-believism. That is, the church as a whole does not emphasize carrying the cross. Instead it has watered down the gospel. It's like, "come into our gym for free". But it rarely talks about weight training and actually lifting some weights.
I would say that Biblicaly speaking saying a prayer when you are three and living the rest of your life how you want will not get you to heaven.
I don't think so either. But, I'll let God sort out who are the "real" Christians and who are not.
Matt 13:25-30 wrote:But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.
But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.
So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares?
He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?
But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.
Hope that clarifies where I stand on things. If not, feel free to ask more questions.