- Adam and Eve have an "explicit role in the biblical creation myth as being the first humans."
- "Their explicit role as the first humans [is] described in Genesis."
- "According to the biblical creation myth there was (...) only two" people originally.
- "Genesis very clearly does describe Adam and Eve as the first humans that this God created."
Were Adam and Eve the First Humans?
Moderator: Moderators
- John Bauer
- Apprentice
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2019 11:31 pm
- Has thanked: 122 times
- Been thanked: 64 times
Were Adam and Eve the First Humans?
Post #1In the thread "Genetics and Adam and Eve," DrNoGods claimed that the creation narrative in Genesis describes Adam and Eve as the first humans. He said that
- DrNoGods
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2716
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:18 pm
- Location: Nevada
- Has thanked: 593 times
- Been thanked: 1642 times
Re: Were Adam and Eve the First Humans?
Post #51[Replying to jimtatertayte in post #47]
That I don't know what? Elaborate please, as this response has no relationship to my post in any way. Are the "devils" you mention your own imagination, or do you have some source for why you think they "roamed the earth" at the time of the imaginary Adam and Eve of bible fame?Or maybe you do not know that you do not know.
In human affairs the sources of success are ever to be found in the fountains of quick resolve and swift stroke; and it seems to be a law, inflexible and inexorable, that he who will not risk cannot win.
John Paul Jones, 1779
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain
John Paul Jones, 1779
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain
-
- Scholar
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:39 pm
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Were Adam and Eve the First Humans?
Post #52If you do not have the ability to converse with meDrNoGods wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:37 pm [Replying to jimtatertayte in post #47]
That I don't know what? Elaborate please, as this response has no relationship to my post in any way. Are the "devils" you mention your own imagination, or do you have some source for why you think they "roamed the earth" at the time of the imaginary Adam and Eve of bible fame?Or maybe you do not know that you do not know.
without disrespecting me than I do not have the ability to converse
with you in respect. And since it is your own words that
honor you or dishonor you I need not disrespect you.
- DrNoGods
- Prodigy
- Posts: 2716
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:18 pm
- Location: Nevada
- Has thanked: 593 times
- Been thanked: 1642 times
Re: Were Adam and Eve the First Humans?
Post #53[Replying to jimtatertayte in post #52]
There is nothing I've said to you that is disrespectful in any way. I simply asked a question that you evidently cannot, or will not, answer, or don't understand for some reason. But I'm happy to not waste any more time since your responses have nothing at all to do with the questions.If you do not have the ability to converse with me
without disrespecting me than I do not have the ability to converse
with you in respect. And since it is your own words that
honor you or dishonor you I need not disrespect you.
Last edited by DrNoGods on Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
In human affairs the sources of success are ever to be found in the fountains of quick resolve and swift stroke; and it seems to be a law, inflexible and inexorable, that he who will not risk cannot win.
John Paul Jones, 1779
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain
John Paul Jones, 1779
The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.
Mark Twain
- otseng
- Savant
- Posts: 20516
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
- Contact:
Re: Were Adam and Eve the First Humans?
Post #549. No unconstructive one-liners posts are allowed in debates.
Kindly refrain from making posts that contribute nothing to debate and/or simply express agreement / disagreement or make other frivolous remarks.
- otseng
- Savant
- Posts: 20516
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
- Contact:
Re: Were Adam and Eve the First Humans?
Post #55Moderator Commentjimtatertayte wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:55 pm Somethings are the demonstration of the truth requiring
no burden of proof for the wise for it's purpose is hidden from
them that are stupid to which is it's primary objective, in the first place.
Please do not indirectly or directly attack others on the forum.
Please review the Rules.
______________
Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
-
- Scholar
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:39 pm
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Were Adam and Eve the First Humans?
Post #56Please give me a warning before you ban me.otseng wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:10 pmModerator Commentjimtatertayte wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 4:55 pm Somethings are the demonstration of the truth requiring
no burden of proof for the wise for it's purpose is hidden from
them that are stupid to which is it's primary objective, in the first place.
Please do not indirectly or directly attack others on the forum.
Please review the Rules.
______________
Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
Thank you.
- The Tanager
- Savant
- Posts: 5023
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2015 11:08 am
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 151 times
Re: Were Adam and Eve the First Humans?
Post #57Moderator Commentjimtatertayte wrote: ↑Mon Sep 21, 2020 8:57 pmPlease give me a warning before you ban me.
Thank you.
Please respond to moderator comments via private message.
Please review the Rules.
______________
Moderator comments do not count as a strike against any posters. They only serve as an acknowledgment that a post report has been received, but has not been judged to warrant a moderator warning against a particular poster. Any challenges or replies to moderator postings should be made via Private Message to avoid derailing topics.
[/quote]
-
- Scholar
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:39 pm
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Were Adam and Eve the First Humans?
Post #58A devil is an angel that has lost the image of God through sin.Tcg wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:28 pmGiven that you made the following claim:jimtatertayte wrote: ↑Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:06 pm
Do you even know what is a devil?
What is a devil? Explain it to me.
You need to explain what you meant by the word devils in this quote above. That and of course actually provide evidence to support this claim. Whether or not Judas was a devil is irrelevant to your claim. What others think of the meaning of word devil is also irrelevant. What matters is what you think it means and your ability to support your claim.jimtatertayte wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 6:06 pm
Devils, when God created Adam and Eve there were devils and their offspring roaming the earth.
Tcg
The children of the devils are the human offspring of the angels
who lost the image of God
through sin.
The offspring of the devils and their offspring
and so forth and so forth...are devils.
So a devil can either be an angel who has lost the image of God
through sin or the human offspring of them.
Is that clear enough for you?
Judas was a devil. He was the offspring of devils.
Here is proof that Judas was a devil...
John 8:44
Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.
He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth,
because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar,
and the father of it.
1 John 3:10
In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil:
whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.
Judas did the deeds of his father the devil
and he did not do righteousness. As stated in your book..he was a devil.
Is that enough support for you?
I am more than able to prove anything I so desire at anytime I so desire
and do it with the greatest of ease.
-
- Scholar
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:39 pm
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Were Adam and Eve the First Humans?
Post #59Now the next question is how do I know
that devils were roaming around on earth at the same time or even before Adam and Eve?
Your science has dated human bones found on earth far back beyond the time frame
given in the book of Genesis of the age of Adam and Eve.
There you go....your move.
that devils were roaming around on earth at the same time or even before Adam and Eve?
Your science has dated human bones found on earth far back beyond the time frame
given in the book of Genesis of the age of Adam and Eve.
There you go....your move.
- EarthScienceguy
- Guru
- Posts: 2192
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2018 2:53 pm
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
- Contact:
Re: Were Adam and Eve the First Humans?
Post #60[Replying to John Bauer in post #1]
Dr. NoGods is correct in his interpretation all except for the myth part. But Genesis is not the only place that says that Adam and Eve were the first humans.In the thread "Genetics and Adam and Eve," DrNoGods claimed that the creation narrative in Genesis describes Adam and Eve as the first humans. He said that
Adam and Eve have an "explicit role in the biblical creation myth as being the first humans."
"Their explicit role as the first humans [is] described in Genesis."
"According to the biblical creation myth there was (...) only two" people originally.
"Genesis very clearly does describe Adam and Eve as the first humans that this God created."
I would appreciate DrNoGods substantiating this claim of his, for I don't agree that Genesis says this. I would like to see this explored further.
Mark 10:6 says, “But from the beginning of the creation, God ‘made them male and female.’”
Exodus 20:11 states: “For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, and rested the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and hallowed it.”
Luke 13:14 14 But the ruler of the synagogue, indignant because Jesus had healed on the Sabbath, said to the people, “There are six days in which work ought to be done. Come on those days and be healed, and not on the Sabbath day.”
There is ample evidence from the Bible that the world was created in six days and if the world was created in six days there would have had to have been an Adam and Eve singular. There is no reason why a Christian should back down from this truth that the Bible states there is ample evidence from science to support both of these claims that the world was created in 6 days 6-10 thousand years ago and that the human race started off with just 2 humans.Mark 10:5-10 5 And Jesus said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart he wrote you this commandment. 6 But from the beginning of creation, ‘God made them male and female.’ 7, therefore, a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife,1 8 and the two shall become one flesh.’ So they are no longer two but one flesh. 9 what therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.”