From a discussion in another thread with Purple Knight.
Do you believe in ghosts? Please feel free to add any more information as a post in this thread, such as a story where you encountered something you believe was a ghost, etc.
The Existence of Ghosts
Moderator: Moderators
- Diagoras
- Guru
- Posts: 1392
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2019 12:47 am
- Has thanked: 170 times
- Been thanked: 579 times
Re: The Existence of Ghosts
Post #81To the first question, yes.AgnosticBoy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 11:45 am Your definition does not mention the laws of nature. Those that say it doesn't exist usually define it out of existence when they say everything is natural, as opposed to proving that it doesn't exist and that's faulty. Before dismissing anything, I would think logic and evidence should be used to answer the following:
- Are there regularities and limitations in the Universe? In other words, do laws of nature exist?
- If something or someone transcends those limitations, does that mean the law does not exist or is it that the law is not binding in all cases?
To the second, a 'breaking' of a law would just demonstrate that our understanding of the law in question was at least partially wrong. If we observe a particle travelling faster than light, then we may have to work on our understanding of what a 'particle' is, or what 'light' is, for instance.
I have no trouble agreeing that walking on water is a natural ability - for those people who have been observed to do so. In the general case: any observation of an event which appears to break a natural law simply provides some evidence that the law is being expressed imperfectly. Science doesn't have a 'Grand Unified Theory of Everything', so we know that at some level, our 'laws' of quantum mechanics, relativity, etc. fall short of perfection. But they do a fantastic job of explaining a lot of the 'real world'.When someone says that everything is natural, they are basically saying that if someone was discovered walking on water (unaided by man-made technology), then that automatically means that it's a natural ability. If it is then why can't everyone do it? How do you know that there aren't laws, and that the law wasn't violated? You would either have to deny it was a natural event or remain agnostic, at the least.
If we discover more about 'dark matter' and subsequently understand that it can interact with normal matter in certain circumstances to appear 'ghostlike' (to provide my own hypothetical example), then there would be no need to continue to define ghosts as supernatural. They'd be 'brought into the science tent' at that point and be able to be described and experimented upon, just like other natural phenomena.
- AgnosticBoy
- Guru
- Posts: 1620
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:44 pm
- Has thanked: 204 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
- Contact:
Re: The Existence of Ghosts
Post #82Well let's just say that if a resurrection happened today then it would be an observable event. You can confirm that someone is dead. If that same person comes back to life then you have yourself a resurrection case. You can observe and examine the person to confirm that he or she was really the person who was dead just a few days ago.Tcg wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 4:42 pmWhose resurrection? Certainly not Jesus'. He died almost 2,000 years ago, according to the tales. How could an event from 2,000 years ago be witnessed and examined today?AgnosticBoy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 3:51 pm No. I was claiming that supernatural events can be physical, like for instance, the resurrection. That's an event that can be witnessed and examined.
Even Jesus's disciples examined examined the resurrected Jesus. They touched his wounds, asked questions, etc.
In fact, I know I've said before that the supernatural isn't just limited to the non-physical, but I'll also say that the natural world isn't just limited to the physical either. Consciousness is considered a natural phenomenon but when you get down to its subjective level, then you come to realize that it can't be characterized as physical. That's why scientists once rejected studying it, but then realized they had to take it up again.
- Proud forum owner ∣ The Agnostic Forum
- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB
- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB
- AgnosticBoy
- Guru
- Posts: 1620
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:44 pm
- Has thanked: 204 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
- Contact:
Re: The Existence of Ghosts
Post #83That's possible but where I disagree with you is that i don't consider that to be the only option. It's also possible that our knowledge of the law was correct but that the law can be broken.Diagoras wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 11:32 pmTo the first question, yes.AgnosticBoy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 11:45 am Your definition does not mention the laws of nature. Those that say it doesn't exist usually define it out of existence when they say everything is natural, as opposed to proving that it doesn't exist and that's faulty. Before dismissing anything, I would think logic and evidence should be used to answer the following:
- Are there regularities and limitations in the Universe? In other words, do laws of nature exist?
- If something or someone transcends those limitations, does that mean the law does not exist or is it that the law is not binding in all cases?
To the second, a 'breaking' of a law would just demonstrate that our understanding of the law in question was at least partially wrong.
- Proud forum owner ∣ The Agnostic Forum
- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB
- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB
- AgnosticBoy
- Guru
- Posts: 1620
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:44 pm
- Has thanked: 204 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
- Contact:
Re: The Existence of Ghosts
Post #84Come on, brunumb. Jeez!brunumb wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 11:28 pmI am not aware of any verified occurrences that violate a law of nature. Do you have any in mind?AgnosticBoy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 11:09 pm Those that argue that there's no need nor room for the concept of the supernatural being applied to the real world, need to provide an explanation for what they'd call an occurrence that violates a law of nature (assuming that they accept that laws/regularities exist).
Are you being so skeptical that now you're not wanting to even accept the concept of the supernatural?
- Proud forum owner ∣ The Agnostic Forum
- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB
- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB
- brunumb
- Savant
- Posts: 6002
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2017 4:20 am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 6633 times
- Been thanked: 3222 times
Re: The Existence of Ghosts
Post #85Jeez AgnosticBoy! Can't you even provide one verified occurrence that violates a law of nature.AgnosticBoy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 11:40 pmCome on, brunumb. Jeez!brunumb wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 11:28 pmI am not aware of any verified occurrences that violate a law of nature. Do you have any in mind?AgnosticBoy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 11:09 pm Those that argue that there's no need nor room for the concept of the supernatural being applied to the real world, need to provide an explanation for what they'd call an occurrence that violates a law of nature (assuming that they accept that laws/regularities exist).
Are you being so skeptical that now you're not wanting to even accept the concept of the supernatural?
George Orwell:: “The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
Voltaire: "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
Gender ideology is anti-science, anti truth.
- Purple Knight
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3537
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 6:00 pm
- Has thanked: 1142 times
- Been thanked: 735 times
Re: The Existence of Ghosts
Post #86Then I'll use your example which is dead vs alive. Now here's the irregularity: The incredible resurrecting frog.AgnosticBoy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:42 pmOftentimes the difficulty of distinguishing between supernatural and natural is epistemic, as in our ability to have correct knowledge about regularities in nature. But a genuine supernatural case would have to be one where we are very certain of a regularity and then call it supernatural when it is violated, as opposed to just saying that the regularity wasn't in fact a regularity but a misunderstanding that needs updating.
https://www.cbc.ca/wildcanadianyear/m_b ... ern-winter
Now you will say, this isn't really an irregularity. All of these type of frogs are able to do this, so it's regular. But at some point, there was a first frog to do this; one that had the new adaptation just sufficiently to freeze and come alive again. Was that frog supernatural?
- AgnosticBoy
- Guru
- Posts: 1620
- Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2017 1:44 pm
- Has thanked: 204 times
- Been thanked: 156 times
- Contact:
Re: The Existence of Ghosts
Post #87Not necessarily. If a law or how something operates changes, then that is not supernatural. It would only be supernatural if the new or current law is violated.Purple Knight wrote: ↑Tue Jul 20, 2021 1:32 amThen I'll use your example which is dead vs alive. Now here's the irregularity: The incredible resurrecting frog.AgnosticBoy wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 5:42 pmOftentimes the difficulty of distinguishing between supernatural and natural is epistemic, as in our ability to have correct knowledge about regularities in nature. But a genuine supernatural case would have to be one where we are very certain of a regularity and then call it supernatural when it is violated, as opposed to just saying that the regularity wasn't in fact a regularity but a misunderstanding that needs updating.
https://www.cbc.ca/wildcanadianyear/m_b ... ern-winter
Now you will say, this isn't really an irregularity. All of these type of frogs are able to do this, so it's regular. But at some point, there was a first frog to do this; one that had the new adaptation just sufficiently to freeze and come alive again. Was that frog supernatural?
- Proud forum owner ∣ The Agnostic Forum
- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB
- As a non-partisan, I like to be on the side of truth. - AB
- Purple Knight
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3537
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 6:00 pm
- Has thanked: 1142 times
- Been thanked: 735 times
Re: The Existence of Ghosts
Post #88Then you're asking for a chaos universe where some occurrences are not governed by laws to have anything supernatural happen.AgnosticBoy wrote: ↑Tue Jul 20, 2021 1:52 amNot necessarily. If a law or how something operates changes, then that is not supernatural. It would only be supernatural if the new or current law is violated.
In your definition, if laws apply universally, there cannot be anything supernatural. I happen to agree because I think people only have this word to apply to things they don't understand, so they think a natural has been violated. But if you're as I am, and believe that everything that exists is governed by laws, then supernatural equals impossible.