Neanderthal Americans are alive and well, and living in New York City. As evidence and proof of this claim, I shall offer myself up as a modern living specimen and representative of millions of white Anglo-Saxon and Caucasian Americans who are racially descended from historic races of European, Near East and Middle Eastern human beings who have recently been dehumanized in natural history by neo-Darwinist race theorists as a different and separate human 'species.'
Since there is really no scientific evidence that most white Anglo-Saxon Americans of Caucasian and Neanderthal ancestry are really Homo sapiens of any sort, and that such a term is nothing more than a neo-Darwinist 'label' which doesn't stick very well and is easily removed once one discovers, realizes and admits one's own Neanderthal or Asian racial origins, the biological label, 'Homo sapiens' may be reserved and applied to only those humans who racially associate and identify themselves with common ancestors and descendents of African monkeys and apes, in the same way, and to the same degree and extent which homosexuals may self-identify and classify themselves, sexually and biologically, for civil rights purposes.
Neanderthal Americans
Moderator: Moderators
Post #91
Looks like Wolpoff and Templeton will give you Out of Africa boys a run for your money in this controversy.Grumpy wrote:http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/~reffland/an ... rica2.html
The above will get you to the refreshing waterfall of knowledge, a break from this cess pool of ignorance.
Grumpy 8)
http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/~reffland/an ... rica5.html
btw: Homo erectus was just an intermediate descendent of Neanderthal Man before evolving into Heidleberg Man and Modern Man, not a progenitor, since all human fossils are the historic remains of Noah's descendents.
Post #92
No, because humanoids don't exist.Cathar1950 wrote:Has any one ever found a 900 year old humanoid bone?
When neo-Darwinists think Neanderthals lived for a hundred thousand years before becoming extinct, anything is possible.I think if a neanderthal lived to be 50 he was a very old man.
- Cathar1950
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 10503
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 12:12 pm
- Location: Michigan(616)
- Been thanked: 2 times
Post #93
A lot of things are possible but not probable. If a neanderthal lived for 45-50 years there were old and rare. Now Cro-magman maybe 60. We humanoid today live maybe 78 years. The Bible says were are only suppose to live 70. It is in there some place , just about everything is.
So it looks like we are living longer and not shorter life spans. Does that mean we are becoming better as a fallen race?
So it looks like we are living longer and not shorter life spans. Does that mean we are becoming better as a fallen race?
Post #94
This might be the fundamental problem with your viewpoint. If you first believe that "all human fossils are the historic remains of Noah's descendents" then everything will appear to fall naturally from that.jcrawford wrote:btw: Homo erectus was just an intermediate descendent of Neanderthal Man before evolving into Heidleberg Man and Modern Man, not a progenitor, since all human fossils are the historic remains of Noah's descendents.
Every concept that can ever be needed will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings forgotten. -- George Orwell, 1984
Post #95
Humanoids don't exist outside of science fiction.Cathar1950 wrote:We humanoid today live maybe 78 years.
Man's life span was decreased to 120 years after Neanderthal Noah died.The Bible says were are only suppose to live 70. It is in there some place , just about everything is.
(Genesis 6:3)
How is 120 years longer than Methuselah's 970 years?So it looks like we are living longer and not shorter life spans.
Post #96
If you believe that all human fossils are the remains of common descendents from Africa, you have the same fundamental problem, I'd say.ST88 wrote:This might be the fundamental problem with your viewpoint. If you first believe that "all human fossils are the historic remains of Noah's descendents" then everything will appear to fall naturally from that.jcrawford wrote:btw: Homo erectus was just an intermediate descendent of Neanderthal Man before evolving into Heidleberg Man and Modern Man, not a progenitor, since all human fossils are the historic remains of Noah's descendents.
- McCulloch
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24063
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 9:10 pm
- Location: Toronto, ON, CA
- Been thanked: 3 times
Post #97
JCrawford's science seems to be drawing this picture. Round about 6 to 10 thousand years ago, God created a mammalian primate (later called Homo sapien neanderthalis) with a life span many times longer than any currently known mammal. Due to the increasing sin of this species, God decided to destroy the world and start again. Rather than starting from nothing and using magic, like the first time, this time he thought he would cause a universal flood, destroying all land creatures except for a few saved by a neanderthal named Noah. Subsequent to that flood, in only a few thousand years, this species then (de) evolved into one (now called Homo sapien sapien) with a life-span of only a few decades and into the different races which now populate the globe. The strongest evidence for this story is, of course, God's divine revelation to mankind, the Bible.
Makes sense to me. This is what science is all about!
Makes sense to me. This is what science is all about!
Examine everything carefully; hold fast to that which is good.
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
First Epistle to the Church of the Thessalonians
The truth will make you free.
Gospel of John
Post #98
Yes. We modern descendents of Neanderthal Noah call it theistic creationism or theistic science. It's our answer to the science of theistic evolution, since omniscience may be said to be a desirable quality in a creative scientist, no?McCulloch wrote:JCrawford's science seems to be drawing this picture. Round about 6 to 10 thousand years ago, God created a mammalian primate (later called Homo sapien neanderthalis) with a life span many times longer than any currently known mammal. Due to the increasing sin of this species, God decided to destroy the world and start again. Rather than starting from nothing and using magic, like the first time, this time he thought he would cause a universal flood, destroying all land creatures except for a few saved by a neanderthal named Noah. Subsequent to that flood, in only a few thousand years, this species then (de) evolved into one (now called Homo sapien sapien) with a life-span of only a few decades and into the different races which now populate the globe. The strongest evidence for this story is, of course, God's divine revelation to mankind, the Bible.
Makes sense to me. This is what science is all about!
Post #99
Thanks for the summary McC. I notice that John didn't feel the need to correct any details so I think we can assume this is a fair representation of his beliefs. Am I right then in thinking that we wouldn't expect to find Neanderthal remains alongside those of modern man if indeed Neanderthals had gradually morphed into that form?McCulloch wrote:JCrawford's science seems to be drawing this picture. Round about 6 to 10 thousand years ago, God created a mammalian primate (later called Homo sapien neanderthalis) with a life span many times longer than any currently known mammal. Due to the increasing sin of this species, God decided to destroy the world and start again. Rather than starting from nothing and using magic, like the first time, this time he thought he would cause a universal flood, destroying all land creatures except for a few saved by a neanderthal named Noah. Subsequent to that flood, in only a few thousand years, this species then (de) evolved into one (now called Homo sapien sapien) with a life-span of only a few decades and into the different races which now populate the globe. The strongest evidence for this story is, of course, God's divine revelation to mankind, the Bible.
- Cathar1950
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 10503
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 12:12 pm
- Location: Michigan(616)
- Been thanked: 2 times
Post #100
Neanderthals Did not live to be 200 or 900 they were lucky to live to be 50. Maybe not lucky. They were usually old and crippled.
You have nothing to support your Idea John except some words in a book that are questionable and mythic . They are no fossils of a human living to be even 300 years. You should be a stand up comedian.
You have nothing to support your Idea John except some words in a book that are questionable and mythic . They are no fossils of a human living to be even 300 years. You should be a stand up comedian.