Did the universal constants exist before the big bang?

Creationism, Evolution, and other science issues

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Wootah
Savant
Posts: 9161
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:16 am
Has thanked: 186 times
Been thanked: 105 times

Did the universal constants exist before the big bang?

Post #1

Post by Wootah »

Assuming the universe was created via the big bang, did the universal constants exist before the big bang or were they created at the same time as the big bang?
Proverbs 18:17 The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him.

Member Notes: viewtopic.php?t=33826

"Why is everyone so quick to reason God might be petty. Now that is creating God in our own image :)."

User avatar
William
Savant
Posts: 14003
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
Location: Te Waipounamu
Has thanked: 906 times
Been thanked: 1629 times
Contact:

Re: Did the universal constants exist before the big bang?

Post #11

Post by William »

[Replying to Diagoras in post #9]
1. If they have no dimensions, they are simply numbers (by definition)
I think that this can be said of any abstract mind-related 'things' - such a letters and words.
2. Numbers are abstract objects, in that they can only 'represent' physical objects or phenomena, but are not physical objects themselves (favouring Platonism over Nominalism).
Again, this would apply to letters and words as well. Are sound and light also non-physical objects?
Apparently not, because both depend on physical things in order to be acknowledged as real.
3. Numbers are essential to science (to create the laws that explain observations in the physical world) - by observation.
In order for explanations to be created, letters and words are also essential to science.
3a. Science can make inferences about the past universe (before humans existed) based on those laws.
Also to note, partial evidence [fossil] of things once existing before humans existed can be inferred re what they would most likely have looked like as whole creatures.
4. Abstract objects cannot be proven to exist independently of a human mind (from 2. above)
What can be proven to exist independently of the human mind?
CONCLUSION: the dimensionless universal constants cannot be proven to have existed before the universe began.
Perhaps. Shouldn't it first be established that the human mind exists? What does that actually mean, when we know that these things the human mind creates and utilizes [abstracts] which appear to be fundamental to our understanding the Universe, do not actually exist themselves as physical objects.

Since these are essential to our understanding, yet are not physical objects themselves, it can be said that dimensionless universal constants probably DID exist prior to the universe as non-physical yet fundamentally necessary device, which without - the universe as we currently understand it - would not have come to exist.

In a similar [but infinitely more expansive] manner in which a light bulb could not have existed prior to non physical ideas pertaining to what would be necessary in order to make the lightbulb real.

User avatar
bluegreenearth
Guru
Posts: 1917
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2019 4:06 pm
Location: Manassas, VA
Has thanked: 681 times
Been thanked: 470 times

Re: Did the universal constants exist before the big bang?

Post #12

Post by bluegreenearth »

William wrote: Sat Oct 09, 2021 2:35 pm Perhaps. Shouldn't it first be established that the human mind exists? What does that actually mean, when we know that these things the human mind creates and utilizes [abstracts] which appear to be fundamental to our understanding the Universe, do not actually exist themselves as physical objects.

Since these are essential to our understanding, yet are not physical objects themselves, it can be said that dimensionless universal constants probably DID exist prior to the universe as non-physical yet fundamentally necessary device, which without - the universe as we currently understand it - would not have come to exist.

In a similar [but infinitely more expansive] manner in which a light bulb could not have existed prior to non physical ideas pertaining to what would be necessary in order to make the lightbulb real.
Is it logically possible for abstract thinking to be an emergent property of physical brains in which this evolved capability was naturally selected as a consequence of it providing a survival advantage? If so, then couldn't the "non physical ideas pertaining to what would be necessary in order to make the lightbulb real" have failed to emerge prior to the existence of a physical brain?

User avatar
William
Savant
Posts: 14003
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
Location: Te Waipounamu
Has thanked: 906 times
Been thanked: 1629 times
Contact:

Re: Did the universal constants exist before the big bang?

Post #13

Post by William »

bluegreenearth wrote: Sat Nov 06, 2021 4:02 pm
William wrote: Sat Oct 09, 2021 2:35 pm Perhaps. Shouldn't it first be established that the human mind exists? What does that actually mean, when we know that these things the human mind creates and utilizes [abstracts] which appear to be fundamental to our understanding the Universe, do not actually exist themselves as physical objects.

Since these are essential to our understanding, yet are not physical objects themselves, it can be said that dimensionless universal constants probably DID exist prior to the universe as non-physical yet fundamentally necessary device, which without - the universe as we currently understand it - would not have come to exist.

In a similar [but infinitely more expansive] manner in which a light bulb could not have existed prior to non physical ideas pertaining to what would be necessary in order to make the lightbulb real.
Is it logically possible for abstract thinking to be an emergent property of physical brains in which this evolved capability was naturally selected as a consequence of it providing a survival advantage? If so, then couldn't the "non physical ideas pertaining to what would be necessary in order to make the lightbulb real" have failed to emerge prior to the existence of a physical brain?
Brains are part of the process of humans being humans. It is logically possible that brains couldn't have existed without some type of non-physical idea pertaining to what would be necessary in order to make brains real.
Thus, while the pattern shows clearly enough that the mind appears to be emergent of brain activity, Human brains are responding to something real which it is projecting onto said mind as part of the process of interpreting incoming data into knowledge.

The senses assist the brain with this process.

But can we be certain that the mind is emergent of the brain or if it is the other way around?

User avatar
bluegreenearth
Guru
Posts: 1917
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2019 4:06 pm
Location: Manassas, VA
Has thanked: 681 times
Been thanked: 470 times

Re: Did the universal constants exist before the big bang?

Post #14

Post by bluegreenearth »

William wrote: Sat Nov 06, 2021 5:32 pm But can we be certain that the mind is emergent of the brain or if it is the other way around?
If the brain was emergent of the mind, it would not be reasonable to expect brain injuries to have detectable effects on the mind. Since we observe brain injuries as having detectable effects on the mind, it is reasonable to infer that the brain precedes the mind and not the other way around. Can we be certain of this? No, but we cannot be certain about any such inferences.

User avatar
William
Savant
Posts: 14003
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
Location: Te Waipounamu
Has thanked: 906 times
Been thanked: 1629 times
Contact:

Re: Did the universal constants exist before the big bang?

Post #15

Post by William »

[Replying to bluegreenearth in post #14]
If the brain was emergent of the mind, it would not be reasonable to expect brain injuries to have detectable effects on the mind. If the brain was emergent of the mind, it would not be reasonable to expect brain injuries to have detectable effects on the mind. Since we observe brain injuries as having detectable effects on the mind, it is reasonable to infer that the brain precedes the mind and not the other way around. Can we be certain of this? No, but we cannot be certain about any such inferences.
Yes. We cannot be certain that an injured brain has any detectable effects on the mind, since the mind is immaterial. We know it exists but we cannot be certain what 'it' actually is, or even if it is something that is peculiar to the individuals brain [therefore an emergent property of individual brains] or individual brains just have a natural access to it due to all things material [therefore brains] being emergent properties of The Mind.

An injured brain just tells us that an instrument is broken and cannot function as intended.

It doesn't tell us anything about the mind - only that the brain is injured.

User avatar
bluegreenearth
Guru
Posts: 1917
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2019 4:06 pm
Location: Manassas, VA
Has thanked: 681 times
Been thanked: 470 times

Re: Did the universal constants exist before the big bang?

Post #16

Post by bluegreenearth »

William wrote: Sat Nov 06, 2021 10:09 pm Yes. We cannot be certain that an injured brain has any detectable effects on the mind, since the mind is immaterial. We know it exists but we cannot be certain what 'it' actually is, or even if it is something that is peculiar to the individuals brain [therefore an emergent property of individual brains] or individual brains just have a natural access to it due to all things material [therefore brains] being emergent properties of The Mind.

An injured brain just tells us that an instrument is broken and cannot function as intended.

It doesn't tell us anything about the mind - only that the brain is injured.
How would you determine if a mind was injured?

User avatar
William
Savant
Posts: 14003
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
Location: Te Waipounamu
Has thanked: 906 times
Been thanked: 1629 times
Contact:

Re: Did the universal constants exist before the big bang?

Post #17

Post by William »

bluegreenearth wrote: Sun Nov 07, 2021 9:08 am
William wrote: Sat Nov 06, 2021 10:09 pm Yes. We cannot be certain that an injured brain has any detectable effects on the mind, since the mind is immaterial. We know it exists but we cannot be certain what 'it' actually is, or even if it is something that is peculiar to the individuals brain [therefore an emergent property of individual brains] or individual brains just have a natural access to it due to all things material [therefore brains] being emergent properties of The Mind.

An injured brain just tells us that an instrument is broken and cannot function as intended.

It doesn't tell us anything about the mind - only that the brain is injured.
How would you determine if a mind was injured?
As far as we know;
Nothing is known about the mind that anyone could determine that it even can be injured.

User avatar
We_Are_VENOM
Banned
Banned
Posts: 1632
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2020 2:33 am
Has thanked: 76 times
Been thanked: 58 times

Re: Did the universal constants exist before the big bang?

Post #18

Post by We_Are_VENOM »

Wootah wrote: Wed May 19, 2021 3:53 am Assuming the universe was created via the big bang, did the universal constants exist before the big bang or were they created at the same time as the big bang?
What is up with these questions?

If there was no space before the universe, then how could something within the universe exist before the universe itself existed?

?????????
Venni Vetti Vecci!!

User avatar
bluegreenearth
Guru
Posts: 1917
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2019 4:06 pm
Location: Manassas, VA
Has thanked: 681 times
Been thanked: 470 times

Re: Did the universal constants exist before the big bang?

Post #19

Post by bluegreenearth »

William wrote: Sun Nov 07, 2021 11:07 am As far as we know;
Nothing is known about the mind that anyone could determine that it even can be injured.
Given the above implication, what is the justification for presuming the mind even exists? In other words, is nothing known about the mind that anyone could determine if it even exists in realty as anything other than the emergent property of a brain?

User avatar
William
Savant
Posts: 14003
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 8:11 pm
Location: Te Waipounamu
Has thanked: 906 times
Been thanked: 1629 times
Contact:

Re: Did the universal constants exist before the big bang?

Post #20

Post by William »

bluegreenearth wrote: Sun Nov 07, 2021 11:31 am
William wrote: Sun Nov 07, 2021 11:07 am As far as we know;
Nothing is known about the mind that anyone could determine that it even can be injured.
Given the above implication, what is the justification for presuming the mind even exists? In other words, is nothing known about the mind that anyone could determine if it even exists in realty as anything other than the emergent property of a brain?
We know the mind exists. We dont know if it is an emergent property of the brain.

Post Reply