I was wondering if anyone who considers homosexuality a sin, could tell me what is wrong with it.
I'm talking in the sense of utilitarian morals. How does homosexual intercourse, or homosexual marriage, increase the suffering in the world?
Homosexuality
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Homosexuality
Post #201Yes, it appears he will simply rest on and argument that it's "TRADITION!". I'm sure there will be a long series of apologetic argument that appease any questions he might have, but I'm not seeing how that "argument tree" would look.
I'd like to see how one argues for the Divine Origin of various texts about God, then the process of collecting it, editing, abridging, etc...
If we are to accept this, then God is simply a creation of Man - written into a book and declared authentic by some guys a few thousand years ago.
I think we are owed more than that.
Thinking about God's opinions and thinking about your own opinions uses an identical thought process. - Tomas Rees
Re: Homosexuality
Post #202You are assuming that, because I know it through these sources, I do not know it myself, and that I don't agree with it because of my own logic and reasoning, but because I read it.Goat wrote: So, you are basically accepting other people's words and interpretations about what God wants, rather than knowing yourself.
That's cool, if that's what you want to believe. But it's not the truth. I do believe in Catholic teachings, not because I was told, but because, as a rational and thinking person, they make the most sense to me, vs all the alternatives.
But again, if you want to dismiss it all just because, that's fine by me.
- Goat
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 24999
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 6:09 pm
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: Homosexuality
Post #203Why, then it is 'tradition, and because I said so'.pmprcv wrote:You are assuming that, because I know it through these sources, I do not know it myself, and that I don't agree with it because of my own logic and reasoning, but because I read it.Goat wrote: So, you are basically accepting other people's words and interpretations about what God wants, rather than knowing yourself.
That's cool, if that's what you want to believe. But it's not the truth. I do believe in Catholic teachings, not because I was told, but because, as a rational and thinking person, they make the most sense to me, vs all the alternatives.
But again, if you want to dismiss it all just because, that's fine by me.
It seem rather egotistical to say "God wants this", when you have no way of actually showing that is what God wants.
“What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?�
Steven Novella
Steven Novella
Re: Homosexuality
Post #204I'll dismiss it. I don't think you know what you are talking about when you say, paraphrasing, "God wants what my religion says".pmprcv wrote:You are assuming that, because I know it through these sources, I do not know it myself, and that I don't agree with it because of my own logic and reasoning, but because I read it.Goat wrote: So, you are basically accepting other people's words and interpretations about what God wants, rather than knowing yourself.
That's cool, if that's what you want to believe. But it's not the truth. I do believe in Catholic teachings, not because I was told, but because, as a rational and thinking person, they make the most sense to me, vs all the alternatives.
But again, if you want to dismiss it all just because, that's fine by me.
I'd feel more comfortable if God told me, or someone had better reasons.
Thinking about God's opinions and thinking about your own opinions uses an identical thought process. - Tomas Rees
Post #205
If you guys want to talk about how to decide whether a certain source is trustworthy or not, why not discuss a more relevant book:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexua ... _and_Women
or perhaps some relevant statistics:
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/basics/ataglance.html
Not that the bible isn't relevant, but for those who don't consider it so, there are other options.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexua ... _and_Women
or perhaps some relevant statistics:
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/basics/ataglance.html
Not that the bible isn't relevant, but for those who don't consider it so, there are other options.
Re: Homosexuality
Post #206Any time I dare to give my opinion of homosexuality, I face retribution from the LGBT community. Somehow, it has become anathema to have an opinion on the subject.razovor wrote: I was wondering if anyone who considers homosexuality a sin, could tell me what is wrong with it.
I'm talking in the sense of utilitarian morals. How does homosexual intercourse, or homosexual marriage, increase the suffering in the world?
THAT is immoral, and it's an indication of the character of the community.
I'd like to see more gays talking about the apparent anti-Christian trend among their members.
Re: Homosexuality
Post #207Aw, it must be so horrible...The Me's wrote:Any time I dare to give my opinion of homosexuality, I face retribution from the LGBT community. Somehow, it has become anathema to have an opinion on the subject.razovor wrote: I was wondering if anyone who considers homosexuality a sin, could tell me what is wrong with it.
I'm talking in the sense of utilitarian morals. How does homosexual intercourse, or homosexual marriage, increase the suffering in the world?
Blame the victim? So, your religion tells them they are bad, and you are the one who is persecuted... wow.THAT is immoral, and it's an indication of the character of the community.
I'd like to see more gays talking about the apparent anti-Christian trend among their members.
Just. Wow.
Thinking about God's opinions and thinking about your own opinions uses an identical thought process. - Tomas Rees