The reason behind good deeds
Moderator: Moderators
The reason behind good deeds
Post #1For what reason do we do good deeds? What are the motives behind them?
<i>'Beauty is truth, truth beauty,—that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.'</i>
-John Keats, Ode on a Grecian Urn.
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.'</i>
-John Keats, Ode on a Grecian Urn.
Post #2
I have often pondered this very question. I still have yet to find a satisfactory answer. To my naked eye, all good deeds seem to be the result of an inate selfishness.For what reason do we do good deeds? What are the motives behind them?
If man is supposedly in a fallen state why cant this be true? Can we truly reach an 'agape' state in our relations with one another?
At one point in my life i believed this was possible...I'm not so sure anymore. I believed that by helping others I was truly being selfless, but in the end isnt it either for your own unconcious gratification or borne of fear in a supreme being? Is there something else that drives this? (Other than the obvious things like guilt, and remorse.) I guess I have no foundation here, only questions.
What is the first business of one who practices philosophy? To get rid of self-conceit. For it is impossible for anyone to begin to learn that which he thinks he already knows.
- Epictetus (Discourses)
- Epictetus (Discourses)
Post #3
Wow, you surmised the point of my post instantly. Am I that transparent?
Nothing kills debate like agreement.
Nothing kills debate like agreement.
<i>'Beauty is truth, truth beauty,—that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.'</i>
-John Keats, Ode on a Grecian Urn.
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.'</i>
-John Keats, Ode on a Grecian Urn.
- otseng
- Savant
- Posts: 20522
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 1:16 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Has thanked: 197 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
- Contact:
Post #4
But, is having pleasure/gratification for self necessarily bad?Travis wrote:To my naked eye, all good deeds seem to be the result of an inate selfishness.
I've created a new thread to ponder this:
Legitimate pleasure - When is pleasure good? When is it bad?
- seekinghokmah
- Student
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2004 2:24 pm
- Location: Canada
Post #5
Is it correct to assume that your motives can never be pure?To my naked eye, all good deeds seem to be the result of an inate selfishness.
Jesus said "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, all your mind and all your strength, and love your neighbor as yourself" since all laws flow from this one. In other words, for a truly regenerate soul good deeds will come as a natural result of loving God...not out of obedience to a rule, or fear of punishment..or for selfish gain. It is impossible to attain by our own power, but "with God all things are possible".
However...even if the motives are "selfish", if by doing good deeds in this world we are shaping who we will be in the world to come are we the only ones who benefit? Can't we accomplish both simultaneously, and since good deeds draw us nearer to God aren't we then fulfilling Jesus command to love Him...and simply reaping as a natural result of fulfilling it?
Good questions, when answered, always lead to better ones.
- Angry McFurious
- Student
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 10:24 pm
Re: The reason behind good deeds
Post #6I think it really depends on the situtation. Comforting an attractive person for personal gain or helping an older person out of kindness. Just depends.Corvus wrote:For what reason do we do good deeds? What are the motives behind them?
~Jews Rock~
Re: The reason behind good deeds
Post #7It depend on the situation. There have been times when I was helping someone for my own benefit but did not realise it, but there have been times when I have made sacrafices for someone knowing they could never repay meCorvus wrote:For what reason do we do good deeds? What are the motives behind them?
Post #9
i actually think that i behave morally because i care about other people.
But that doesn't explain why you behave morally to those particular people. I say "those particular people" because I have great doubts you would give the shirt off your back to a homeless man begging for change. Likely you care about some people because a) you like them b)you were born into a community in which their opinion of you could actually matter. Likely you do good by them because it makes you feel good. Instances of self-sacrifice for others, in which the pain far outweighs the pleasure received, are rare indeed.
I commend you for coming to this conclusion, which most people shy from. We can glorify the world (or god) through poor intentions that yield good results. Once, with the best of intentions, I caused quite destructive results. I am glad I am no longer in a situation where I have to decide. I am being cryptic for a purpose, of course.However...even if the motives are "selfish", if by doing good deeds in this world we are shaping who we will be in the world to come are we the only ones who benefit? Can't we accomplish both simultaneously, and since good deeds draw us nearer to God aren't we then fulfilling Jesus command to love Him...and simply reaping as a natural result of fulfilling it?
I know that I think therefore I am/exist. Because of this, all ethical arguments must proceed from this notable axiom, so I try to construct ethical systems that rely upon in order to have a system both sound and valid (not to mention palatable) that does not rely on the belief of God. This is not to say I always behave rationally. I merely construct systems for a rational method of behaviour.
To quote Andre Gide (for the nth time)
True, I have often been glad to justify my acts to myself by a doctrine, even by a complete system of ordered thought; but at other times, I could not help suspecting that I was merely providing a shelter for my sensuality.
<i>'Beauty is truth, truth beauty,—that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.'</i>
-John Keats, Ode on a Grecian Urn.
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.'</i>
-John Keats, Ode on a Grecian Urn.
Post #10
i've given money to charity without telling anyone. the charity was for children in africa. i really missed that money. whatever good feeling i felt is certainly not worth $500 (in fact, whenever i think about it i tend to think about what else i could have done with the money.) is it really so hard to believe that people can care about (and make sacrifices for) people they have never met?Corvus wrote:i actually think that i behave morally because i care about other people.
But that doesn't explain why you behave morally to those particular people. I say "those particular people" because I have great doubts you would give the shirt off your back to a homeless man begging for change. Likely you care about some people because a) you like them b)you were born into a community in which their opinion of you could actually matter. Likely you do good by them because it makes you feel good. Instances of self-sacrifice for others, in which the pain far outweighs the pleasure received, are rare indeed.