If we assume the non-existence of God, why should there be any morals at all ?.
Since morals in any belief system defines what's right and wrong, and people of any belief system follow the morals according to their books, what if God doesn't exist?. Why should we be moral after his non-existence?
I'm not here to discuss what is right and wrong according to anyone, so please avoid making hypotheses about what morals could mean.
We will agree in this debate that morals are habits acquired through a belief system. After we finish discussing the Question of this debate, we will discuss morals in more detail.
If God doesn't exist!
Moderator: Moderators
- Tcg
- Savant
- Posts: 8495
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:01 am
- Location: Third Stone
- Has thanked: 2147 times
- Been thanked: 2295 times
Re: If God doesn't exist!
Post #41Of course it's a conclusion and your view point relies on it being true. You've skipped the step of showing that it is a valid approach.
Yes. That is the topic of this thread. Morality absent god/gods. I've provided the very thing you claimed to want to discuss.
you failed to do any constructive argument but started showing how non-religious people could have some sort of morality
Great, we've reached a conclusion we both agree on.
and that's some thing I didn't deny not being religious doesn't require not being moral.
Yes. I also think that theists should be moral too.But do you think every non-religious person should be moral ?
Tcg
To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it is a lack of belief in gods.
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
- American Atheists
Not believing isn't the same as believing not.
- wiploc
I must assume that knowing is better than not knowing, venturing than not venturing; and that magic and illusion, however rich, however alluring, ultimately weaken the human spirit.
- Irvin D. Yalom
-
- Scholar
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 6:45 am
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: If God doesn't exist!
Post #42[Replying to Tcg in post #42]
I didn't skip it I provided logical reasoning and depended on atheists opinions of the topic to support my opinionOf course it's a conclusion and your view point relies on it being true. You've skipped the step of showing that it is a valid approach.
Again I need a valid proof supported by evidence for this and up till now I had non.Yes. That is the topic of this thread. Morality absent god/gods. I've provided the very thing you claimed to want to discuss.
You just answered "Yes" and the reason and also the evidence is missing. For a religious person being moral is obligatory by god, now for non-religious person why morals is obligatory?.Yes. I also think that theists should be moral too.
- Purple Knight
- Prodigy
- Posts: 3512
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2020 6:00 pm
- Has thanked: 1134 times
- Been thanked: 733 times
Re: If God doesn't exist!
Post #43Because the next-most-moral being just makes the rules then.
Look, you've all already accepted that if there is a God, it makes the rules. Its decree makes right and wrong. I don't know why you've all done this but I assume it's because God is the Most Moral Being.
Soooo.... if that particular being (God of the Bible) doesn't exist, the next-most-moral being is the Most Moral Being and it makes the rules, even if it happens to be a human.
-
- Scholar
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2016 6:45 am
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 12 times
Re: If God doesn't exist!
Post #44[Replying to Purple Knight in post #44]
Pretty much logical and I agree.
But first take into consideration that those rules are like chains and giving the mice utopia experiment as an example you will notice that all the mice died not because of the small space but because of no rules.
And if we skip the first part there are some complications with this human being.
1- Humans are not ultimately wise so their rules are subject to mistakes no matter how wise they become.
2- Humans lack complete knowledge and there knowledge will not be enough to set the best rules.
And you can add all the deficiencies the human beings have to the list.
In other words, human beings will follow their desires other than justice, and we can see that clearly in the laws made by men, they have lots of loopholes.
Between I'm a Muslim not Christian.
Pretty much logical and I agree.
But first take into consideration that those rules are like chains and giving the mice utopia experiment as an example you will notice that all the mice died not because of the small space but because of no rules.
And if we skip the first part there are some complications with this human being.
1- Humans are not ultimately wise so their rules are subject to mistakes no matter how wise they become.
2- Humans lack complete knowledge and there knowledge will not be enough to set the best rules.
And you can add all the deficiencies the human beings have to the list.
In other words, human beings will follow their desires other than justice, and we can see that clearly in the laws made by men, they have lots of loopholes.
Between I'm a Muslim not Christian.